IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p7993-d1477022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Statement Comparability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Uk Choi

    (Department of Accounting and Taxation, School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea)

  • Woo Jae Lee

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business and Economics, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study explores the effect of financial statement comparability on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Comparability is a qualitative characteristic that enhances the usefulness of accounting information, as emphasized in the conceptual framework of accounting standards. Reporting accounting information with high comparability reduces the cost of obtaining information for users of financial statements, thereby enabling them to make decisions more efficiently. However, increased comparability of financial statements may lead managers to avoid investments that do not directly and rapidly enhance corporate value. In the context of ESG, this behavior could lead to a reduction in ESG investments, thereby lowering overall ESG performance. This study empirically investigates this hypothesis by analyzing data from listed firms in Korea. The analysis reveals a negative relationship between the comparability of financial statements and ESG performance. When breaking down ESG performance into individual components, the environmental (E) and social (S) factors show a negative relationship with comparability, while no significant relationship is observed with the governance (G) factor. The results remain consistent across various additional tests, including the use of alternative comparability and ESG proxies, as well as when employing firm fixed effects models. The findings of this study highlight the potential adverse effects of financial statement comparability on ESG performance. These results suggest that while comparability facilitates better decision-making through enhanced information efficiency, it may inadvertently discourage managers from engaging in ESG investments, thereby negatively impacting a company’s sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Uk Choi & Woo Jae Lee, 2024. "Financial Statement Comparability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7993-:d:1477022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph H. Zhang, 2018. "Accounting Comparability, Audit Effort, and Audit Outcomes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 245-276, March.
    2. Ciao‐Wei Chen & Daniel W. Collins & Todd D. Kravet & Richard D. Mergenthaler, 2018. "Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 164-202, March.
    3. Min-Jung Kang & Seul-Gi Oh & Ho-Young Lee, 2022. "The Association between Outside Directors’ Compensation and ESG Performance: Evidence from Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    5. Basu, Sudipta, 1997. "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 3-37, December.
    6. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhuang & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Elmagrhi, Mohamed H., 2020. "Does accounting comparability affect corporate employment decision-making?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    2. Ding Ning & Irfan-Ullah & Muhammad Ansar Majeed & Aurang Zeb, 2022. "Board diversity and financial statement comparability: evidence from China," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 743-801, December.
    3. Fangjun Wang & Zhichao Zhang & Luying Xu, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and financial statement comparability: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1375-1394, May.
    4. Liem Thanh Nguyen & Khuong Vinh Nguyen, 2021. "Accounting Comparability and Cash Holdings in Vietnam," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, May.
    5. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:174-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Zhichao Zhang & Fangjun Wang, 2023. "Managerial short‐termism and financial statement comparability," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5027-5067, December.
    7. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Shijiao Cao & Jianqiong Wang, 2023. "Longitudinal accounting comparability and bond credit spreads: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1953-1981, June.
    9. Rodrigo Zeidan, 2022. "Why don't asset managers accelerate ESG investing? A sentiment analysis based on 13,000 messages from finance professionals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3028-3039, November.
    10. Wil Martens & Prem W. S. Yapa & Maryam Safari, 2020. "The Impact of Financial Statement Comparability on Earnings Management: Evidence from Frontier Markets," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Liu, Desheng & Wang, Yiqing & Li, Mingsheng, 2024. "Comparable but is it informative?Accounting information comparability and price synchronicity," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Kim, Junwoo & Kim, Robert & Kim, Sangwan, 2020. "Does financial statement comparability mitigate delayed trading volume before earnings announcements?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 62-75.
    14. Biehl, Henrike & Bleibtreu, Christopher & Stefani, Ulrike, 2024. "The real effects of financial reporting: Evidence and suggestions for future research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Borghesi, Richard & Chang, Kiyoung & Park, Jong Chool & Song, Hakjoon, 2024. "Labor unions and financial statement comparability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    16. Paola Demartini & Claudia Pagliei, 2023. "Can we trust ESG Ratings? Some insights based on a bibliometric analysis of ESG data quality and rating reliability," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 161-187.
    17. Edmonds, Mark A. & Smith, David B. & Stallings, Matthew A., 2018. "Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 103-111.
    18. D'Souza, Reagan & Ho, Choy Yeing (Chloe) & Yang, Joey W., 2024. "The cost of corporate social irresponsibility for acquirers," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Wang, Fangjun & Zhang, Zhichao & Ho, L.C. Jennifer & Usman, Muhammad, 2023. "CFO gender and financial statement comparability," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    21. Manganaris, Panayotis & Beccalli, Elena & Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis, 2017. "Bank transparency and the crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 121-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7993-:d:1477022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.