IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6175-d1438577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interplay between Digital Technologies, Supply Chain Resilience, Robustness and Sustainable Environmental Performance: Does Supply Chain Complexity Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt)

  • Hesham Ali Ahmed Ali

    (College of Accountancy, Finance and Economics, Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK
    Department of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, Aswan University, Aswan 81528, Egypt)

  • Saleh Aly Saleh Aly

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Ali Shabeeb Ali

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
    Accounting Department, Faculty of Commerce, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the mediating role of supply chain resilience and robustness on the relationship between the use of digital technologies and sustainable environmental performance. Additionally, it investigates the moderating role of supply chain complexity on the impact of digital technologies on supply chain resilience and robustness. Data were gathered from 292 supply chain managers at registered manufacturing companies in Egypt and analyzed using Smart-PLS 4 software. The findings reveal that supply chain resilience and robustness partially mediate the link between digital technologies and sustainable environmental performance. Moreover, supply chain complexity was found to positively moderate the effect of digital technologies on both resilience and robustness. The model explained 53.2% of the variance in supply chain robustness, 56.6% in supply chain resilience, and 72.3% in sustainable environmental performance. These results provide critical insights for corporate policymaking, helping to drive continuous improvements in supply chain management, environmental performance, and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally & Hesham Ali Ahmed Ali & Saleh Aly Saleh Aly & Mohamed Ali Shabeeb Ali, 2024. "The Interplay between Digital Technologies, Supply Chain Resilience, Robustness and Sustainable Environmental Performance: Does Supply Chain Complexity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6175-:d:1438577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgan, Glenn, 2007. "National business systems research: Progress and prospects," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 127-145, June.
    2. Naseeb, Hala & Metwally, Abdelmoneim, 2022. "Outsourcing insurance in the time of COVID-19: The cyber risk dilemma," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 15(2), pages 155-160, March.
    3. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    4. Emma Brandon-Jones & Brian Squire & Chad W. Autry & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2014. "A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 55-73, July.
    5. Joshi, Aditi D. & Gupta, Surendra M., 2019. "Evaluation of design alternatives of End-Of-Life products using internet of things," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 281-293.
    6. Curran, R. & Gomis, G. & Castagne, S. & Butterfield, J. & Edgar, T. & Higgins, C. & McKeever, C., 2007. "Integrated digital design for manufacture for reduced life cycle cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 27-40, September.
    7. Klibi, Walid & Martel, Alain & Guitouni, Adel, 2010. "The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 283-293, June.
    8. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2015. "Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 445-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Shaker Salem Abuzawida & Ahmad Bassam Alzubi & Kolawole Iyiola, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Practices: An Empirical Investigation from the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    4. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Yasmina Ziad, 2021. "Improving Supply Chain Robustness & Resilience? Lessons from a case study in the automotive industry during the first wave of Covid-19," Post-Print hal-03306223, HAL.
    5. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2021. "OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Alvarenga, Murilo Zamboni & Oliveira, Marcos Paulo Valadares de & Oliveira, Tiago, 2023. "Let’s talk about bad experiences instead of forgetting them: An empirical study on the importance of memory for supply chain disruption management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Alok Raj & Anand Jeyaraj, 2023. "Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: A meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 101-124, March.
    8. Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Stephen J. Childe & Thanos Papadopoulos & Zongwei Luo & David Roubaud, 2020. "Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 343-367, July.
    9. Afraz, Muhammad Fawad & Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain & Ferraris, Alberto & Couturier, Jerome, 2021. "The impact of supply chain innovation on competitive advantage in the construction industry: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Nina Shin & Sangwook Park, 2019. "Evidence-Based Resilience Management for Supply Chain Sustainability: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Brusset, Xavier & Teller, Christoph, 2017. "Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 59-68.
    12. K. T. Shibin & Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Benjamin Hazen & David Roubaud & Shivam Gupta & Cyril Foropon, 2020. "Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 301-326, July.
    13. Huang, Kerry & Wang, Kedi & Lee, Peter K.C. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    14. Muhammad Altaf & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Abdul Hannan Qureshi, 2023. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12071-12118, November.
    15. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    16. Tapio Riepponen & Mikko Moilanen & Jaakko Simonen, 2023. "Themes of resilience in the economics literature: A topic modeling approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 326-356, April.
    17. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Michal Gluszak & Remigiusz Gawlik & Malgorzata Zieba, 2019. "Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6175-:d:1438577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.