IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v24y2024i4d10.1007_s10660-022-09620-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of information acquisition and sharing on an online intermediary platform

Author

Listed:
  • You Zhao

    (Guangdong University of Technology)

  • Jianxin Chen

    (Guangdong University of Technology)

  • Ping Shi

    (Guangdong University of Technology)

  • Rui Hou

    (Guangdong University of Technology)

Abstract

In practice, the online intermediary platform (e.g., JD.com and Amazon.com) not only acts as an e-tailer but also provides a marketplace for online retailers. This study investigates an online intermediary’s incentive for sharing private market demand information with the manufacturer when it is costly for the online retailer to acquire that information from the intermediary. We consider a hybrid-format supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, an online retailer, and an online intermediary. The online intermediary and retailer engage in Bertrand (price) competition. The retailer purchases products from the manufacturer and sells them through the online intermediary by paying an agency fee, while the online intermediary resells them as an e-tailer. Our findings indicate that the online intermediary may be willing to disclose market demand information to the manufacturer voluntarily under certain conditions. Interestingly, we find that when the information-acquisition cost is moderate, the retailer’s information-acquisition decision depends on the online intermediary’s information-sharing decision. Further, we demonstrate that sharing information is beneficial for the manufacturer, retailer, and online intermediary when the information-acquisition cost is moderate if and only if the competition intensity coefficient is low and the agency fee is high, or the competition intensity coefficient is high. However, when the information-acquisition cost is low or high, sharing information with the manufacturer would be detrimental to the retailer, i.e., a win–win–win outcome might not be achieved. These findings suggest that the three interacting forces of the information-acquisition cost, competition intensity coefficient, and agency fee steer equilibrium decisions for supply chain members.

Suggested Citation

  • You Zhao & Jianxin Chen & Ping Shi & Rui Hou, 2024. "The value of information acquisition and sharing on an online intermediary platform," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2849-2875, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09620-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-022-09620-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-022-09620-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-022-09620-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2001. "Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 629-646, May.
    2. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    3. Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2006. "Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 646-667, October.
    4. Ganesh Iyer & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Rakesh Niraj, 2007. "Information and Inventory in Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1551-1561, October.
    5. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    6. Li, Lode & McKelvey, Richard D. & Page, Talbot, 1987. "Optimal research for cournot oligopolists," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 140-166, June.
    7. Xiao, Lei & Xu, Minghui & Zheng, Jun-Jun & Huang, Song, 2020. "Inducing manufacturer’s quality enhancement via retailer’s acquisition strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Zhang, Shichen & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2020. "Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 134-151.
    9. Song Huang & Xu Guan & Ying†Ju Chen, 2018. "Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1133-1147, June.
    10. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    11. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    12. Lu, Qihui & Shi, Victor & Huang, Jiazhou, 2018. "Who benefit from agency model: A strategic analysis of pricing models in distribution channels of physical books and e-books," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1074-1091.
    13. Xu Guan & Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "The Interplay between Information Acquisition and Quality Disclosure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 389-408, March.
    14. Liang Guo & Ganesh Iyer, 2010. "Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 483-506, 05-06.
    15. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong & Hongtao Zhang, 2011. "Sharing Demand Information in Competing Supply Chains with Production Diseconomies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 566-581, March.
    16. Guo Li & Hong Zheng & Mengqi Liu, 2020. "Reselling or drop shipping: Strategic analysis of E-commerce dual-channel structures," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 475-508, September.
    17. Liang Guo, 2009. "The Benefits of Downstream Information Acquisition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 457-471, 05-06.
    18. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    19. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.
    20. Benny Mantin & Harish Krishnan & Tirtha Dhar, 2014. "The Strategic Role of Third-Party Marketplaces in Retailing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(11), pages 1937-1949, November.
    21. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    22. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    23. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2008. "Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 701-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    2. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.
    3. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    4. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Liang, Lunhai & Ye, Fei, 2024. "Information transparency and business mode selection in online platforms under manufacturer competition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Shi, Jia & Chu, Lap Keung & Luo, Huajiang, 2023. "Voluntary information disclosure of an e-commerce platform under reselling, marketplace, and hybrid selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Tong, Yang & Li, Lixu & Yang, Danqin & Jiang, Xia, 2023. "Impacts of online intermediary’s platform openness under asymmetric quality information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    9. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    10. Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2023. "Gaining by ceding ‐ bounded wholesale pricing for information sharing in a supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 829-843, March.
    11. Zhong, Qinjia & Wang, Jianjun & Zou, Zongbao & Lai, Xiaofan, 2023. "The incentives for information sharing in online retail platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Zhang, Jian & Nault, Barrie R., 2023. "Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 97-112.
    13. Zhang, Chu & Liu, Bin & Cai, Gangshu George & Huang, Tao, 2023. "When ignorance is bliss: The retailer’s intelligence hazard under information sharing and exchanging," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Jianghua Wu & Yuan Xue & Jiahao Yu, 2024. "A strategic analysis of timing of wholesale pricing and information sharing strategy in dual-channel retailing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1219-1240, July.
    17. Chen, Jing & Pun, Hubert & Zhang, Qiao, 2023. "Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 659-673.
    18. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    19. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    20. Zhang, Xumei & Zha, Xiaoyu & Dan, Bin & Liu, Yi & Sui, Ronghua, 2024. "Logistics mode selection and information sharing in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain with competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 136-151.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09620-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.