IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5524-d1424725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Synergistic Effects of Walking Accessibility and the Built Environment on Street Vitality in High-Speed Railway Station Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Jianke Cheng

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Liyang Hu

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Jinyang Zhang

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Da Lei

    (Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The high-speed railway (HSR) has profoundly influenced individuals’ lifestyles and travel behaviors. The development of HSR stations and their surrounding areas plays a critical role in urban growth, enhancing both transport efficiency and urban functionality. This study investigates the development of HSR station areas, with a particular focus on Shanghai Hongqiao station, emphasizing the enhancement of street vitality as essential for integrated urban development. Street vitality in station areas is closely associated with individuals’ activities and travel behaviors, influenced by walking accessibility and the built environment. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving the efficiency and attractiveness of HSR station areas. Although extensive research has examined the separate impacts of the built environment and walking accessibility on street vitality, a significant gap remains in comprehending their synergistic effects. This study employs GPS and point-of-interest (POI) data to analyze the stay time of HSR passengers in station areas. Utilizing machine learning algorithms and geographic information system (GIS) tools, this research models the impact of walking accessibility and the built environment on passengers’ stay time. The results indicate that passengers are more inclined to remain within areas accessible by a 7 min walk from the station. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of walking accessibility and the built environment can inform the spatial planning of various functions. These findings provide valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers aiming to enhance the development and efficiency of HSR station areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianke Cheng & Liyang Hu & Jinyang Zhang & Da Lei, 2024. "Understanding the Synergistic Effects of Walking Accessibility and the Built Environment on Street Vitality in High-Speed Railway Station Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5524-:d:1424725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kay Axhausen & Andrea Zimmermann & Stefan Schönfelder & Guido Rindsfüser & Thomas Haupt, 2002. "Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 95-124, May.
    2. Mi Diao & Yi Zhu & Jiren Zhu, 2017. "Intra-city access to inter-city transport nodes: The implications of high-speed-rail station locations for the urban development of Chinese cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(10), pages 2249-2267, August.
    3. Tianzhi Liu & Fen Luo & Jiawen He, 2023. "Evolution of Spatial Structure of Tourist Flows for a Domestic Destination: A Case Study of Zhangjiajie, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Sungduck Lee & Emily Talen, 2014. "Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 368-388, May.
    5. Zhen Chen & Wei Fan, 2021. "A Freeway Travel Time Prediction Method Based on an XGBoost Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xueli & Jiang, Chunxia & Wang, Feng & Yao, Shujie, 2021. "The impact of high-speed railway on urban housing prices in China: A network accessibility perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 84-99.
    2. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    3. Edmond Daramy-Williams & Jillian Anable & Susan Grant-Muller, 2019. "Car Use: Intentional, Habitual, or Both? Insights from Anscombe and the Mobility Biography Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Heinen, Eva & Chatterjee, Kiron, 2015. "The same mode again? An exploration of mode choice variability in Great Britain using the National Travel Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 266-282.
    5. Wang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Yaojun & Yu, Danlin & Qi, Jinghan & Li, Shujing, 2022. "Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Makoto Chikaraishi & Akimasa Fujiwara & Junyi Zhang & Kay Axhausen, 2011. "Identifying variations and co-variations in discrete choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 993-1016, November.
    7. Taotao Deng & Chen Gan & Yukun Hu, 2021. "Do hotel business benefit from increased tourist accessibility? Evidence from China’s high-speed railway program," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1357-1374, November.
    8. Deng, Taotao & Wang, Dandan & Hu, Yukun & Liu, Shuang, 2020. "Did high-speed railway cause urban space expansion? ——Empirical evidence from China's prefecture-level cities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Benjamin Motte-Baumvol & Julie Fen-Chong & Olivier Bonin, 2023. "Immobility in a weekly mobility routine: studying the links between mobile and immobile days for employees and retirees," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1723-1742, October.
    10. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    11. Diao, Mi, 2018. "Does growth follow the rail? The potential impact of high-speed rail on the economic geography of China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 279-290.
    12. Fabian Märki & David Charypar & Kay Axhausen, 2014. "Agent-based model for continuous activity planning with an open planning horizon," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 905-922, July.
    13. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Zhai, Wei & Bai, Xueyin & Peng, Zhong-ren & Gu, Chaolin, 2019. "From edit distance to augmented space-time-weighted edit distance: Detecting and clustering patterns of human activities in Puget Sound region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 41-55.
    15. Andre De Palma & Fay Dunkerley & Stef Proost, 2010. "Trip Chaining: Who Wins Who Loses?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 223-258, March.
    16. Jiri Zuzanek, 2009. "Time use research in Canada – History,critique, perspectives," electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)) and The International Association for Time Use Research (IATUR), vol. 6(2), pages 178-192, September.
    17. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. María Yáñez & Patricio Mansilla & Juan de Ortúzar, 2010. "The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 125-149, January.
    19. Ahmad Termida, Nursitihazlin & Susilo, Yusak O. & Franklin, Joel P., 2016. "Observing dynamic behavioural responses due to the extension of a tram line by using panel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 78-95.
    20. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5524-:d:1424725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.