IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9585-d1513481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces: Insights from a 30-Year Remote Sensing Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Miaomiao Hu

    (School of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Tan Yigitcanlar

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Fei Li

    (City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Shengqi Deng

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Yabo Yang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

The rapid pace of urbanization and industrialization has reshaped land use patterns globally, particularly within the interconnected domains of ‘production, living, and ecological spaces’ (PLES). Understanding the spatiotemporal evolution of these spaces is crucial for guiding sustainable development. Although a number of previous studies have explored aspects of their dynamics and driving factors, further investigation is needed to fully understand their long-term spatiotemporal evolution and the broader influences of socio-economic and environmental forces. This study aims to fill that important gap by leveraging advanced remote sensing techniques to analyze PLES transformations over a 30-year period. Using Henan Province, China, as a testbed, this study applies high-resolution Landsat data, land use transition matrices, dynamic degree analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and multiple linear regressions to uncover trends and underlying drivers. The results reveal a substantial reduction in production spaces by 3394.62 km² steady growth in living spaces by 4459.41 km² and complex, non-linear changes in ecological spaces, which decreased by 1067.43 km². Key driving forces, such as economic growth, urbanization, and fiscal policies are identified and discussed. These insights provide a robust framework for sustainable land use planning, with broader implications for rapidly urbanizing regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaomiao Hu & Tan Yigitcanlar & Fei Li & Shengqi Deng & Yabo Yang, 2024. "Sustainable Development of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces: Insights from a 30-Year Remote Sensing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9585-:d:1513481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuang Lu & Zibo Zhou & Mingyang Houding & Liu Yang & Qiang Gao & Chenglong Cao & Xiang Li & Ziqiang Bu, 2023. "Study into the Evolution of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces on the Indochina Peninsula," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Furui Xi & Runping Wang & Jusong Shi & Jinde Zhang & Yang Yu & Na Wang & Zhiyi Wang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Conflict Identification of Production–Living–Ecological Space in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Xiaofu Chen & Chang Liu & Xiaohua Yu, 2022. "Urbanization, Economic Development, and Ecological Environment: Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Ruiqiu Pang & Ning Hu & Jingrui Zhou & Dongqi Sun & Hongying Ye, 2022. "Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Chaoran Gao & Jinxin Wang & Manman Wang & Yan Zhang, 2023. "Simulating Urban Agglomeration Expansion in Henan Province, China: An Analysis of Driving Mechanisms Using the FLUS Model with Considerations for Urban Interactions and Ecological Constraints," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Gang Lin & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang, 2021. "Production–Living–Ecological Conflict Identification Using a Multiscale Integration Model Based on Spatial Suitability Analysis and Sustainable Development Evaluation: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Carrilho, João & Dgedge, Gustavo & Santos, Pedro Manuel Pinto dos & Trindade, Jorge, 2024. "Sustainable land use: Policy implications of systematic land regularization in Mozambique," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Chen, Mengting & Luo, Yufeng & Shen, Yingying & Han, Zhenzhong & Cui, Yuanlai, 2020. "Driving force analysis of irrigation water consumption using principal component regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Tian, Fenghao & Li, Mingyu & Han, Xulong & Liu, Hui & Mo, Boxian, 2020. "A Production–Living–Ecological Space Model for Land-Use Optimisation: A case study of the core Tumen River region in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Yangyang Yuan & Yuchen Yang & Ruijun Wang & Yuning Cheng, 2022. "Predicting Rural Ecological Space Boundaries in the Urban Fringe Area Based on Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Xinxin Fu & Xiaofeng Wang & Jitao Zhou & Jiahao Ma, 2021. "Optimizing the Production-Living-Ecological Space for Reducing the Ecosystem Services Deficit," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yu Chen & Xuyang Su & Xuekai Wang, 2022. "Spatial Transformation Characteristics and Conflict Measurement of Production-Living-Ecology: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Xinghua Cui & Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Guanzheng Wang & Jiale Liang & Sipei Pan & Binqiao Duan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Sipei Pan & Jiale Liang & Jiaojiao Bian, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Jin, Hong & Li, Heping & Lee, Jia & Sun, Weitong, 2023. "Simulation analysis of rural land use using rate of change driven by population and economic dynamics - A case study of Huangguashan village in Chongqing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    8. Zipeng Chen & Yongqiang Liu & Shuangshuang Tu, 2022. "Comprehensive Eco-Environmental Effects Caused by Land Use Transition from the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces in a Typical Region: A Case Study of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Hui Li & Haitao Jing & Geding Yan & Huanchao Guo & Wenfei Luan, 2023. "Long-Term Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation and Its Driving Mechanism in Luoyang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Xiaotong Xie & Kunlin Wu & Yingchao Li & Shanshan Guo & Xiaoshun Li, 2024. "How to Coordinate the Relationship between Urban Space Exploitation, Economic Development, and Ecological Environment: Evidence from Henan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Furui Xi & Gang Lin & Yanan Zhao & Xiang Li & Zhiyu Chen & Chenglong Cao, 2023. "Land Use Optimization and Carbon Storage Estimation in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Zhongshun Gong & Ye Yuan & Lu Qie & Sihua Huang & Xuefeng Xie & Rui Zhong & Lijie Pu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Coupling Coordination Relationship of the Production–Living–Ecological Function at County Scale: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Awais, Minahil & Afzal, Ayesha & Firdousi, Saba & Hasnaoui, Amir, 2023. "Is fintech the new path to sustainable resource utilisation and economic development?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Nattapong Puttanapong & Amornrat Luenam & Pit Jongwattanakul, 2022. "Spatial Analysis of Inequality in Thailand: Applications of Satellite Data and Spatial Statistics/Econometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Gao, Zitian & Guo, Danlu & Ryu, Dongryeol & Western, Andrew W., 2024. "Exploring key factors driving farm-level seasonal irrigation water usage with Bayesian hierarchical modelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    20. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9585-:d:1513481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.