IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8355-d1485941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Spatiotemporal Variation in High-Quality Population Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Yanbing Gong

    (Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, China)

Abstract

High-quality population development is a crucial component of high-quality economic growth and holds significant importance for achieving sustainable development goals and advancing the process of modernization with Chinese characteristics. Combining theories of sustainable population development, and starting from the population elements subsystem and the population support subsystem, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system for high-quality population development by focusing on the following six key dimensions: population size, population quality, population structure, population distribution, population–socioeconomic relations, and population–environment relations. Utilizing the entropy weight–TOPSIS method, the study gauges the extent of high-quality population development within the Yangtze River Economic Belt spanning from 2013 to 2022. The temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and regional disparities of high-quality population development are depicted using methods such as natural breaks, the Dagum Gini coefficient, kernel density estimation, and spatial correlation analysis. Findings reveal the following: (1) The research region demonstrates a notable advancement in high-quality population development, with a gradient structure gradually emerging as “higher in the downstream areas, lower in the upstream regions, and central in the intermediary zones”. (2) The overall disparity exhibits a “V-shaped” upward trend, with significantly higher differences in downstream areas than in upstream and midstream areas. While intra-regional differences are decreasing overall, inter-regional differences are continuously widening, making them the primary driver of the overall disparity. (3) “High–High” and “Low–Low” spatial agglomeration effects are observed in the high-quality population development level within the area of investigation, with a trend towards bipolarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanbing Gong & Xin Liu, 2024. "Measurement and Spatiotemporal Variation in High-Quality Population Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8355-:d:1485941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Wang & Xianli Zhao & Qunxi Gong & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Measurement of Regional Green Economy Sustainable Development Ability Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis-Coupling Coordination Degree—A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Sagar, Ambuj D. & Najam, Adil, 1998. "The human development index: a critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 249-264, June.
    3. Yamaoka, Kazue, 2008. "Social capital and health and well-being in East Asia: A population-based study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 885-899, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeni Klugman & Francisco Rodríguez & Hyung-Jin Choi, 2011. "The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(2), pages 249-288, June.
    2. Rui Fragoso & Vladimir Bushenkov & Carlos Marques, 2012. "Integrated Water Management Using Feasible Goals Method and Interactive Decision Maps: The Case of Odivelas Irrigation," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2012_07, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    3. Albino Prada-Blanco & Patricio Sanchez-Fernandez, 2017. "Empirical Analysis of the Transformation of Economic Growth into Social Development at an International Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 983-1003, February.
    4. Christoph Dörffel & Sebastian Schuhmann, 2020. "What is Inclusive Development? Introducing the Multidimensional Inclusiveness Index," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-015, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    6. Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Chris Tofallis, 2013. "An automatic-democratic approach to weight setting for the new human development index," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 1325-1345, October.
    8. Maria Pavlova & Rainer Silbereisen & Kamil Sijko, 2014. "Social Participation in Poland: Links to Emotional Well-Being and Risky Alcohol Consumption," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 29-44, May.
    9. Robert Stewart & Murshed Chowdhury & Vaalmikki Arjoon, 2021. "Bank stability and economic growth: trade-offs or opportunities?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 827-853, August.
    10. Massimo Buscema & Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli, 2016. "Multidimensional Similarities at a Global Scale: An Approach to Mapping Open Society Orientations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1239-1258, September.
    11. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2021. "Augmented human development in the age of globalization," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(4), pages 946-975, November.
    13. Ülengin, Füsun & Kabak, Özgür & Önsel, Sule & Aktas, Emel & Parker, Barnett R., 2011. "The competitiveness of nations and implications for human development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-27, March.
    14. Elizabeth Stanton, 2007. "The Human Development Index: A History," Working Papers wp127, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    15. mashkoor, Aasim & ahmed, Ovais, 2015. "Theory of Economic Development (Pyramids of Economic Development)," MPRA Paper 63370, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Man Liang & Shuwen Niu & Zhen Li & Wenli Qiang, 2019. "International Comparison of Human Development Index Corrected by Greenness and Fairness Indicators and Policy Implications for China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Elspeth Hazell & Kar-Fai Gee & Andrew Sharpe, 2012. "The Human Development Index in Canada: Estimates for the Canadian Provincesand Territories, 2000-2011," CSLS Research Reports 2012-02, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    18. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2020. "Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Runhui Lin & Yuan Gui & Zaiyang Xie & Lu Liu, 2019. "Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Yi Shi & Mario Calabrese & Chiraz Aouina‐Mejri & Armando Papa, 2022. "Depicting the role of cross‐cultural legitimacy for responsible innovation in Asian‐Pacific business models: A dialectical systems view of Yin‐Yang harmony," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2083-2093, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8355-:d:1485941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.