IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8684-d1494482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Global Resilience Analysis-Based Benchmark Framework for Comparing Reliability Surrogate Measures of Water Distribution Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Yuehua Huang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Bailin Luo

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Cross Research Institute of Ocean Engineering Safety and Sustainable Development, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Qianqian Zhou

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Cross Research Institute of Ocean Engineering Safety and Sustainable Development, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Zhiwei Zhao

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Cross Research Institute of Ocean Engineering Safety and Sustainable Development, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Various reliability surrogate measures have emerged over the last three decades to design water distribution systems. However, existing comparative studies cannot assess surrogate measures from the resilience perspective considering the dynamic absorption–recovery process imposed by pipe failures. In this work, we propose a novel benchmark framework based on the global resilience analysis to examine surrogate measures’ performance. Surrogate measures were compared via the stress–strain curve derived from the global resilience analysis under extended period simulation. In particular, we identify the comparable stress range to articulate the differences among surrogate measures and significantly reduce the computational burden. Then, we develop the normalized resilience score (NRS) to evaluate the quality of solutions to network design. Five well-known measures are compared for the multiobjective design of two benchmark networks. Results show that the Network Resilience Index achieves 2.5% to 10.1% better NRSs than the mean NRSs over five surrogate measures, implying that both nodal surplus energy and pipe diameter uniformity greatly impact the network system’s resilience. The uniformity of pipe diameters is more significant than the uniformity of flow rate. Our findings contribute to the design of new and better surrogate measures for network resilience evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuehua Huang & Bailin Luo & Qi Wang & Qianqian Zhou & Zhiwei Zhao, 2024. "A Global Resilience Analysis-Based Benchmark Framework for Comparing Reliability Surrogate Measures of Water Distribution Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8684-:d:1494482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raza, Nazia & Moazeni, Faegheh, 2024. "Chance-constrained vulnerability assessment of smart water distribution systems against stealthy false data injection attacks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    2. Salah Saleh & Tiku Tanyimboh, 2014. "Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems Based on Entropy and Topology," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3555-3575, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Sriman Pankaj & M. Naveen Naidu & A. Vasan & Murari RR Varma, 2020. "Self-Adaptive Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3129-3146, August.
    2. Tiku T. Tanyimboh, 2017. "Informational Entropy: a Failure Tolerance and Reliability Surrogate for Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 3189-3204, August.
    3. Alemtsehay G. Seyoum & Tiku T. Tanyimboh, 2016. "Investigation into the Pressure-Driven Extension of the EPANET Hydraulic Simulation Model for Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(14), pages 5351-5367, November.
    4. Calvin Siew & Tiku T. Tanyimboh & Alemtsehay G. Seyoum, 2016. "Penalty-Free Multi-Objective Evolutionary Approach to Optimization of Anytown Water Distribution Network," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3671-3688, September.
    5. Salah Saleh & Tiku T. Tanyimboh, 2016. "Multi-Directional Maximum-Entropy Approach to the Evolutionary Design Optimization of Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 1885-1901, April.
    6. Upaka Rathnayake & Tiku Tanyimboh, 2015. "Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimal Control of Combined Sewer Overflows," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2715-2731, June.
    7. Tiku T. Tanyimboh & Anna M. Czajkowska, 2021. "Entropy maximizing evolutionary design optimization of water distribution networks under multiple operating conditions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 267-285, June.
    8. Tiku T. Tanyimboh & Calvin Siew & Salah Saleh & Anna Czajkowska, 2016. "Comparison of Surrogate Measures for the Reliability and Redundancy of Water Distribution Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3535-3552, August.
    9. Mashor Housh & Alaa Jamal, 2022. "Utilizing Matrix Completion for Simulation and Optimization of Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Akbar Shirzad & Massoud Tabesh & Moharram Heidarzadeh, 2015. "A New Method for Quasi-Optimal Design of Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5295-5308, November.
    11. Tiku T. Tanyimboh & Anna Czajkowska, 2018. "Self-Adaptive Solution-Space Reduction Algorithm for Multi-Objective Evolutionary Design Optimization of Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(10), pages 3337-3352, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8684-:d:1494482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.