IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8680-d1494262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Romanian Internal Auditors in ESG Reporting and Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Simona Gherai

    (Department Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, University no. 1, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Diana Claudia Sabău Popa

    (Department Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, University no. 1, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Luminița Rus

    (Department Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, University no. 1, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Diana Elisabeta Matica

    (Department Finance-Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, University no. 1, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Codruța Mare

    (Statistics-Forecasts-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University Babeș-Bolyai, Strada Teodor Mihali, Nr. 58-60 Campus FSEGA, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an internal auditor’s activities in Romania, through their specific activities, on ESG reporting and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) are three criteria by which an organization’s operations are characterized as sustainable, responsible, or ethical. Even though, for business, the SDGs have been called “a 2030 purchase order for business and government action today”, the alignment between environmental, social, and governance performance and sustainable development goals helps practitioners in observing corporate contributions to sustainable growth. This research aims to identify whether internal auditors in Romania are able to contribute to ESG reporting and the achievement of the sustainable development goals through specific objective assurance and advisory activities. Using the questionnaire, the data were collected from professional accountants who carry out internal audit missions. The main findings confirm a strong and directly significant connection between the internal audit’s perception of the management’s view of the SDGs and how the entity can contribute to achieving the SDG objectives. The results also showed a direct and medium-intensity impact of the variables, capturing the important role of internal audits in ESG reporting. Our study showed that internal audits can help with reporting ESG and sustainable development objectives through their activity. However, according to our statistical results, the internal auditors do not offer at all (or rarely offer) objective assurance and counseling related to these subjects. Moreover, it is observed that, in these situations, the management does not have a clear vision and has not taken measures to achieve the sustainable development goals and ESG factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Simona Gherai & Diana Claudia Sabău Popa & Luminița Rus & Diana Elisabeta Matica & Codruța Mare, 2024. "The Impact of Romanian Internal Auditors in ESG Reporting and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8680-:d:1494262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li (Lily) Zheng Brooks & Susan Gill & Bernard Wong-On-Wing & Michael D. Yu, 2022. "Does audit firm tenure enhance firm value? Closing the expectation gap through corporate social responsibility," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1113-1145, September.
    2. Philomena Leung & Barry J. Cooper & Luckmika Perera, 2011. "Accountability structures and management relationships of internal audit," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(9), pages 794-816, October.
    3. Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks & Emma Hughes, 2016. "The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual’," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 371-382, November.
    4. Rainer Lenz & Ulrich Hahn, 2015. "A synthesis of empirical internal audit effectiveness literature pointing to new research opportunities," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 5-33, January.
    5. Rainer Lenz & Gerrit Sarens, 2012. "Reflections on the internal auditing profession: what might have gone wrong?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(6), pages 532-549, June.
    6. Marco Allegrini & Giuseppe D'Onza & Leen Paape & Robert Melville & Gerrit Sarens, 2006. "The European literature review on internal auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(8), pages 845-853, October.
    7. Darnall, Nicole & Seol, Inshik & Sarkis, Joseph, 2009. "Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations' use of environmental audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 170-187, February.
    8. Michael John Jones & Jill Frances Solomon, 2010. "Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 20-31, March.
    9. Jones, Michael John & Solomon, Jill Frances, 2010. "Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 20-31.
    10. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    11. Vikash Kumar Sinha & Marika Arena, 2020. "Manifold Conceptions of the Internal Auditing of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 81-102, February.
    12. Cezar FURTUNA & Adela CIUCIOI, 2019. "Internal Audit in the Era of Continuous Transformation. Survey of Internal Auditors in Romania," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(155), pages 452-452.
    13. Marc Eulerich & Christian Lohmann, 2022. "Information Asymmetries and Intra-Company Monitoring: an Empirical Analysis of Nonlinear Relationships Between Company Characteristics and the Size of the Internal Audit Function," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 103-127, March.
    14. Jaehong Lee & Suyon Kim & Eunsoo Kim, 2022. "Environmental Responsibility, Social Responsibility, and Governance from the Perspective of Auditors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    2. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2018. "Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 973-986, November.
    3. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang & Hanlu Fan & Jamie Ayers, 2023. "Corporate carbon assurance and the quality of carbon disclosure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 657-690, March.
    4. Steven DeSimone & Giuseppe D’Onza & Gerrit Sarens, 2021. "Correlates of internal audit function involvement in sustainability audits," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 561-591, June.
    5. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Owen, David & Unerman, Jeffrey, 2011. "Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 31-52, January.
    6. Diogenis Baboukardos & Musa Mangena & Abdullahi Ishola, 2021. "Integrated thinking and sustainability reporting assurance: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1580-1597, May.
    7. Thomas Kaspereit & Kerstin Lopatta, 2013. "The Value Relevance of SAM's Corporate Sustainability Ranking and GRI Sustainability Reporting in the European Stock Markets," ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 19 / 2013, ZenTra - Center for Transnational Studies, revised Oct 2013.
    8. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2017. "Voluntary Assurance of Voluntary CSR Disclosure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 205-230, February.
    10. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    11. Kılıç, Merve & Kuzey, Cemil & Uyar, Ali, 2021. "An international investigation on assurance of integrated reports: Institutions, assurance quality, and assurers," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    12. Orhan Akisik & Graham Gal, 2014. "Financial performance and reviews of corporate social responsibility reports," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 259-288, December.
    13. Warren Maroun, 2020. "A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 187-209, January.
    14. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2014. "The role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in a developing economy: Implications for IFRS," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 413-424.
    15. Abdulaziz A. Alomran & Kholod F. Alsahali, 2023. "The Role of Long-Term Institutional Ownership in Sustainability Report Assurance: Global Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    17. Estibaliz Goicoechea & Fernando Gómez-Bezares & José Vicente Ugarte, 2019. "Integrated Reporting Assurance: Perceptions of Auditors and Users in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Slack, Richard & Tsalavoutas, Ioannis, 2018. "Integrated reporting decision usefulness: Mainstream equity market views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 184-198.
    19. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    20. Ignace De Beelde & Sanne Tuybens, 2015. "Enhancing the Credibility of Reporting on Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 190-216, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8680-:d:1494262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.