IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6207-d1439209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturer’s Channel Strategy and Demand Information Sharing in a Retailer-Led Green Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiping Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Zhenkai Lou

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243032, China)

  • Xuming Lou

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of e-commerce, companies are increasingly focusing on their channel strategies to gain sustainable development. However, asymmetric demand information poses challenges to these decisions. This paper explores the interplay between a retailer’s information sharing strategy and a manufacturer’s channel strategy in a retailer-led green supply chain, where the manufacturer may establish an online channel to sell its green products directly. The dominant retailer has private demand information about the market and decides whether to share private information with the manufacturer. By establishing a game model, we analyze the impacts of information sharing and the manufacturer’s channel strategy on the payoffs for all the supply chain members, considering sustainability aspects such as the environmental benefits of green products and the efficiency of supply chain operations. The results show that information sharing benefits both the retailer and the manufacturer, irrespective of the establishment of an online channel. When the retailer shares demand information, opening an online channel benefits the manufacturer but benefits the retailer under certain conditions. Furthermore, through a numerical approach, we examine the strategic preferences of the firms and derive the equilibrium strategy. Interestingly, the manufacturer consistently prefers the scenario involving both an online channel and information sharing. The retailer’s preference, however, depends on the direct selling cost; it favors information sharing with or without an online channel based on this cost. Ultimately, our findings suggest that the equilibrium strategy can either be sharing information with an online channel or not sharing information without an online channel, which is contingent upon the direct selling cost and the forecast signal precision. These insights provide actionable strategies for enhancing the sustainability of supply chain operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiping Wang & Zhenkai Lou & Xuming Lou, 2024. "Manufacturer’s Channel Strategy and Demand Information Sharing in a Retailer-Led Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6207-:d:1439209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baojun Jiang & Lin Tian & Yifan Xu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share: Demand Forecast Sharing in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 800-809, September.
    2. Liang Guo & Ganesh Iyer, 2010. "Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 483-506, 05-06.
    3. Mailath George J. & Okuno-Fujiwara Masahiro & Postlewaite Andrew, 1993. "Belief-Based Refinements in Signalling Games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 241-276, August.
    4. Zhu, Wenge & He, Yuanjie, 2017. "Green product design in supply chains under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 165-180.
    5. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    6. Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2006. "Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 646-667, October.
    7. Ganesh Iyer & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Rakesh Niraj, 2007. "Information and Inventory in Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1551-1561, October.
    8. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Chen, Cheng-Kang & Ulya, M. Akmalul ', 2019. "Analyses of the reward-penalty mechanism in green closed-loop supply chains with product remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 211-223.
    10. Kyle Cattani & Wendell Gilland & Hans Sebastian Heese & Jayashankar Swaminathan, 2006. "Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 15(1), pages 40-56, March.
    11. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2011. "Disclosure standards for vertical contracts," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(3), pages 595-617, September.
    12. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    13. Amrouche, Nawel & Yan, Ruiliang, 2012. "Implementing online store for national brand competing against private label," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 325-332.
    14. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2015. "Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(1), pages 89-109, January.
    15. Heydari, Jafar & Govindan, Kannan & Aslani, Amin, 2019. "Pricing and greening decisions in a three-tier dual channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 185-196.
    16. Zhang, Shichen & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2020. "Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 134-151.
    17. Jafar Heydari & Kannan Govindan & Zahra Basiri, 2021. "Balancing price and green quality in presence of consumer environmental awareness: a green supply chain coordination approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 1957-1975, April.
    18. Huang, Song & Yang, Jun, 2016. "Information acquisition and transparency in a supply chain with asymmetric production cost information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 449-464.
    19. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Hongyan Shi & Yunchuan Liu & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2013. "Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1162-1176, May.
    21. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    22. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    23. Zhang, Shichen & Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2022. "Demand forecast sharing for a dominant retailer with supplier encroachment and quality decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 39-50.
    24. Kay-Yut Chen & Murat Kaya & Özalp Özer, 2008. "Dual Sales Channel Management with Service Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 654-675, June.
    25. Benny Mantin & Harish Krishnan & Tirtha Dhar, 2014. "The Strategic Role of Third-Party Marketplaces in Retailing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(11), pages 1937-1949, November.
    26. Lian Qi & Leon Yang Chu & Rachel R. Chen, 2016. "Quality Provision with Heterogeneous Consumer Reservation Utilities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(5), pages 883-901, May.
    27. Stephen Shum & Shilu Tong & Tingting Xiao, 2017. "On the Impact of Uncertain Cost Reduction When Selling to Strategic Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 843-860, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Zhang, Shichen & Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2022. "Demand forecast sharing for a dominant retailer with supplier encroachment and quality decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 39-50.
    3. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    4. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    5. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.
    6. Zhang, Ting & Feng, Xiaohui & Wang, Ningning, 2021. "Manufacturer encroachment and product assortment under vertical differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 120-132.
    7. Tong, Yang & Li, Lixu & Yang, Danqin & Jiang, Xia, 2023. "Impacts of online intermediary’s platform openness under asymmetric quality information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Yao, Yao & Zhang, Jianxiong & Fan, Xiaoqing, 2022. "Strategic pricing: An anti-encroachment policy of retailer with uncertainty in retail service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 144-157.
    9. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    10. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Yuqiu & Hua, Ye & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "Supplier or co-optor: Optimal channel and logistics selection problems on retail platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 971-988.
    11. Tong, Yang & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2024. "National or third-party manufacturer? Sourcing strategy of a dominant platform: Signaling game's perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    14. Mandal, Prasenjit & Jain, Tarun, 2021. "Partial outsourcing from a rival: Quality decision under product differentiation and information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 886-908.
    15. Liu, Yan & Shi, Hongyan & Petruzzi, Nicholas C., 2018. "Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution: Market size uncertainty effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1144-1158.
    16. Li, Jin & Wang, Haoyu & Shi, Victor & Sun, Qi, 2024. "Manufacturer's choice of online selling format in a dual-channel supply chain with green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 131-142.
    17. Shengliang Zong & Chunyang Shen & Siping Su, 2022. "Decision Making in Green Supply Chain with Manufacturers’ Misreporting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Long Gao & Liang Guo & Adem Orsdemir, 2021. "Dual‐Channel Distribution: The Case for Cost Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 494-521, February.
    19. Huiqi Guan & Zhibin Yang & Haresh Gurnani, 2023. "Value of information with manufacturer encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 780-793, March.
    20. Chen, Jing & Pun, Hubert & Zhang, Qiao, 2023. "Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 659-673.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6207-:d:1439209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.