IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7472-d1466750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Green Bonds Help to Improve Enterprises’ Financing Efficiency? Empirical Evidence Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ruxing Lin

    (School of Urban and Regional Sciences, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
    Faculty of Economics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Guangcheng Ma

    (School of Urban and Regional Sciences, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jianhua Cao

    (School of Urban and Regional Sciences, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
    Institute of Finance and Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between green bonds and enterprises’ financing efficiency. A three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and a fixed effects model are used to achieve the research objectives. This paper analyzes the dual dimensions of theoretical analysis and empirical investigation. By fully considering the sub-stages of the financing process, it introduces green bonds into the analytical framework of financing efficiency issues. This paper uses data from China’s A-share listed enterprises from 2000 to 2022, uses a three-stage DEA model to measure the efficiency of each sub-stage of enterprises’ financing, and uses a fixed effects model for empirical testing. The study found that issuing green bonds can significantly improve the financing efficiency of enterprises, especially in the total and repayment stages. Furthermore, this paper uses the intermediary effect model to discuss the inherent mechanism of green bonds affecting financing efficiency. Green bonds promote the financing efficiency of enterprises and promote green transformation by affecting investor recognition and financing costs. However, the impact of green bonds is not obvious during the fund use stage and may be related to transparency and accountability mechanisms. This result indicates that expanding investor recognition, financing costs, and green transformation through green bonds is crucial to successfully promoting financing efficiency. The moderation effect model shows that the effect of green bonds issued by state-owned enterprises and highly polluting enterprises is more significant. This study highlights that green bonds positively impact financing efficiency and help promote sustainable economic development. This study also has policy implications for stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruxing Lin & Guangcheng Ma & Jianhua Cao, 2024. "Do Green Bonds Help to Improve Enterprises’ Financing Efficiency? Empirical Evidence Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7472-:d:1466750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Chien-Chiang & He, Zhi-Wen & Yuan, Zihao, 2023. "A pathway to sustainable development: Digitization and green productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Martiradonna, Monica & Romagnoli, Silvia & Santini, Amia, 2023. "The beneficial role of green bonds as a new strategic asset class: Dynamic dependencies, allocation and diversification before and during the pandemic era," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Serena Fatica & Roberto Panzica, 2021. "Green bonds as a tool against climate change?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2688-2701, July.
    4. Kamel Si Mohammed & Vanessa Serret & Christian Urom, 2024. "The Effect of Green Bonds on Climate Risk Amid Economic and Environmental policy uncertainties," Post-Print hal-04444957, HAL.
    5. Zhao, Linhai & Chau, Ka Yin & Tran, Trung Kien & Sadiq, Muhammad & Xuyen, Nguyen Thi My & Phan, Thi Thu Hien, 2022. "Enhancing green economic recovery through green bonds financing and energy efficiency investments," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 488-501.
    6. Muhammad Alamgir & Ming-Chang Cheng, 2023. "Do Green Bonds Play a Role in Achieving Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Bel, Germà & Joseph, Stephan, 2015. "Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 531-539.
    8. H. Fried & C. Lovell & S. Schmidt & S. Yaisawarng, 2002. "Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 157-174, January.
    9. Mascia Bedendo & Giacomo Nocera & Linus Siming, 2023. "Greening the Financial Sector: Evidence from Bank Green Bonds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 259-279, November.
    10. Criscuolo, Chiara & Menon, Carlo, 2015. "Environmental policies and risk finance in the green sector: Cross-country evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 38-56.
    11. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R., 2001. "The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2-3), pages 187-243, May.
    12. Mohammed, Kamel Si & Serret, Vanessa & Urom, Christian, 2024. "The effect of green bonds on climate risk amid economic and environmental policy uncertainties," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    13. Kaustia, Markku & Rantala, Ville, 2015. "Social learning and corporate peer effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 653-669.
    14. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    15. Giovanni Ferri & Li-Gang Liu, 2010. "Honor Thy Creditors Beforan Thy Shareholders: Are the Profits of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises Real?," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 9(3), pages 50-71, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Peiwen & Chen, Minghua & Wu, Ji & Yan, Yuanyun, 2023. "Do peer effects matter in bank risk? Some cross-country evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Yahya, Farzan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2023. "Disentangling the asymmetric effect of financialization on the green output gap," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Shen, Xieyang & Yang, Sijie & Chen, Yulin & Zeng, Jianyu, 2022. "How does economic policy uncertainty influence managers' learning from peers' stock prices? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Zheng, Ye & Tarczyński, Waldemar & Jamróz, Paweł & Ali Raza, Syed & Tiwari, Sunil, 2024. "Impacts of mineral resources, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental sustainability: Novel findings from global south region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Jun Lian & Xuanshun Huang & Xia Wu, 2024. "How green bonds promote firms' green collaborative innovation?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2109-2126, May.
    6. Chien Chi Chu & Xiu‐Fen Su & Yu‐En Lin & Akihiro Omura & Bin Li & Adrian Wai‐Kong Cheung, 2023. "Love thy neighbour: Evidence from capital structure decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 2907-2933, September.
    7. Ajirloo, Bahman Fathi & Switzer, Lorne N., 2022. "Self-disclosed peer effects on corporate capital structure," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Ulrike Malmendier, 2018. "Behavioral Corporate Finance," NBER Working Papers 25162, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Nhung Thi Nguyen & Mai Thi Ngoc Nguyen & Trang Thi Huyen Do & Truong Quang Le & Nhi Hoang Uyen Nguyen, 2024. "Hedging Carbon Price Risk on EU ETS: A Comparison of Green Bonds from the EU, US, and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Hirofumi Nishi & S. Drew Peabody, 2024. "Under the spotlight: The peer standard in CSR and the role of public attention," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 373-390, May.
    11. Seo, Hojun, 2021. "Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    12. Gyimah, Daniel & Machokoto, Michael & Sikochi, Anywhere (Siko), 2020. "Peer influence on trade credit," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Tim Martens & Christoph J. Sextroh, 2021. "Analyst Coverage Overlaps and Interfirm Information Spillovers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 1425-1480, September.
    14. Oh, Kwang Wuk & Kim, Hyun Ah, 2019. "Are inflated domestic credit ratings relative to global ratings associated with peer firms’ investment decisions? Evidence from Korea," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Si Mohammed, Kamel & Abddel-Jalil Sallam, Osama Azmi & Abdelkader, Salim Bourchid & Radulescu, Magdalena, 2024. "Dynamic effects of digital governance and government interventions on natural resources management: Fresh findings from Chinese provinces," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. André F. Silva, 2019. "Strategic Liquidity Mismatch and Financial Sector Stability," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-082, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    17. Qiyue Zhang & Yanli Wang & Qian Chen, 2024. "How Does Green Bond Issuance Facilitate the Spillover Effect of Green Technology Innovation in Industry? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Frank D. Hodge & Roger D. Martin & Jamie H. Pratt, 2006. "Audit Qualifications of Income†Decreasing Accounting Choices," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 369-394, June.
    19. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, April.
    20. Fogel, Kathy & Jandik, Tomas & McCumber, William R., 2018. "CFO social capital and private debt," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 28-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7472-:d:1466750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.