IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p7921-d1475595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being in European Union Countries in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Mikuła

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Raczkowska

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Monika Utzig

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted many countries’ economic, social, and political systems. The health and well-being sector has been particularly affected, necessitating unprecedented measures from governments globally. These measures were designed to safeguard societies from the virus and ensure the availability of healthcare services for those in need. This article assesses the implementation of the third Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)—good health and well-being—in European Union (EU-26) countries before and during the pandemic. The analysis aimed to answer two basic questions: (1) To what extent has the level of implementation of SDG 3 changed in individual EU-26 member states during the study period? and (2) During the analyzed period, has there been a reduction or deepening of disparities in the implementation of SDG 3 between the EU-26 countries? The study covers the years from 2019 to 2021, spanning the pre-pandemic period and its subsequent duration. The evaluation of the goal’s implementation was based on indicators monitored by Eurostat and employed the dynamic linear ordering method. The analysis revealed significant variations in SDG 3 implementation among the EU-26 countries. Over the analyzed years, The Netherlands and Sweden consistently occupied the top positions in the rankings, while Lithuania, Latvia, and Romania lagged. The pandemic adversely impacted the achievement of SDG 3, with a decline in the synthetic indicator value observed in 16 of the 26 EU countries. Comparing the first and second years of the pandemic, it was noted that negative changes were especially pronounced in 2021, with the synthetic variable value decreasing in 19 countries relative to 2020. The most significant declines in the synthetic variable value in 2021, compared to 2019, were recorded in Slovakia, Latvia, and Lithuania. In contrast, the greatest increases in the synthetic variable value, indicating notable progress in achieving SDG 3 despite the pandemic, were observed in Cyprus, Luxembourg, and Finland.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Mikuła & Małgorzata Raczkowska & Monika Utzig, 2024. "Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being in European Union Countries in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7921-:d:1475595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abi Adams-Prassl & Teodora Boneva & Marta Golin & Christopher Rauh, 2022. "The impact of the coronavirus lockdown on mental health: evidence from the United States," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 37(109), pages 139-155.
    2. Yeasmin, Sabina & Banik, Rajon & Hossain, Sorif & Hossain, Md. Nazmul & Mahumud, Raju & Salma, Nahid & Hossain, Md. Moyazzem, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Ana Gama & João Victor Rocha & Maria J. Marques & Sofia Azeredo-Lopes & Ana Rita Pedro & Sónia Dias, 2022. "How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Migrant Populations in Lisbon, Portugal? A Study on Perceived Effects on Health and Economic Condition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Björn Mestdagh & Olivier Sempiga & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2023. "The Impact of External Shocks on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Linking the COVID-19 Pandemic to SDG Implementation at the Local Government Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Barbara Fura & Qingfang Wang, 2017. "The level of socioeconomic development of EU countries and the state of ISO 14001 certification," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 103-119, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oyenubi, Adeola & Kollamparambil, Umakrishnan, 2023. "Does noncompliance with COVID-19 regulations impact the depressive symptoms of others?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Shumon Zihady, 2023. "Dupchanchia Model of Students' drop-out control through engagement and appreciation after Covid-19: A Behavioral Policy intervention in the field administration of Bangladesh," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 136-148, May.
    3. Jeong, Soyun & Fox, Ashley M., 2023. "Enhanced unemployment benefits, mental health, and substance use among low-income households during the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    4. Haleemunnissa, S. & Didel, Siyaram & Swami, Mukesh Kumar & Singh, Kuldeep & Vyas, Varuna, 2021. "Children and COVID19: Understanding impact on the growth trajectory of an evolving generation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Joanna Wyrwa & Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas & Anetta Barska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Development and Sustainable Social Development in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Bahal, Girish & Iyer, Sriya & Shastry, Kishen & Shrivastava, Anand, 2023. "Religion, Covid-19 and mental health," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. George Halkos & Stylianos Nomikos & Antonis Skouloudis, 2021. "Revisiting ISO 14001 diffusion among national terrains: panel data evidence from OECD countries and the BRIICS," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-803, October.
    8. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-03740701 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kristina Czura & Florian Englmaier & Hoa Ho & Lisa Spantig, 2023. "Employee Performance and Mental Well-Being: The Mitigating Effects of Transformational Leadership during Crisis," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 412, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    10. Molina, Teresa & Cho, Yoon Y., 2024. "The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times," IZA Discussion Papers 16737, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Dunfrey Pires Aragão & Andouglas Gonçalves da Silva Junior & Adriano Mondini & Cosimo Distante & Luiz Marcos Garcia Gonçalves, 2023. "COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Francesco Bogliacino & Cristiano Codagnone & Frans Folkvord & Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva, 2023. "The impact of labour market shocks on mental health: evidence from the Covid-19 first wave," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(3), pages 899-930, October.
    13. Ayṣem Mert & Elise Remling, 2023. "Changes in the practices and narratives of the United Nations High-Level Political Forum during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 123-132, June.
    14. Hu, Tao & Wang, Ying & Lin, Ling & Tang, Wanjie, 2021. "The mediating role of daytime sleepiness between problematic smartphone use and post-traumatic symptoms in COVID-19 home-refined adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Isis Kelly dos Santos & Rafaela Catherine da Silva Cunha de Medeiros & Jason Azevedo de Medeiros & Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto & Dianne Cristina Souza de Sena & Ricardo Ney Cobucci & Ricardo Santo, 2021. "Active Video Games for Improving Mental Health and Physical Fitness—An Alternative for Children and Adolescents during Social Isolation: An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Manuel Denzer & Philipp Grunau, 2024. "The impacts of working from home on individual health and well-being," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(5), pages 743-762, July.
    17. Berasategi Sancho, Naiara & Idoiaga Mondragon, Nahia & Dosil Santamaria, Maria & Eiguren Munitis, Amaia, 2021. "The Well-being of children in lock-down: Physical, emotional, social and academic impact," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Adam Pawlewicz & Katarzyna Pawlewicz, 2023. "The Risk of Agricultural Land Abandonment as a Socioeconomic Challenge for the Development of Agriculture in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    19. Malgorzata K. Guzowska & Barbara Kryk, 2020. "Implementation of the Social Goals of the Europe 2020 Strategy by EU Member States," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 58-74.
    20. Doua Ahmed & Pierina Benavente & Esperanza Diaz, 2023. "Food Insecurity among International Migrants during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-14, March.
    21. Hennebry Barraí & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Classification of Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Application of a Rural Development Index for Austria and Portugal," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 5-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7921-:d:1475595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.