IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8913-d1498821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Potential Use of End-of-Life Fire Extinguisher Powder as a Soil Amendment in Different Soil Types: A New Approach Following a Circular Economy Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ioanna Tsigka

    (Soil Science Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Pedion Areos, 38334 Volos, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Kiatikidis

    (Soil Science Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Panagiotis K. Tsolakis

    (General State Chemistry Laboratory, Larissa Chemical Service, 21 Farsalon, 41335 Larissa, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Stergiou

    (Stergiou, Standard Fire Extinguisher Maintenance and Retreading Workshop, Yfantes Rodopis, 69100 Komotini, Greece)

  • Evangelia E. Golia

    (Soil Science Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

A first attempt to assess the potential alternative use of fire extinguisher filler powder after its exhaustion has been investigated in the present research. The chemical composition of fire extinguisher filler powder, specifically type ABC 40%, consists of monoammonium phosphate and ammonium sulfate. As its nitrogen and phosphorus content is particularly high, the thought of its possible use as a fertilizer and/or a soil amendment is a challenge. For this purpose, a pot experiment was carried out and two leafy vegetables (spinach and lettuce) were used as biomarkers. Two soil samples from rural areas, one acidic (pH = 5.8 ± 0.1) and one alkaline (pH = 8.2 ± 0.7), were selected for the experiments. Filler powder from a used fire extinguisher was added to the soil samples in two levels (1 and 2% v / v ). It was found that the addition of fire extinguisher filler powder caused no toxicity to either of the two plants studied. On the contrary, an increase in their above-ground biomass was observed, proportional to the amount of powder added. It was established that in the pots where the powder was added, in both plant species observed, the plant height, root length, and chlorophyll content of leaves increased, the total antioxidant capacity was enhanced, and the concentrations of nitrate and phosphate in the leaves and roots of plants also increased, compared to the soil without the addition of fire extinguisher powder. The early signs appear to be encouraging, as an increase was observed in almost all aspects. The mandatory end of the life cycle of the powder as a fire-extinguishing agent and its disposal is also a challenge in the context of the circular economy, as reducing the energy requirements for fertilizer production is one of the objectives of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioanna Tsigka & Nikolaos Kiatikidis & Panagiotis K. Tsolakis & Nikolaos Stergiou & Evangelia E. Golia, 2024. "Investigating the Potential Use of End-of-Life Fire Extinguisher Powder as a Soil Amendment in Different Soil Types: A New Approach Following a Circular Economy Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8913-:d:1498821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8913/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8913/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Mengru & Ma, Lin & Strokal, Maryna & Chu, Yanan & Kroeze, Carolien, 2018. "Exploring nutrient management options to increase nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in food production of China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 58-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang Yin & Zhanli Sun & Liangzhi You & Daniel Müller, 2024. "Determinants of changes in harvested area and yields of major crops in China," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(2), pages 339-351, April.
    2. Mengru Wang & Annette B. G. Janssen & Jeanne Bazin & Maryna Strokal & Lin Ma & Carolien Kroeze, 2022. "Accounting for interactions between Sustainable Development Goals is essential for water pollution control in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Xiaomin Yu & Haigang Li & Reiner Doluschitz, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Management of Mineral Fertilizers in China: An Integrative Analysis and Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Alvanitakis, Manon & Kleinpeter, Vivien & Vigne, Mathieu & Benoist, Anthony & Vayssières, Jonathan, 2024. "A substance flow analysis to assess the potential benefits of livestock based circularity for nutrient use efficiency and carbon return to soils in the agro-food-waste system of a tropical island," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Yifan Wu & Jingyu Liu & Yong Geng & Dong Wu, 2023. "Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency and Status of Phosphorus Reuse in China from 1990 to 2019," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Zhilu Sun & Xiande Li, 2021. "Technical Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer Use and Its Influencing Factors in China’s Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8913-:d:1498821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.