IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9714-d1516231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Immersive Technology in Museums on Visitors’ Behavioral Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Liu

    (Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-OK, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Chonlavit Sutunyarak

    (Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-OK, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

Museums are precious carriers of human civilization and history as well as important places for cultural inheritance and education. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, museums are now facing the challenge of enhancing visitors’ experiences. The use of immersive technology in museums can blur the real and virtual worlds to offer visitors a unique experience. Based on the TAM and flow theory, this study analyzes the influence of immersion technology in museums on visitors’ behavioral intention. The results of the study show that, according to the TAM, the perceived usefulness and ease of use of immersive technologies in museums affect visitors’ attitudes and satisfaction. Similarly, perceived enjoyment and concentration, as described in the flow theory, also influence these attitudes and satisfaction levels. Additionally, visitors’ attitudes and satisfaction with immersive technologies impact their behavioral intentions. The findings are instructive for museums to enhance visitor experience and promote sustainable museum development.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Liu & Chonlavit Sutunyarak, 2024. "The Impact of Immersive Technology in Museums on Visitors’ Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9714-:d:1516231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    2. Eko Harry Pratisto & Nik Thompson & Vidyasagar Potdar, 2022. "Immersive technologies for tourism: a systematic review," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 181-219, June.
    3. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    4. Martín-Ruiz, David & Castellanos-Verdugo, Mario & Oviedo-García, Ma de los Ángeles, 2010. "A visitors' evaluation index for a visit to an archaeological site," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 590-596.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    3. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    4. Hoon S. Cha & Jong Hyun Wi & Chanhi Park & Taeha Kim, 2021. "Sustainability Calculus in Adopting Smart Speakers—Personalized Services and Privacy Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt45q5p1vb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Akram, Umair & Junaid, Muhammad & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Li, Zhiwen & Fan, Mingyue, 2021. "Online purchase intention in Chinese social commerce platforms: Being emotional or rational?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Arif Hasan & S. K. Gupta, 2020. "Exploring Tourists’ Behavioural Intentions Towards Use of Select Mobile Wallets for Digital Payments," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 177-194, December.
    8. Savaya, Riki & Monnickendam, Menachem & Waysman, Mark, 2006. "Extent and type of worker utilization of an integrated information system in a human services agency," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 209-216, August.
    9. Barnes, Stuart J. & Vidgen, Richard T., 2014. "Technology socialness and Web site satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-25.
    10. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    11. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    12. Andrei OGREZEANU, 2015. "Models Of Technology Adoption: An Integrative Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 55-67, June.
    13. Kimiagari, Salman & Asadi Malafe, Neda Sharifi, 2021. "The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Christophe Bezes, 2009. "E-Commerce Website Evaluation: A Critical Review," Working Papers hal-00611008, HAL.
    15. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    16. Minh Ha Nguyen & Bui Thanh Khoa, 2019. "Perceived Mental Benefit in Electronic Commerce: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Abbes, Intissar & Hallem, Yousra & Taga, Nadia, 2020. "Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    19. Brad Sago, 2015. "A Comparison Of User Perceptions And Frequency Of Use Of Social Media To Use Of Social Media," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(1), pages 15-29.
    20. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2014. "The moderating effect of experience in the adoption of mobile payment tools in Virtual Social Networks: The m-Payment Acceptance Model in Virtual Social Networks (MPAM-VSN)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 151-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9714-:d:1516231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.