IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9245-d1505865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism Analysis and Path Study of Digital Transformation on Corporate Governance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Songling Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yafei Tai

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Jianing Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Corporate digital transformation, primarily driven by data and leveraging digital technologies and mathematical algorithms such as Internet+, big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and blockchain, is a crucial enabler of sustainable development. This transformation integrates various aspects of corporate production and operations, enhancing the level of digital operations and ultimately contributing to high-quality and sustainable development. This paper, based on data from listed companies in China’s A-shares from 2007 to 2021, theoretically articulates the intrinsic mechanism between corporate digital transformation and corporate governance level, with a focus on sustainability. It empirically finds that a higher degree of digital transformation correlates with an improved level of corporate governance, fostering sustainable practices. Further investigation reveals that digital transformation elevates corporate governance by enhancing innovation capabilities, reducing information asymmetry, and promoting sustainable strategies. This paper provides policy insights for promoting corporate digital transformation as a means to achieve sustainability goals and optimizing management’s corporate governance level for long-term sustainable success.

Suggested Citation

  • Songling Yang & Yafei Tai & Jianing Liu, 2024. "Mechanism Analysis and Path Study of Digital Transformation on Corporate Governance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9245-:d:1505865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jfinan:v:43:y:1988:i:3:p:567-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Yaozhi Xu & Liling Xu, 2023. "The Convergence between Digital Industrialization and Industrial Digitalization and Export Technology Complexity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    4. David W. Anderson & Stewart J. Melanson & Jiri Maly, 2007. "The Evolution of Corporate Governance: power redistribution brings boards to life," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 780-797, September.
    5. Pan, Wenrong & Xie, Tao & Wang, Zhuwang & Ma, Lisha, 2022. "Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 303-311.
    6. Zhao, Tianyu & Yan, Na & Ji, Liya, 2023. "Digital transformation, life cycle and internal control effectiveness: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    7. Michael N. Young & Mike W. Peng & David Ahlstrom & Garry D. Bruton & Yi Jiang, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 196-220, January.
    8. Fuxiu Jiang & Kenneth A Kim, 2020. "Corporate Governance in China: A Survey [The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 24(4), pages 733-772.
    9. Liao, Feimei & Hu, Yaoyao & Chen, Mengjie & Xu, Shulin, 2024. "Digital transformation and corporate green supply chain efficiency: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 195-207.
    10. Eric Overby, 2008. "Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 277-291, April.
    11. Chen, Zhongfei & Jiang, Kangqi, 2024. "Digitalization and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. ElMassah, Suzanna & Mohieldin, Mahmoud, 2020. "Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samdani, Taufique, 2024. "Disclosure rules, controlling shareholders, and trading activity in the new issues market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    3. Hu, Helen Wei & Cui, Lin, 2014. "Outward foreign direct investment of publicly listed firms from China: A corporate governance perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 750-760.
    4. Hongjin Zhu & Yue Pan & Jiaping Qiu & Jinli Xiao, 2022. "Hometown Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Corporations: Evidence from CEO Dismissals and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 283-310, March.
    5. Toru Yoshikawa & Abdul A. Rasheed, 2010. "Family Control and Ownership Monitoring in Family‐Controlled Firms in Japan," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 274-295, March.
    6. Ichiro Iwasaki & Satoshi Mizobata & Alexander Muravyev, 2018. "Ownership dynamics and firm performance in an emerging economy: a meta-analysis of the Russian literature," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 290-333, May.
    7. Omar Farooque & Wonlop Buachoom & Nam Hoang, 2019. "Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1111-1164, December.
    8. de La Bruslerie, Hubert, 2016. "Does debt curb controlling shareholders' private benefits? Modelling in a contingent claim framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 263-282.
    9. Ping Sun & Sheng Ma & Xinxin Xu, 2022. "Multi-Factor Collaborative Governance of Controlling Shareholder Expropriation Behavior in Emerging Economies: A Perspective of Double Principal-Agent Conflicts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    10. Vicente Lima Crisóstomo & Priscila Azevedo Prudêncio & Isac Freitas Brandão, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 243-263, November.
    11. Andre Leonardo Pruner da Silva & Jeferson Lana & Rosilene Marcon, 2018. "Agreeing and Impacting: The Effect of the Shareholders' Agreement on Firms' Market Value," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(1), pages 88-104, January.
    12. Marc Essen & J. Oosterhout & Michael Carney, 2012. "Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 873-905, December.
    13. Akihiro Yamada & Kento Fujita, 2022. "Impact of Parent Companies and Multiple Large Shareholders on Audit Fees in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Igor Goncharov & Sander Triest, 2014. "Unintended Consequences of Changing Accounting Standards: The Case of Fair Value Accounting and Mandatory Dividends," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(3), pages 341-367, September.
    15. Ahmed Aboud & Ahmed Diab, 2022. "Ownership Characteristics and Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Split-Share Structure Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Imani Mokhtar* & Sharifah Raihan Syed Mohd Zain & Jarita Duasa & Azhar Mohamad, 2018. "Blockholders and Firm Performance: A Malaysian Evidence," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 885-893:5.
    17. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    18. Jin-hui Luo & Xue Li & Linda C. Wang & Yue Liu, 2021. "Owner type, pyramidal structure and R&D Investment in China’s family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1085-1111, September.
    19. Gregorio Sánchez‐Marín & María Encarnación Lucas‐Pérez & Samuel Baixauli‐Soler & Brian G.M. Main & Antonio Mínguez‐Vera, 2022. "Excess executive compensation and corporate governance in the United Kingdom and Spain: A comparative analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2817-2837, October.
    20. Wang, Boya, 2018. "Ownership, institutions and firm value: Cross-provincial evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 547-565.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9245-:d:1505865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.