IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7270-d1462917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Development Level of Green Transportation in National Central Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Huan Yu

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, Xi’an 710100, China)

  • Qi Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Green transportation is the core embodiment of ecological civilization and the concept of green development within the field of transportation, and it is an important strategic choice for sustainable urban development. National central cities represent the highest level in China’s urban system planning. This paper aims to evaluate the level of green transportation development in national central cities. It established a set of 29 specific evaluation indicators from five dimensions: basic indicators, green transportation infrastructure, traffic environmental protection, traffic travel, and traffic safety. It constructed an evaluation index system for the development level of green transportation. The entropy weight TOPSIS method was utilized to evaluate the development levels of green transportation in nine national central cities from 2020 to 2022. An obstacle degree model was constructed to identify key obstacle factors at both the criterion and indicator layers of the green transportation development level evaluation index system for national central cities. Suggestions were proposed from five aspects: establishing a comprehensive policy framework, promoting regional collaborative development, accelerating infrastructure construction, improving transportation service quality, and fostering the green upgrading of industries. The results showed that the comprehensive ranking of green transportation development levels among the national central cities from high to low for the years 2020–2022 was as follows: Shanghai, Chongqing, Chengdu, Beijing, Guangzhou, Tianjin, Wuhan, Xi’an, Zhengzhou. In terms of the regional spatial layout, the green transportation development levels of the nine national central cities generally exhibited a “high on the periphery, low in the center” distribution characteristic. The comprehensive ranking of the obstacle degree in the criterion layer was as follows: basic indicators, traffic travel, green transportation infrastructure, traffic environmental protection, traffic safety. After screening the criteria level where the obstacle degree calculation results are above 15%, traffic safety is eliminated. The nine cities, which were located in different regions, generally maintained consistent internal obstacle factors and their order. The top five indicators with the highest frequency of obstacle degrees at the indicator layer were as follows: total passenger transport volume, number of taxis, new energy vehicle production, expenditure for transportation, and total freight transport volume. The specific key obstacle factors at the indicator level were different in the nine cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Huan Yu & Qi Yang, 2024. "Evaluation of the Development Level of Green Transportation in National Central Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7270-:d:1462917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony, 2017. "Alternate weibit-based model for assessing green transport systems with combined mode and route travel choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 291-310.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    2. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen & Sathaporn Opasanon & Suwicha Jaita, 2021. "A P-Hub Location Problem for Determining Park-and-Ride Facility Locations with the Weibit-Based Choice Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen, 2024. "Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with a Bounded Perceived Travel Time," Papers 2402.18435, arXiv.org.
    4. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot, 2022. "Weibit choice models: Properties, mode choice application and graphical illustrations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    5. Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea, 2020. "Mixing distributions of tastes with a Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) kernel: Formulation and performance analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Wang, Guangchao & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Ryu, Seungkyu & Qi, Hang & Song, Ziqi & Song, Jianguo, 2020. "A multi-modal network equilibrium model with captive mode choice and path size logit route choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 293-317.
    7. Tinessa, Fiore, 2021. "Closed-form random utility models with mixture distributions of random utilities: Exploring finite mixtures of qGEV models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 262-288.
    8. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Jang, Sunghoon, 2024. "Alternate closed-form weibit-based model for assessing travel choice with an oddball alternative," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony & Ryu, Seungkyu & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Xu, Xiangdong, 2024. "Modeling elasticity, similarity, stochasticity, and congestion in a network equilibrium framework using a paired combinatorial weibit choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Jun Tu & Juan Du & Min Huang, 2023. "Competition between Green and Non-Green Travel Companies: The Role of Governmental Subsidies in Green Travel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    11. Du, Muqing & Zhou, Jiankun & Chen, Anthony & Tan, Heqing, 2022. "Modeling the capacity of multimodal and intermodal urban transportation networks that incorporate emerging travel modes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Yang, Chao & Ryu, Seungkyu, 2018. "Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 68-85.
    13. Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Xinyuan & Meng, Qiang & Kim, Inhi, 2018. "Remote park-and-ride network equilibrium model and its applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 37-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7270-:d:1462917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.