IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7476-d1466786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a Transnational Green Knowledge Commons for a Socially Just Sustainability Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Farley

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
    Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Dakota Walker

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
    Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Bryn Geffert

    (University of Vermont Dean of Libraries, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Nina Chandler

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Lauren Eisel

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Murray Friedberg

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Dominic Portelli

    (Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

Abstract

Humanity faces numerous deeply interconnected systemic risks to sustainability—a global polycrisis. We need economic institutions that produce the knowledge required to address this polycrisis at the lowest cost, maximize the benefits that knowledge generates, and distribute those benefits fairly. Knowledge improves through use; its value is maximized when it is freely available. Intellectual property rights (IPRs), a form of monopoly, direct knowledge production towards market goods, raise the cost of doing research, and reduce the benefits by price-rationing access. Building on theories of the commons, the anticommons, and market failures, we propose the creation of a transnational green knowledge commons (TGKC) in which all knowledge that contributes to solving the polycrisis be made open access on the condition that any subsequent improvements also be open access. We argue that a TGKC is more sustainable, just, and efficient than restrictive IPRs and well suited to the motivations and governance institutions of public universities. We show how a single university could initiate the process and estimate that the cost would be more than offset by reduced IPR expenses. A TGKC would reduce the costs of generating and disseminating knowledge directed towards a sustainable future and help stimulate the transnational cooperation, reciprocity, and trust required for sustainable management of the global biophysical commons.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Farley & Dakota Walker & Bryn Geffert & Nina Chandler & Lauren Eisel & Murray Friedberg & Dominic Portelli, 2024. "Creating a Transnational Green Knowledge Commons for a Socially Just Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7476-:d:1466786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gould, David M. & Gruben, William C., 1996. "The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 323-350, March.
    2. Jocelyn Timperley, 2021. "The broken $100-billion promise of climate finance — and how to fix it," Nature, Nature, vol. 598(7881), pages 400-402, October.
    3. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. James Bessen & Jennifer L. Ford & Michael J. Meurer, 2011. "The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls," Working Papers 1103, Research on Innovation.
    6. Holly Else, 2018. "Dutch publishing giant cuts off researchers in Germany and Sweden," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7715), pages 454-455, July.
    7. Heidi Ledford & Ewen Callaway, 2020. "Pioneers of revolutionary CRISPR gene editing win chemistry Nobel," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 346-347, October.
    8. Jeff Tollefson & Richard Van Noorden, 2022. "US government reveals big changes to open-access policy," Nature, Nature, vol. 609(7926), pages 234-235, September.
    9. Pierre-Bruno Ruffini, 2017. "Science and Diplomacy – A New Dimension of International Relations," Post-Print hal-02970666, HAL.
    10. Meredith Wadman, 1999. "Gore under fire in controversy over South Africa AIDS drug law," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6738), pages 717-718, June.
    11. Lei, Zhen & Juneja, Rakhi & Wright, Brian D, 2009. "Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for biological research," MPRA Paper 34640, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Berger, Sebastian, 2008. "K. William Kapp's theory of social costs and environmental policy: Towards political ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 244-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cbh:journl:v:14:y:2015:i:3:p:88-105 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Domicián Máté, 2015. "An analysis of the determinants of labour productivity in financial sectors in the context of intellectual property rights," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 14(3), pages 88-105.
    3. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    4. Rok Spruk & Mitja Kovac, 2018. "Inefficient Growth," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 9(2).
    5. Andrés, Antonio R. & Goel, Rajeev K., 2012. "Does software piracy affect economic growth? Evidence across countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 284-295.
    6. Asongu Simplice & Andrés Antonio, 2014. "Global trajectories, dynamics, and tendencies of business software piracy: benchmarking IPRs harmonization," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 14/011, African Governance and Development Institute..
    7. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James A., 2005. "Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 385-472, Elsevier.
    8. Fischer, Justina A.V., 2012. "The choice of domestic policies in a globalized economy: Extended Version," MPRA Paper 37816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Doytch, Nadia, 2022. "The impact of ICT patents on economic growth: An international evidence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    10. Robinson, James A. & Srinivasan, T.N., 1993. "Long-term consequences of population growth: Technological change, natural resources, and the environment," Handbook of Population and Family Economics, in: M. R. Rosenzweig & Stark, O. (ed.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 21, pages 1175-1298, Elsevier.
    11. Shteryo Nozharov, 2023. "Social costs of circular economy in European Union," Post-Print hal-04307150, HAL.
    12. Serkan Degirmenci, 2011. "Do Institutions Matter for Regional Economic Growth and Development? The Case of Turkey," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1180, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Fischer, Justina A.V., 2012. "The choice of domestic policies in a globalized economy," Papers 306, World Trade Institute.
    14. Park, Donghyun, 1998. "A proposal for measuring the benefits of policy-oriented social science research," Impact assessments 3, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, August.
    16. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    17. Lahsen, Amina. A & Piper, Alan T., 2018. "Property Rights and Intellectual Property Protection, GDP growth and Well-Being in Latin America," MPRA Paper 90034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & de Groot, Rudolf & Lomas, Pedro L. & Montes, Carlos, 2010. "The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1209-1218, April.
    19. Heinz Handler & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2006. "Teilstudie 7: Die Rolle des Staates," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27446.
    20. Danish Ahmed SIDDIQUI & Qazi Masood AHMED, 2018. "Institutionalized social technologies index: A global perspective," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(617), W), pages 67-96, Winter.
    21. Marchese, Carla & Marsiglio, Simone & Privileggi, Fabio & Ramello, Giovanni, 2014. "Endogenous Recombinant Growth through Market Production of Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201413, University of Turin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7476-:d:1466786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.