IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6931-d1455251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Analysis with Environmental Justice Considerations: Case Study for Detroit

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Yuan

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Ji-Cheng Jang

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Shicheng Long

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yun Zhu

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Shuxiao Wang

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Jia Xing

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Bin Zhao

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, substantial studies have been conducted to assess the feasibility of a multi-pollutant strategy for managing air quality in the United States. Given the inherent complexity of multi-pollutant air quality challenges, including fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), ozone (O 3 ), and air toxics, this paper undertook a multi-pollutant analysis at both national and local levels. Our analysis incorporated O 3 and PM 2.5 concentrations, air toxics that increase the risk of cancer, environmental justice (EJ) data, emissions data, and monitoring data. Initially, we identified counties across the continental U.S. with heightened multi-pollutant exposures and EJ concerns. Subsequently, a case study within the Detroit metropolitan area was conducted, revealing a clear overlap between multi-pollutant and EJ issues, underscoring the disproportionate burden on disadvantaged communities. The analysis of detailed emissions data unveiled potential co-control benefits in this region. Lastly, employing a proximity analysis method, we assessed environmental issues surrounding points of interest such as monitoring sites and emissions sectors, in the Detroit metropolitan area. The results demonstrated that monitoring sites with the highest monitoring value, alongside top-ranked emissions sectors such as electric utilities, coke ovens, and iron and steel production, were likely to exhibit elevated air pollutant concentrations/risks and associated EJ concerns in their vicinity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Yuan & Ji-Cheng Jang & Shicheng Long & Yun Zhu & Shuxiao Wang & Jia Xing & Bin Zhao, 2024. "A Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Analysis with Environmental Justice Considerations: Case Study for Detroit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6931-:d:1455251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neal Fann & Henry A. Roman & Charles M. Fulcher & Mikael A. Gentile & Bryan J. Hubbell & Karen Wesson & Jonathan I. Levy, 2011. "Maximizing Health Benefits and Minimizing Inequality: Incorporating Local‐Scale Data in the Design and Evaluation of Air Quality Policies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 908-922, June.
    2. Jing Zhao & Laura Gladson & Kevin Cromar, 2018. "A Novel Environmental Justice Indicator for Managing Local Air Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Aubree Driver & Crystal Mehdizadeh & Samuel Bara-Garcia & Coline Bodenreider & Jessica Lewis & Sacoby Wilson, 2019. "Utilization of the Maryland Environmental Justice Screening Tool: A Bladensburg, Maryland Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Veronica J. Berrocal & Alan E. Gelfand & David M. Holland, 2012. "Space-Time Data fusion Under Error in Computer Model Output: An Application to Modeling Air Quality," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 837-848, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raoul S. Liévanos, 2019. "Racialized Structural Vulnerability: Neighborhood Racial Composition, Concentrated Disadvantage, and Fine Particulate Matter in California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. C. Forlani & S. Bhatt & M. Cameletti & E. Krainski & M. Blangiardo, 2020. "A joint Bayesian space–time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R‐INLA," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), December.
    3. Grineski, Sara & Collins, Tim & Renteria, Roger & Rubio, Ricardo, 2021. "Multigenerational immigrant trajectories and children's unequal exposure to fine particulate matter in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Hang Zhang & Yong Liu & Dongyang Yang & Guanpeng Dong, 2022. "PM 2.5 Concentrations Variability in North China Explored with a Multi-Scale Spatial Random Effect Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2012. "Why Income Inequality Indexes Do Not Apply to Health Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 192-196, February.
    6. Sam Harper & Eric Ruder & Henry A. Roman & Amelia Geggel & Onyemaechi Nweke & Devon Payne-Sturges & Jonathan I. Levy, 2013. "Using Inequality Measures to Incorporate Environmental Justice into Regulatory Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Rehana Shrestha & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2016. "Environmental Health Related Socio-Spatial Inequalities: Identifying “Hotspots” of Environmental Burdens and Social Vulnerability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Sharmila Bhandari & P. Grace Tee Lewis & Elena Craft & Skylar W. Marvel & David M. Reif & Weihsueh A. Chiu, 2020. "HGBEnviroScreen: Enabling Community Action through Data Integration in the Houston–Galveston–Brazoria Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Jiafang Song & Joshua L. Warren, 2022. "A Directionally Varying Change Points Model for Quantifying the Impact of a Point Source," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(1), pages 46-62, March.
    10. Niru Senthilkumar & Mark Gilfether & Francesca Metcalf & Armistead G. Russell & James A. Mulholland & Howard H. Chang, 2019. "Application of a Fusion Method for Gas and Particle Air Pollutants between Observational Data and Chemical Transport Model Simulations Over the Contiguous United States for 2005–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Esther Min & Deric Gruen & Debolina Banerjee & Tina Echeverria & Lauren Freelander & Michael Schmeltz & Erik Saganić & Millie Piazza & Vanessa E. Galaviz & Michael Yost & Edmund Y.W. Seto, 2019. "The Washington State Environmental Health Disparities Map: Development of a Community-Responsive Cumulative Impacts Assessment Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Suman Majumder & Yawen Guan & Brian J. Reich & Susan O’Neill & Ana G. Rappold, 2021. "Statistical Downscaling with Spatial Misalignment: Application to Wildland Fire $$\hbox {PM}_{2.5}$$ PM 2.5 Concentration Forecasting," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 23-44, March.
    13. Amy J. Schulz & Graciela B. Mentz & Natalie Sampson & Melanie Ward & J. Timothy Dvonch & Ricardo De Majo & Barbara A. Israel & Angela G. Reyes & Donele Wilkins, 2018. "Independent and Joint Contributions of Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Population Vulnerability to Mortality in the Detroit Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Meena, Kapil Kumar & Goswami, Arkopal Kishore, 2024. "A review of air pollution exposure impacts on travel behaviour and way forward," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 48-60.
    15. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Onyemaechi C. Nweke, 2011. "A Framework for Integrating Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Lutz Sager, 2023. "Global air quality inequality over 2000-2020," Papers 2307.15669, arXiv.org.
    18. Brian J. Reich & Howard H. Chang & Kristen M. Foley, 2014. "A spectral method for spatial downscaling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 932-942, December.
    19. Erin T. Mansur & Glenn Sheriff, 2019. "Do Pollution Markets Harm Low Income and Minority Communities? Ranking Emissions Distributions Generated by California's RECLAIM Program," NBER Working Papers 25666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Eum, Youngseob & Yoo, EunHye & Bowen, Elizabeth, 2019. "Socioeconomic determinants of pediatric asthma emergency department visits under regional economic development in western New York," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 133-144.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6931-:d:1455251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.