IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8515-d1489398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment of a Plant Cell-Based Bio-Manufacturing Process for Producing Plant Natural Product Ingredients

Author

Listed:
  • Gbenga F. Oluyemi

    (School of Engineering, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, UK)

  • Richard O. Afolabi

    (School of Engineering, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, UK)

  • Samuel Casasola Zamora

    (Green Bioactives Limited (GBL), Douglas House, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0PL, UK)

  • Yuan Li

    (Green Bioactives Limited (GBL), Douglas House, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0PL, UK)

  • David McElroy

    (Green Bioactives Limited (GBL), Douglas House, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0PL, UK)

Abstract

Purpose: This study employed a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate the environmental impacts of a novel plant cell-based biomanufacturing process for producing plant natural product ingredients. The primary purpose was to assess the relative sustainability of the process and to provide insights into potential areas of improvement in the biomanufacturing process. Method: The LCA method used an MS Excel (Ver. 2407) -based approach with a cradle-to-gate system boundary covering raw material sourcing (A1), raw material transportation (A2), and product extract manufacturing (A3) stages. Energy use and material inventory data are presented for different unit operations, and environmental impact factors were obtained from the Ecoinvent database. The study included a Material Circularity Index (MCI) calculation to assess the circularity of the biomanufacturing process for the production of saponin emulsifiers that are normally extracted from the woody tissue of the Chilean soapbark tree ( Quillaja saponaria ). Comparative analyses were performed against a wild-harvest approach for plant tannin extraction from spruce ( Picea abies ) tree bark. Key Results: The environmental impact assessment focused on determining relative Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Freshwater Eutrophication (FE), Particulate Matter Formation (PMF), and Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP). Results indicated that the extract manufacturing stage (A3) contributed significantly to adverse environmental impacts, with varying levels of effects based on the energy source used. Comparative analysis with the wild harvest approach highlights the lower environmental impact of the alternative biomanufacturing process. The biomanufacturing process showed a 23% reduction in GWP, AP, and FE and a 25% reduction in PMF and ODP relative to the wild harvest approach. However, the MCI for the biomanufacturing process was estimated to be 0.186, indicating a low material circularity. Conclusions: The results revealed that the extract manufacturing stage, particularly energy consumption, significantly influences the relative environmental impacts of the alternative production processes. Different energy sources exhibit varying effects, with renewable energy sources showing lower environmental impacts. The Material Circularity Index indicated a low circularity for the biomanufacturing process, suggesting opportunities for improvement, such as incorporating recycled or reused materials. Compared with the tannin extraction process, the plant cell-based biomanufacturing process demonstrated lower environmental impacts, emphasising the importance of sustainable practices and the use of renewable energy sources in future plant natural product sourcing. Recommendations include implementing more sustainable practices, optimising raw material choices, and extending product life spans to enhance circularity and overall environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Gbenga F. Oluyemi & Richard O. Afolabi & Samuel Casasola Zamora & Yuan Li & David McElroy, 2024. "Environmental Impact Assessment of a Plant Cell-Based Bio-Manufacturing Process for Producing Plant Natural Product Ingredients," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8515-:d:1489398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Rocchi & L. Paolotti & C. Cortina & F. F. Fagioli & A. Boggia, 2021. "Measuring circularity: an application of modified Material Circularity Indicator to agricultural systems," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franco Fassio & Chiara Chirilli, 2023. "The Circular Economy and the Food System: A Review of Principal Measuring Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Arru, Brunella & Furesi, Roberto & Pulina, Pietro & Sau, Paola & Madau, Fabio A., 2022. "The Circular Economy in the Agri-food system: A Performance Measurement of European Countries," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(2), September.
    3. Aristea Kounani & Alexandra Pavloudi & Stamatis Aggelopoulos & Achilleas Kontrogeorgos, 2023. "Circular Assessment Tools: Assessing Circularity In Olive Oil Mills," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 50-55, April.
    4. Sarah Stempfle & Domenico Carlucci & Bernardo Corrado de Gennaro & Luigi Roselli & Giacomo Giannoccaro, 2021. "Available Pathways for Operationalizing Circular Economy into the Olive Oil Supply Chain: Mapping Evidence from a Scoping Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Prajapati, Dhirendra & Pratap, Saurabh & Zhang, Mengdi & Lakshay, & Huang, George Q., 2022. "Sustainable forward-reverse logistics for multi-product delivery and pickup in B2C E-commerce towards the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    6. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina & Paola Sau & Fabio A. Madau, 2022. "The Circular Economy in the Agri-food system: A Performance Measurement of European Countries," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(2), pages 1-35.
    7. Le Thanh Ha, 2024. "The nexus of financialization and circularity: Evidence from European economies," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(2), pages 950-985, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8515-:d:1489398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.