IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v188y2024ics136655452400200x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building resilience or maintaining robustness: Insights from relational view and information processing perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Hua
  • Xu, Xiaoping
  • Cheng, T.C.E.
  • Yu, Yugang

Abstract

Drawing upon the relational view and information processing perspective, we investigate how supply chain integration (SCI) comprising supplier integration and customer integration influence supply chain risk management (SCRM) practices embracing supply chain (SC) resilience and supply chain (SC) robustness, and subsequently influence supply chain (SC) performance. We further examine how big data analytics (BDA)-enabled agility moderates the impacts of SCI on SC resilience and SC robustness. Based on data collected from 121 match-paired surveys of manufacturing firms in China, we find that supplier integration positively impacts SC resilience, whereas customer integration positively impacts on SC robustness. BDA-enabled agility complements supplier integration while substitutes customer integration to improve SC resilience and SC robustness. Besides, our results reveal that SC resilience and SC robustness both improve SC performance, and SC robustness mediates the relationship between SC resilience and SC performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Hua & Xu, Xiaoping & Cheng, T.C.E. & Yu, Yugang, 2024. "Building resilience or maintaining robustness: Insights from relational view and information processing perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s136655452400200x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452400200X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s136655452400200x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.