IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7068-d1458493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Union: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Kountios

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Entrepreneurship, School of Agriculture, International Hellenic University, Sindos, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Spyridon Kanakaris

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Entrepreneurship, School of Agriculture, International Hellenic University, Sindos, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christina Moulogianni

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Thomas Bournaris

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) and the Farm Advisory Service (FAS) are important elements of the current Programming Period of the Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027), as it is now deemed necessary to transition the European agricultural model to more sustainable forms, through the dissemination of agricultural knowledge, while simultaneously promoting innovative methods. An Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System must be able to propose and develop ideas for the transmission of agricultural knowledge, promoting innovation and the exchange of ideas. The present study includes a significant number of investigations on the effectiveness of the implementation of the AKIS and the FAS so that the conclusions are representative of the scope of the work. The object in question is now the cornerstone of the modernization of agricultural production and an important way out towards more competitive models of agriculture. The purpose of this paper is to give an extensive overview of the degree of implementation of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in the countries of the European Union (including the United Kingdom until 2019) from 2014 until today, essentially during the implementation of the second period of Common Agricultural Policy. In the context of this article, the main results of the research carried out in the EU countries during the period under study and the proposed improvements by the researchers, where they are mentioned, are recorded epigrammatically. Finally, the countries are categorized according to the degree of implementation of the AKIS and the contribution of the Agricultural Advisory System to more sustainable forms of agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Kountios & Spyridon Kanakaris & Christina Moulogianni & Thomas Bournaris, 2024. "Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Union: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7068-:d:1458493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7068/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7068/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konecna, Marta Mrnustik, 2018. "The role of the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information in the Czech Agricultural Knowledge Information System," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 15.
    2. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "Governance of agricultural knowledge and innovation system (AKIS) in Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 112253, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Hermans, Frans & Geerling-Eiff, Floor & Potters, Jorieke & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88, pages 76-95.
    5. Pierre Labarthe & Monika Beck, 2022. "CAP and Advisory Services: From Farm Advisory Systems to Innovation Support," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(1), pages 5-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Torres-Avila, Angelica & Aguilar-Ávila, Jorge & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio & Martínez-González, Enrique Genaro & Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman, 2022. "Innovation in the pineapple value chain in Mexico: Explaining the global adoption process of the MD-2 hybrid," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Yehia Zahran & Hazem S. Kassem & Shimaa M. Naba & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2020. "Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Proposed Framework for Strengthening Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Andrea Arzeni & Francesca Giarè & Mara Lai & Maria Valentina Lasorella & Rossella Ugati & Anna Vagnozzi, 2023. "Interactive Approach for Innovation: The Experience of the Italian EIP AGRI Operational Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Ramírez-Gómez, Carlos Julián & Rodríguez-Espinosa, Holmes, 2022. "Local public-private partnerships to promote innovation in agricultural value chains: the case of cocoa in Colombia," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    6. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Jean Charles Ononino & Cyrille Bergaly Kamdem & Raymond Ekodo & Yannick Fosso Djoumessi, 2024. "Diffusion and adoption of agricultural innovations: the role of a market based on public-private partnership in Cameroon," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(3), pages 904-917.
    9. Tretiak, Anton & Tretiak, Valentina & Sakal, Oksana & Kovalenko, Andrii & Tretiak, Nataliia & Shtogryn, Halyna, 2020. "The value added chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership for the development of the land use economy of rural territories," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(3), September.
    10. Yu-Chen Yang & Yi-Chich Chiu & Cheng-Yih Hong, 2020. "Analysis of Cost-benefit and CO2 Emissions of Solar Energy-Intelligent Poultry Feeding System: Application of NPV and Dynamic Environmental I-O Model," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 178-184.
    11. Jiao Feng & Nannan Wang & Guoshuai Sun, 2022. "Measurement of Innovation-Driven Development Performance of Large-Scale Environmental Protection Enterprises Investing in Public–Private Partnership Projects Based on the Hybrid Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Paul Aseete & Andrew Barkley & Enid Katungi & Michael Adrogu Ugen & Eliud Birachi, 2023. "Public–private partnership generates economic benefits to smallholder bean growers in Uganda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 201-218, February.
    13. Margherita Masi & Jorgelina Di Pasquale & Yari Vecchio & Fabian Capitanio, 2023. "Precision Farming: Barriers of Variable Rate Technology Adoption in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2024. "Transition towards a bioeconomy: Comparison of conditions and institutional work in selected industries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50, pages 1-1.
    15. Cronin, Evelien & Fieldsend, Andrew & Rogge, Elke & Block, Thomas, 2022. "Multi-actor Horizon 2020 projects in agriculture, forestry and related sectors: A Multi-level Innovation System framework (MINOS) for identifying multi-level system failures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Oksana Lazor & Oleh Lazor & Nataliia Lutska & Ivan Krykhovetskyi & Kateryna Maistrenko & Agnes Olkova-Mykhnytska, 2022. "Formation and Implementation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in the Agricultural Sector," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 266-274, 10-2022.
    17. Asha Ally Hatibu & Essegbemon Akpo & Gerald Alex Lukurugu & Joseph Nzunda & Patrick Okori & Chris O. Ojiewo, 2022. "Upscaling Groundnut Seed Production and Delivery through Long-Term Public–Private and Development Organization Partnerships: Experiences from Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Ayrapetyan, David & Befort, Nicolas & Hermans, Frans, 2025. "From local markets to global legitimacy: A materialization perspective on technological innovation system's dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 54(1).
    19. Andreea-Emanuela Dragoi, 2023. "Quo Vadis the Common Agricultural Policy amid Tomorrow’s Challenges?," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 11(1), pages 24-31, May.
    20. Markow, Jekaterina & Fieldsend, Andrew F. & Münchhausen, Susanne von & Häring, Anna Maria, 2023. "Building agricultural innovation capacity from the bottom up: Using spillover effects from projects to strengthen agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7068-:d:1458493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.