IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6592-d1447933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Quality Deterioration Index for Sustainable Quality Management in High-Tech Electronics Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Shimon Fridkin

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel)

  • Michael Winokur

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel)

  • Amir Gamliel

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel)

Abstract

In high-tech electronics manufacturing, non-quality costs significantly impact organizational profitability and competitiveness. This case study introduces a novel Quality Deterioration Index (QDI) to systematically identify and prioritize root causes of non-quality costs within a leading electronics manufacturer. The primary objective is to integrate sustainable quality management practices that align with green sustainability objectives, such as reducing electronic waste, improving energy efficiency, and minimizing hazardous materials usage. Our comprehensive methodology encompasses a literature review, interviews, document analysis, and statistical analysis of survey data to uncover the influence of procedural, cultural, and environmental factors on quality deviations. The key findings reveal critical areas for improvement, particularly in supply chain inefficiencies, workforce challenges, and procedural gaps. By employing the QDI, we provide a structured framework that enhances both operational efficiency and environmental performance. The novelty of this research lies in its dual approach to simultaneously address economic and environmental performance, offering actionable insights for manufacturers aiming to integrate robust quality management systems with sustainability objectives. This study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable manufacturing strategies, underscoring the pivotal role of quality management in achieving both economic viability and environmental stewardship. Future research should expand this approach across various industries and global contexts to validate and refine the integration of quality management and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shimon Fridkin & Michael Winokur & Amir Gamliel, 2024. "Development of a Quality Deterioration Index for Sustainable Quality Management in High-Tech Electronics Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-34, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6592-:d:1447933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johansson,Per-Olov & Kriström,Bengt, 2015. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Project Appraisal," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107121027.
    2. Christopher D. Ittner, 1996. "Exploratory Evidence on the Behavior of Quality Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 114-130, February.
    3. Johansson,Per-Olov & Kriström,Bengt, 2015. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Project Appraisal," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107548220.
    4. Long Zhao & Jianqiang Gu & Jawad Abbas & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2023. "Does quality management system help organizations in achieving environmental innovation and sustainability goals? A structural analysis," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 2484-2507, March.
    5. Yu, Ellen Pei-yi & Luu, Bac Van & Chen, Catherine Huirong, 2020. "Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Shweta Bajaj & Ruchi Garg & Monika Sethi, 2018. "Total quality management: a critical literature review using Pareto analysis," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(1), pages 128-154, January.
    7. Saveta Tudorache & Anca Bratu, 2007. "The costs of quality -potential growth source for the entity performance," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 6(1), pages 132-136, December.
    8. Yehiel Rosenfeld, 2009. "Cost of quality versus cost of non-quality in construction: the crucial balance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Florio & Francesco Giffoni & Gelsomina Catalano, 2020. "Should governments fund basic science? Evidence from a willingness-to-pay experiment in five universities," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 16-33, January.
    2. Per-Olov Johansson & Bengt Kriström, 2015. "On the Social Cost of Water-Related Disasters," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(03), pages 1-26.
    3. Johansson, Per-Olov, 2015. "Tradable Permits in Cost-Benefit Analysis," SSE Working Paper Series in Economics 2015:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    4. Zilian Deng & Xi He & Yingtao Chai & Ting-Kwei Wang, 2023. "An Investment Decision Model for Underground Urban Utility Tunnel Based on MIVES and Real Option Theory from a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    5. John Creedy & Hemant Passi, 2018. "Public Sector Discount Rates: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 51(1), pages 139-157, March.
    6. Gelsomina CATALANO & Massimo FLORIO & Francesco GIFFONI, 2016. "Willingness to Pay for Basic Research: A Contingent Valuation Experiment on the Large Hadron Collider," Departmental Working Papers 2016-03, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Johansson, Per-Olov, 2016. "On the Treatment of Emissions Trading and Green and White Certificates in Cost-Benefits Analysis," SSE Working Paper Series in Economics 2016:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
    8. Florio, Massimo & Forte, Stefano & Sirtori, Emanuela, 2016. "Forecasting the socio-economic impact of the Large Hadron Collider: A cost–benefit analysis to 2025 and beyond," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 38-53.
    9. Massimo FLORIO & Francesco GIFFONI, 2017. "Willingness-to-Pay for Science as a Public Good: A Contingent Valuation Experiment," Departmental Working Papers 2017-17, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    10. Florio, Massimo & Sirtori, Emanuela, 2016. "Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 65-78.
    11. Johansson, Per-Olov, 2016. "On lessons from energy and environmental cost–benefit analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 20-25.
    12. Per-Olov Johansson & Ginés de Rus, 2015. "On the Treatment of Foreigners and Foreign-Owned Firms in Cost–Benefit Analysis," Working Papers 2015-13, FEDEA.
    13. Paulson Gjerde, Kathy A. & Slotnick, Susan A., 2004. "Quality and reputation: The effects of external and internal factors over time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-20, May.
    14. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    16. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen, 2022. "Establishment of Corporate Energy Management Systems and Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure in Chinese Listed Companies: The Moderating Role of Corporate Leaders’ Low-Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Freiesleben, Johannes, 2008. "A proposal for an economic quality loss function," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 1012-1024, June.
    18. Xuan Chen & Liang Zhang, 2022. "Do negative environmental media reports increase environmental information disclosures? A comparative analysis based on political connections and market competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2480-2500, September.
    19. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6592-:d:1447933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.