IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9877-d1519469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competition Between Taxi Services and On-Demand Ride-Sharing Services: A Service Quality Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan Science and Technology University, 66 Wailiu Road, Wanbailin District, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Zeyu Wang

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77840, USA)

  • Chunming Xu

    (Institute of Operations Research and Systems Engineering, College of Science, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Di Wang

    (School·of Accountancy, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China)

Abstract

On-demand ride-sharing services change our travel behavior, which threatens the survival of taxi services. Motivated by this, this paper examines the impact of on-demand ride-sharing services on taxi services and how to achieve the coexistence of two services from a service quality perspective. This paper analyzes the coexistence condition of two services considering the network effect. First, the profit target for taxi drivers is nonnegative. A Stackelberg model is built in which the taxi service is the leader and the on-demand ride-sharing service is the follower. Then, the reference dependency theory is introduced to modify the profit target of taxi drivers. And the new coexistence condition is compared with the benchmark status. The results find that the coexistence of the two services depends on the type of riders and the quality difference in both cases. When two services and riders are highly heterogenous, two services are more likely to coexist. Services with different qualities could better satisfy the diverse preferences of riders. Considering taxi profit without competition as the profit reference point, the requirement of service quality difference and the diversity of rider composition is increased. In terms of the network effect, the negative network effect is more beneficial to the coexistence of two services.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yang & Zeyu Wang & Chunming Xu & Di Wang, 2024. "The Competition Between Taxi Services and On-Demand Ride-Sharing Services: A Service Quality Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9877-:d:1519469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9877/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9877/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    2. Young, Mischa & Farber, Steven, 2019. "The who, why, and when of Uber and other ride-hailing trips: An examination of a large sample household travel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 383-392.
    3. Franziska Völckner & Julian Hofmann, 2007. "The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 181-196, September.
    4. Harish Guda & Upender Subramanian, 2019. "Your Uber Is Arriving: Managing On-Demand Workers Through Surge Pricing, Forecast Communication, and Worker Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1995-2014, May.
    5. Cetin, Tamer & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2019. "Regulation of taxis and the rise of ridesharing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 149-158.
    6. Chen, Xiqun (Michael) & Zheng, Hongyu & Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Dynamic optimization strategies for on-demand ride services platform: Surge pricing, commission rate, and incentives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 23-45.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Wang, Shiying & Chen, Huimiao & Wu, Desheng, 2019. "Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 131-143.
    9. Zhongmiao Sun & Qi Xu & Baoli Shi, 2020. "Dynamic Pricing of Ride-Hailing Platforms considering Service Quality and Supply Capacity under Demand Fluctuation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-26, July.
    10. Vignon, Daniel & Yin, Yafeng & Ke, Jintao, 2023. "Regulating the ride-hailing market in the age of uberization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Li, Sen & Tavafoghi, Hamidreza & Poolla, Kameshwar & Varaiya, Pravin, 2019. "Regulating TNCs: Should Uber and Lyft set their own rules?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 193-225.
    12. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    13. Terry A. Taylor, 2018. "On-Demand Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 704-720, October.
    14. Ma, Jie & Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Ridesharing user equilibrium problem under OD-based surge pricing strategy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-24.
    15. Young, Mischa & Farber, Steven, 2019. "The Who, Why, and When of Uber and other Ride-hailing Trips: An Examination of a Large Sample Household Travel Survey," OSF Preprints x7ryj, Center for Open Science.
    16. Saif Benjaafar & Guangwen Kong & Xiang Li & Costas Courcoubetis, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Product Sharing: Implications for Ownership, Usage, and Social Welfare in the Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 477-493, February.
    17. Guo, Yuhan & Zhang, Yu & Boulaksil, Youssef & Qian, Yaguan & Allaoui, Hamid, 2023. "Modelling and analysis of online ride-sharing platforms – A sustainability perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 577-595.
    18. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Xiqun Michael Chen, 2020. "A Balancing Act of Regulating On-Demand Ride Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2975-2992, July.
    19. Julian Hofmann & Michel Clement & Franziska Völckner & Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, 2007. "The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants," Post-Print hal-02990424, HAL.
    20. Wang, Zhiqi & Zhang, Yufeng & Jia, Bin & Gao, Ziyou, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Usage Patterns and Underlying Determinants for Ride-hailing and Traditional Taxi Services: A Chicago Case Study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jie & Zhao, Daozhi & Wang, Zeyu & Xu, Chunqiu, 2022. "Impact of regulation on on-demand ride-sharing service: Profit-based target vs demand-based target," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Wang, Jing-Peng & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2022. "Operations on an on-demand ride service system with express and limousine," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 348-373.
    3. Hu, Xinru & Zhou, Shuiyin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Li, Jianbin & Zhang, Chi, 2024. "Optimal pricing strategy of an on-demand platform with cross-regional passengers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. He, Shan & Dai, Ying & Ma, Zu-Jun, 2023. "To offer or not to offer? The optimal value-insured strategy for crowdsourced delivery platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Liu, Yang & Li, Sen, 2023. "An economic analysis of on-demand food delivery platforms: Impacts of regulations and integration with ride-sourcing platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Zhong, Yuanguang & Lan, Yibo & Chen, Zhi & Yang, Jiazi, 2023. "On-demand ride-hailing platforms with heterogeneous quality-sensitive customers: Dedicated system or pooling system?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 247-266.
    7. Di Ao & Jing Gao & Zhijie Lai & Sen Li, 2021. "Regulating Transportation Network Companies with a Mixture of Autonomous Vehicles and For-Hire Human Drivers," Papers 2112.07218, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    8. Ke, Jintao & Chen, Xiqun (Michael) & Yang, Hai & Li, Sen, 2022. "Coordinating supply and demand in ride-sourcing markets with pre-assigned pooling service and traffic congestion externality," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Tang, Wei & Xie, Ningke & Mo, Dong & Cai, Zeen & Lee, Der-Horng & Chen, Xiqun (Michael), 2023. "Optimizing subsidy strategies of the ride-sourcing platform under government regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Lin Tian & Baojun Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Entry in the Product-Sharing Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 553-568, May.
    11. Chen, Mingyang & Zhao, Daozhi & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Zhaofu, 2021. "Reference-dependent preferences in the on-demand service newsvendor with self-scheduling capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Xingyuan Li & Jing Bai, 2021. "A Ridesharing Choice Behavioral Equilibrium Model with Users of Heterogeneous Values of Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2020. "The impact of surge pricing on customer retention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 175-180.
    15. Li, Xiaonan & Li, Xiangyong & Shi, Junxin, 2024. "Capacity sharing for ride-sourcing platforms under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Xiong, Ziyue & Jian Li, & Wu, Hangbin, 2021. "Understanding operation patterns of urban online ride-hailing services: A case study of Xiamen," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-118.
    17. Anne Corcos, 2023. "How nudges and marketing, frame time preference “for your own good”: a behavioral model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Chen, Mingyang & Zhao, Daozhi & Gong, Yeming & Rekik, Yacine, 2022. "An on-demand service platform with self-scheduling capacity: Uniform versus multiplier-based pricing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai & Li, Xinwei & Wang, Hai & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 411-431.
    20. Sun, Luoyi & Teunter, Ruud H. & Hua, Guowei & Wu, Tian, 2020. "Taxi-hailing platforms: Inform or Assign drivers?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 197-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9877-:d:1519469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.