IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5452-d1423169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitical Risk and Ownership Decision in Green Overseas Investment: Dual Moderation of Corporate Green Technology Capability and Host Green Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxi Tang

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

  • Xiaojun Du

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

Abstract

In pursuit of green, low-carbon, and sustainable development, Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries urgently require overseas investment in green projects. However, these investments face significant geopolitical risk (GPR) challenges. This study thoroughly investigates how GPR influences the foreign ownership decisions of Chinese enterprises investing in green projects in BRI countries. It further examines the dual moderating effects of corporate green technology capability and host green governance on this relationship. Empirical analysis was conducted using the fractional logit model, analyzing green overseas investment data from Chinese listed companies spanning from 2013 to 2022. The findings revealed the following: (1) high GPR leads Chinese enterprises to opt for low-ownership entry modes in their BRI green investments; (2) the negative impact of GPR on foreign ownership decisions can be offset by improving enterprises’ green technology capability; and (3) in BRI countries with advanced green governance, the negative impact of GPR on the foreign ownership-level decisions of Chinese enterprises is mitigated, and the moderating effect of corporate green technology capability is magnified. This study offers vital insights for multinational enterprises (MNEs) formulating their foreign entry ownership strategies for green overseas investments based on enterprise characteristics and host country conditions to effectively mitigate the impacts of GPR. Similarly, it offers important implications for host countries on attracting more green investments by enhancing their green governance levels to counteract GPR.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxi Tang & Xiaojun Du, 2024. "Geopolitical Risk and Ownership Decision in Green Overseas Investment: Dual Moderation of Corporate Green Technology Capability and Host Green Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5452-:d:1423169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dario Caldara & Matteo Iacoviello, 2022. "Measuring Geopolitical Risk," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1194-1225, April.
    2. Rafael E. De Hoyos & Vasilis Sarafidis, 2006. "Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(4), pages 482-496, December.
    3. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    4. Ahmed, Zafar U. & Mohamad, Osman & Tan, Brian & Johnson, James P., 2002. "International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 805-813, October.
    5. Peter J. Buckley, 1995. "Foreign Direct Investment and Multinational Enterprises," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37851-3, March.
    6. Ilhan-Nas, Tulay & Okan, Tarhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Demirbag, Mehmet & Glaister, Keith W., 2018. "The effects of ownership concentration and institutional distance on the foreign entry ownership strategy of Turkish MNEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 173-183.
    7. Wei Hu & Yue Shan & Yun Deng & Ningning Fu & Jian Duan & Haining Jiang & Jianzhen Zhang, 2023. "Geopolitical Risk Evolution and Obstacle Factors of Countries along the Belt and Road and Its Types Classification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Nguyen, Trang Thi Thuy & Pham, Binh Thai & Sala, Hector, 2022. "Being an emerging economy: To what extent do geopolitical risks hamper technology and FDI inflows?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 728-746.
    9. Miaozhi Yu & Na Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Geopolitical Risk on International Direct Investment and Its Countermeasures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Desislava Dikova & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2007. "Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(6), pages 1013-1033, November.
    11. Yong Wang & Changyang Liu & Gaoyi Wang, 2020. "Geopolitical Risk Revealed in International Investment and World Trade," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 133-154, June.
    12. Jane Wenzhen Lu & Wen Li & Aiqi Wu & Xueli Huang, 2018. "Political hazards and entry modes of Chinese investments in Africa," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 39-61, March.
    13. Shen, Huayu & Liang, Yue & Li, Hanwen & Liu, Jie & Lu, Guangxi, 2021. "Does geopolitical risk promote mergers and acquisitions of listed companies in energy and electric power industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Zeeshan Ahmed & Shahid Rasool & Qasim Saleem & Mubashir Ali Khan & Shamsa Kanwal, 2022. "Mediating Role of Risk Perception Between Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Investment Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    15. Feng, Chaonan & Han, Liyan & Vigne, Samuel & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and the dynamics of international capital flows," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenxi Wan & Carlos M. P. Sousa & Jorge Lengler & Qun Tan, 2023. "Entry Mode Choice: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 193-246, April.
    2. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Fuhao, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and the sustainable utilization of natural resources: Evidence from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Loc Dong Truong & H. Swint Friday & Tan Duy Pham, 2024. "The Effects of Geopolitical Risk on Foreign Direct Investment in a Transition Economy: Evidence from Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Zhang, Zhikai & Wang, Yudong & Xiao, Jihong & Zhang, Yaojie, 2023. "Not all geopolitical shocks are alike: Identifying price dynamics in the crude oil market under tensions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Satar Bakhsh & Md Shabbir Alam & Wei Zhang, 2024. "Green finance and Sustainable Development Goals: is there a role for geopolitical uncertainty?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Nader Naifar & Shumokh Aljarba, 2023. "Does Geopolitical Risk Matter for Sovereign Credit Risk? Fresh Evidence from Nonlinear Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Jia, Shaoqing & Yang, Liuyong & Zhou, Fangzhao, 2022. "Geopolitical risk and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Qing Xie & Hua Yin, 2023. "Institutional Differences and the Choice of Outward Foreign Direct Investment Mode under the “Belt and Road” Initiative: Experience Analysis Based on China’s Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Wu, Haoran & Xu, Tongbin & Yang, Min, 2024. "Money never sleeps: Capital flows under global risk and uncertainty," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Banna, Hasanul & Alam, Ashraful & Chen, Xihui Haviour & Alam, Ahmed W., 2023. "Energy security and economic stability: The role of inflation and war," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Rao, Sandeep & Koirala, Santosh & Aldhawyan, Sulaiman & Corbet, Shaen, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and M&A: The role of national governance institutions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Rumokoy, Lawren J. & Omura, Akihiro & Roca, Eduardo, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and corporate investment in the metals and mining industry: Evidence from Australia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Trąpczyński, Piotr & Halaszovich, Tilo F. & Piaskowska, Dorota, 2020. "The role of perceived institutional distance in foreign ownership level decisions of new MNEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 435-449.
    14. Mukherjee Subhasree & Dhayanithy Deepak, 2017. "Effect of Inter-organizational Network on TMT – Entry Mode Choice relationship," Working papers 246, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    15. Zouhaier Dhifaoui & Kaies Ncibi & Faicel Gasmi & Abulmajeed Abdallah Alqarni, 2023. "The Nexus between Climate Change and Geopolitical Risk Index in Saudi Arabia Based on the Fourier-Domain Transfer Entropy Spectrum Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Faheem Aslam & Paulo Ferreira & Haider Ali & Ana Ercília José, 2022. "Application of Multifractal Analysis in Estimating the Reaction of Energy Markets to Geopolitical Acts and Threats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Li, Xin & Tong, Yan & Zhong, Kai & Xu, Guoquan & Zhao, Wenyi, 2024. "Geopolitical risk and foreign subsidiary performance of emerging market multinationals," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Ke Liu & Qiang Fu, 2024. "Does Geopolitical Risk Affect Agricultural Exports? Chinese Evidence from the Perspective of Agricultural Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Yang, Tianle & Dong, Qingyuan & Du, Min & Du, Qunyang, 2023. "Geopolitical risks, oil price shocks and inflation: Evidence from a TVP–SV–VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    20. Liu, Xi & Zhang, Xueyong, 2024. "Geopolitical risk and currency returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5452-:d:1423169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.