IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7792-d1473188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating the Energy Performance Gap into Life Cycle Assessments of Building Renovations

Author

Listed:
  • Yanaika Decorte

    (Building Physics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Sint Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Marijke Steeman

    (Building Physics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Sint Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Nathan Van Den Bossche

    (Building Physics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Sint Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

The environmental impact of building energy renovation is commonly evaluated through life cycle assessment (LCA). However, existing LCA studies often overlook the energy performance gap—a substantial disparity between calculated and actual energy use—when estimating operational energy use before and after renovation. This paper examines the influence of the energy performance gap on the comparative LCA between unrenovated and renovated buildings. First, a statistical correction model, based on a recent large-scale Flemish study, is developed to correct regulatory calculated energy use for space heating and domestic hot water in a pragmatic way. Subsequently, the model is applied to four single-family dwellings with different energy characteristics that underwent renovation in accordance with Flemish energy regulations. The results show that the anticipated environmental savings over a 60-year study period decrease significantly when the correction model is applied, reducing the estimated savings of 49–80% to 21–49%. Moreover, environmental payback times increase from 2.9–9.1 years to 10.4–22.5 years. Notably, neglecting the energy performance gap in LCAs leads to systematic underestimations of the material use significance. This research underscores the importance of integrating the energy performance gap into LCAs to obtain more accurate estimations of the environmental benefits of energy renovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanaika Decorte & Marijke Steeman & Nathan Van Den Bossche, 2024. "Integrating the Energy Performance Gap into Life Cycle Assessments of Building Renovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7792-:d:1473188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2010. "Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1152-1160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    2. Vefago, Luiz H. Maccarini & Avellaneda, Jaume, 2013. "Recycling concepts and the index of recyclability for building materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 127-135.
    3. Jiménez Rivero, Ana & Sathre, Roger & García Navarro, Justo, 2016. "Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 171-181.
    4. Syed Shujaa Safdar Gardezi & Nasir Shafiq & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan, 2022. "Relational pre-impact assessment of conventional housing features and carbon footprint for achieving sustainable built environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8441-8463, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7792-:d:1473188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.