Author
Listed:
- Damian Iwanowicz
(Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7 Street, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
- Tomasz Krukowicz
(Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75 Street, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)
- Justyna Chadała
(Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7 Street, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
- Michał Grabowski
(Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7 Street, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
- Maciej Woźniak
(Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7 Street, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
Abstract
In traffic engineering, vehicle speed is a critical determinant of both the risk and severity of road crashes, a fact that holds particularly important for signalized intersections. Accurately selecting vehicle speeds is crucial not only for minimizing accident risks but also for ensuring the proper calculation of intergreen times, which directly influences the efficiency and safety of traffic flow. Traditionally, the design of signal programs relies on fixed speed parameters, such as the posted speed limit or the operational speed, typically represented by the 85th percentile speed from speed distribution data. Furthermore, many design guidelines allow for the selection of these critical speed values based on the designer’s own experience. However, such practices may lead to discrepancies in intergreen time calculations, potentially compromising safety and efficiency at intersections. Our research underscores the substantial variability in the speeds of passenger vehicles traveling intersections under free-flow conditions. This study encompassed numerous intersections with the highest number of accidents, using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct surveys in three Polish cities: Toruń, Bydgoszcz, and Warsaw. The captured video footage of vehicle movements at predetermined measurement sections was analyzed to find appropriate speeds for various travel maneuvers through these sections, encompassing straight-through, left-turn, and right-turn relations. Our analysis focused on how specific infrastructure-related factors influence driver behavior. The following were evaluated: intersection type, traffic organization, approach lane width, number of lanes, longitudinal road gradient, trams or pedestrian or bicycle crossing presence, and even roadside obstacles such as buildings, barriers or trees, and others. The results reveal that these factors significantly affect drivers’ speed choices, particularly in turning maneuvers. Furthermore, it was observed that the average speeds chosen by drivers at signalized intersections did not reach the permissible speed limit of 50 km/h as established in typical Polish urban areas. A key outcome of our analysis is the recommendation for a more precise speed model that contributes to the design of signal programs, enhancing road safety, and aligning with sustainable transport development policies. Based on our statistical analyses, we propose adopting a more sophisticated model to determine actual vehicle speeds more accurately. It was proved that, using the developed model, the results of calculating the intergreen times are statistically significantly higher. This recommendation is particularly pertinent to the design of signal programs. Furthermore, by improving speed accuracy values in intergreen calculation models with a clear impact on increasing road safety, we anticipate reductions in operational costs for the transportation system, which will contribute to both economic and environmental goals.
Suggested Citation
Damian Iwanowicz & Tomasz Krukowicz & Justyna Chadała & Michał Grabowski & Maciej Woźniak, 2024.
"Evaluation of Selected Factors Affecting the Speed of Drivers at Signal-Controlled Intersections in Poland,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8862-:d:1497912
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Li, Xiang & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2016.
"Effects of vehicle–pedestrian interaction and speed limit on traffic performance of intersections,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 335-347.
- Chuanyun Fu & Hua Liu, 2020.
"Investigating influence factors of traffic violations at signalized intersections using data gathered from traffic enforcement camera,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Huang, Yue & Li, Dewei & Cheng, Jianhui, 2021.
"Simulation of pedestrian–vehicle interference in railway station drop-off area based on cellular automata,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 579(C).
- Wang, Yan & Peng, Zhongyi & Chen, Qun, 2018.
"Simulated interactions of pedestrian crossings and motorized vehicles in residential areas,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1046-1060.
- Biao Yin & Monica Menendez & Kaidi Yang, 2021.
"Joint Optimization of Intersection Control and Trajectory Planning Accounting for Pedestrians in a Connected and Automated Vehicle Environment,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
- Li, Xiang & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2017.
"Studies of vehicle lane-changing dynamics and its effect on traffic efficiency, safety and environmental impact,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 41-58.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8862-:d:1497912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.