IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5592-d1425814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handheld In Situ Methods for Soil Organic Carbon Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Loria

    (CFAES Rattan Lal Center for Carbon Management and Sequestration, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Rattan Lal

    (CFAES Rattan Lal Center for Carbon Management and Sequestration, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Ranveer Chandra

    (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052, USA)

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) assessment is crucial for evaluating soil health and supporting carbon sequestration efforts. Traditional methods like wet digestion and dry combustion are time-consuming and labor-intensive, necessitating the development of non-destructive, cost-efficient, and real-time in situ measurements. This review focuses on handheld in situ methodologies for SOC estimation, underscoring their practicality and reasonable accuracy. Spectroscopic techniques, like visible and near-infrared, mid-infrared, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, and inelastic neutron scattering each offer unique advantages. Preprocessing techniques, such as external parameter orthogonalization and standard normal variate, are employed to eliminate soil moisture content and particle size effects on SOC estimation. Calibration methods, like partial least squares regression and support vector machine, establish relationships between spectral reflectance, soil properties, and SOC. Among the 32 studies selected in this review, 14 exhibited a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.80 or higher, indicating the potential for accurate SOC content estimation using in situ approaches. Each study meticulously adjusted factors such as spectral range, pretreatment method, and calibration model to improve the accuracy of SOC content, highlighting both the methodological diversity and a continuous pursuit of precision in direct field measurements. Continued research and validation are imperative to ensure accurate in situ SOC assessment across diverse environments. Thus, this review underscores the potential of handheld devices for in situ SOC estimation with good accuracy and leveraging factors that influence its precision. Crucial for optimizing carbon farming, these devices offer real-time soil measurements, empowering land managers to enhance carbon sequestration and promote sustainable land management across diverse agricultural landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Loria & Rattan Lal & Ranveer Chandra, 2024. "Handheld In Situ Methods for Soil Organic Carbon Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-35, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5592-:d:1425814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelia Rumpel & Farshad Amiraslani & Lydie-Stella Koutika & Pete Smith & David Whitehead & Eva Wollenberg, 2018. "Put more carbon in soils to meet Paris climate pledges," Nature, Nature, vol. 564(7734), pages 32-34, December.
    2. Maggie R. Davis & Bruno J. R. Alves & Douglas L. Karlen & Keith L. Kline & Marcelo Galdos & Dana Abulebdeh, 2017. "Review of Soil Organic Carbon Measurement Protocols: A US and Brazil Comparison and Recommendation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Giacomo Crucil & Fabio Castaldi & Emilien Aldana-Jague & Bas van Wesemael & Andy Macdonald & Kristof Van Oost, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of UAS-Compatible Multispectral and Hyperspectral Sensors for Soil Organic Carbon Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelica Melone & Leah L. Bremer & Susan E. Crow & Zoe Hastings & Kawika B. Winter & Tamara Ticktin & Yoshimi M. Rii & Maile Wong & Kānekoa Kukea-Shultz & Sheree J. Watson & Clay Trauernicht, 2021. "Assessing Baseline Carbon Stocks for Forest Transitions: A Case Study of Agroforestry Restoration from Hawaiʻi," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Katerina Georgiou & Robert B. Jackson & Olga Vindušková & Rose Z. Abramoff & Anders Ahlström & Wenting Feng & Jennifer W. Harden & Adam F. A. Pellegrini & H. Wayne Polley & Jennifer L. Soong & William, 2022. "Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Feng, Jing-Chun & Sun, Liwei & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Carbon sequestration via shellfish farming: A potential negative emissions technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Vasileios Tsolis & Pantelis Barouchas, 2023. "Biochar as Soil Amendment: The Effect of Biochar on Soil Properties Using VIS-NIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy, Biochar Aging and Soil Microbiology—A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Ana Andries & Stephen Morse & Richard J. Murphy & Jim Lynch & Bernardo Mota & Emma R. Woolliams, 2021. "Can Current Earth Observation Technologies Provide Useful Information on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Land Management Policy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Theodora Angelopoulou & Athanasios Balafoutis & George Zalidis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "From Laboratory to Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Guopeng Liang & John Stark & Bonnie Grace Waring, 2023. "Mineral reactivity determines root effects on soil organic carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. June Sekera & Andreas Lichtenberger, 2020. "Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Sandra Duarte-Guardia & Pablo Peri & Wulf Amelung & Evert Thomas & Nils Borchard & German Baldi & Annette Cowie & Brenton Ladd, 2020. "Biophysical and socioeconomic factors influencing soil carbon stocks: a global assessment," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1129-1148, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5592-:d:1425814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.