IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9983-d1521963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Explorative Study on Packaging-Saving Consumer Practices in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Tabea Habermehl

    (TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Professorship of Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, 94315 Straubing, Germany)

  • Thomas Decker

    (TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Professorship of Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, 94315 Straubing, Germany)

  • Klaus Menrad

    (TUM Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Professorship of Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, 94315 Straubing, Germany)

Abstract

Considering global plastic waste pollution, current production and consumption patterns must be changed. Various measures address this challenge, which can be divided into efficiency, consistency, and sufficiency. Sufficiency has become more critical as research on sustainable consumption and packaging-related behavior has shown that efficiency and consistency strategies alone cannot solve environmental challenges. A deeper understanding of consumers’ packaging-related behavior is necessary to promote sufficiency-oriented consumption patterns and support consumers in everyday implementation. This study aims to investigate consumers’ packaging-saving practices in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector and to explore to what extent the practices differ in their actual feasibility in everyday life. For this purpose, we conducted an online survey in Germany with open-ended questions ( n = 299). We evaluated the open-ended questions using qualitative content analysis. Overall, the results show that reducing plastic packaging plays a significant role in the participants’ everyday lives. However, the extent to which plastic packaging is avoided or reduced varies by consumption sector. This study extends research on plastic packaging avoidance and reduction to non-food consumption sectors. It also provides essential impulses for actors from science, politics, and industry regarding how consumers can be more strongly supported in their packaging-related behavior in the future, through targeted measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tabea Habermehl & Thomas Decker & Klaus Menrad, 2024. "An Explorative Study on Packaging-Saving Consumer Practices in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9983-:d:1521963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katharina Klug, 2018. "Vom Nischentrend zum Lebensstil," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-21110-3, April.
    2. Spangenberg, Joachim H. & Lorek, Sylvia, 2019. "Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1070-1079.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim & Tu, Gengyang & Whitmarsh, Lorraine & Whittle, Colin, 2022. "Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Zell-Ziegler, Carina & Thema, Johannes & Best, Benjamin & Wiese, Frauke & Lage, Jonas & Schmidt, Annika & Toulouse, Edouard & Stagl, Sigrid, 2021. "Enough? The role of sufficiency in European energy and climate plans," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. O'Dell, Dallas & Contu, Davide & Shreedhar, Ganga, 2025. "Public support for degrowth policies and sufficiency behaviours in the United States: a discrete choice experiment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126084, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Atsushi Watabe & Simon Gilby, 2020. "To See a World in a Grain of Sand—The Transformative Potential of Small Community Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Goggins, Gary & Rau, Henrike & Moran, Paul & Fahy, Frances & Goggins, Jamie, 2022. "The role of culture in advancing sustainable energy policy and practice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Pedro Manuel Sousa & Maria João Moreira & Ana Pinto de Moura & Rui Costa Lima & Luís Miguel Cunha, 2021. "Consumer Perception of the Circular Economy Concept Applied to the Food Domain: An Exploratory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson, 2023. "Circular economy, operational eco-efficiency, and sufficiency. An integrated view," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    9. Maria Csutora & Gabor Harangozo & Cecilia Szigeti, 2022. "Factors behind the Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Business Models in Pandemic Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Bedggood, Rowan & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & McAndrew, Ryan & Glavas, Charmaine & Dulleck, Uwe, 2023. "Challenging the social-power paradigm: Moving beyond consumer empowerment to an energy ecosystem of shared value," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Jouzi, Fatemeh & Levänen, Jarkko & Mikkilä, Mirja & Linnanen, Lassi, 2024. "To spend or to avoid? A critical review on the role of money in aiming for sufficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Cellina, Francesca & Fraternali, Piero & Herrera Gonzalez, Sergio Luis & Novak, Jasminko & Gui, Marco & Rizzoli, Andrea Emilio, 2024. "Significant but transient: The impact of an energy saving app targeting Swiss households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    13. Florence Ziesemer & Alexandra Hüttel & Ingo Balderjahn, 2019. "Pioneers’ Insights into Governing Social Innovation for Sustainable Anti-Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Siet J. Sijtsema & Harriëtte M. Snoek & Mariët A. van Haaster-de Winter & Hans Dagevos, 2019. "Let’s Talk about Circular Economy: A Qualitative Exploration of Consumer Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Andreas Exner & Anke Strüver, 2020. "Addressing the Sustainability Paradox: The Analysis of “Good Food” in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Leandro Pereira & Rita Carvalho & Álvaro Dias & Renato Costa & Nelson António, 2021. "How Does Sustainability Affect Consumer Choices in the Fashion Industry?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-30, April.
    17. Lea Marie Heidbreder & Josephine Tröger & Manfred Schmitt, 2023. "Exploring the psychological antecedents of private and public sphere behaviours to reduce household plastic consumption," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3405-3428, April.
    18. Alessandro De Palma & Marco Faillo & Roberto Gabriele, 2023. "Decentralized Energy: How 100% Renewable Energy Regions Affect Households’ Saving Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2055, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Rémi Beulque & Helen Micheaux & Joël Ntsondé & Franck Aggeri & Chloé Steux, 2023. "Sufficiency-based circular business models: An established retailers’ perspective," Post-Print hal-04391545, HAL.
    20. Baumgartner, Anne & Krysiak, Frank C. & Kuhlmey, Florian, 2022. "Sufficiency without regret," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9983-:d:1521963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.