IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5343-d1420625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Spillover Effect of the Collaborative Agglomeration between Manufacturing and Producer Services

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxuan Li

    (School of Economics, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Ying Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

High-quality economic development is an inevitable requirement for promoting sustainable development. Stacks of research papers have suggested that the quality of China’s economic development will make an important contribution to promoting global sustainable development. The collaborative agglomeration between manufacturing and producer services is determined by multiple factors, including industrial characteristics and industrial associations. This is conducive to the efficient evolution of the industrial structure and to further achieving high-quality economic development. Based on the provincial data from 2010 to 2021 in China, this research evaluated the impact of co-agglomeration between manufacturing and producer services on high-quality economic development by using the double-fixed-effect spatial Durbin model. The benchmark regression results showed that industrial co-agglomeration impacted high-quality economic development in an inverted U-shaped. This result had a significant positive spatial spillover and was robust. In the spatial heterogeneity tests, the co-agglomeration of industries had different effects on high-quality development in regions. The strongest spillover effect of positive externalities was in the eastern region, which played an active role as a “growth pole”. The “siphon effect” happened in the central region. The spillover effect had a “U” shape in the western region, and the co-agglomeration inhibited current high-quality development. In the mechanism analysis, the industrial co-agglomeration enhanced high-quality development by stimulating green innovation, and the digital economy had a positive moderating effect. The study presented in this article provides empirical evidence and offers policy recommendations for formulating industrial policies and improving the quality of economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxuan Li & Ying Liu, 2024. "The Economic Spillover Effect of the Collaborative Agglomeration between Manufacturing and Producer Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5343-:d:1420625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellison, Glenn & Glaeser, Edward L, 1997. "Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(5), pages 889-927, October.
    2. C. Cindy Fan & Allen J. Scott, 2003. "Industrial Agglomeration and Development: A Survey of Spatial Economic Issues in East Asia and a Statistical Analysis of Chinese Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(3), pages 295-319, July.
    3. Timothy F. Bresnahan & Erik Brynjolfsson & Lorin M. Hitt, 2002. "Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 339-376.
    4. Guido De Blasio & Sabrina Di Addario, 2005. "Do Workers Benefit from Industrial Agglomeration?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 797-827, November.
    5. Emma Howard & Carol Newman & Finn Tarp, 2016. "Measuring industry coagglomeration and identifying the driving forces," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 1055-1078.
    6. Yixiao Zhou, 2018. "Human capital, institutional quality and industrial upgrading: global insights from industrial data," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Haochang Yang & Faming Zhang & Yixin He, 2021. "Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16119-16144, November.
    8. Wei Zhang & Jing Cheng & Xuemeng Liu & Zhangrong Zhu, 2023. "Heterogeneous industrial agglomeration, its coordinated development and total factor energy efficiency," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5511-5537, June.
    9. Chen, Danling & Hu, Wenbo & Li, Yuying & Zhang, Chaozheng & Lu, Xinhai & Cheng, Hui, 2023. "Exploring the temporal and spatial effects of city size on regional economic integration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Carlsson, Bo, 2004. "The Digital Economy: what is new and what is not?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 245-264, September.
    11. Ping Lu & Jianhui Liu & Yunxuan Wang & Lei Ruan, 2021. "Can industrial agglomeration improve regional green total factor productivity in China? An empirical analysis based on spatial econometrics," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1011-1039, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Miao & Wu, Yi & Zhang, Xinmin & Lei, Lei, 2024. "How does industrial agglomeration affect internal structures of green economy in China? An analysis based on a three-hierarchy meta-frontier DEA and systematic GMM approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Jordi Jofre-Monseny & Raquel Marín-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2012. "What underlies localization and urbanization economies? Evidence from the location of new firms," Working Papers 2012/9, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    3. İ. Akçomak & Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2011. "Measuring and Interpreting Trends in the Division of Labour in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 435-482, December.
    4. Cassandra C Wang & George C S Lin & Guicai Li, 2010. "Industrial Clustering and Technological Innovation in China: New Evidence from the ICT Industry in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(8), pages 1987-2010, August.
    5. Inhye Yoo & Chan-Goo Yi, 2022. "Economic Innovation Caused by Digital Transformation and Impact on Social Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Kevin P. Heanue, 2008. "Measuring Industrial Agglomeration in a Rural Industry: The Case of Irish Furniture Manufacturing," Working Papers 0830, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    7. Renjith Ramachandran & Ketan Reddy & Subash Sasidharan, 2020. "Agglomeration and Productivity: Evidence from Indian Manufactuaring," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 8(1), pages 75-94, June.
    8. Chris Forman & Avi Goldfarb, 2021. "Concentration and Agglomeration of IT Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Patenting," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 95-121, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Yingli Huang & Guoyi Lou & Yue Ren, 2024. "Can Industrial Spatial Configuration Catalyze the Transition and Advancement of Resource-Dependent Regions? An Empirical Analysis from Heilongjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    10. K.J Joseph & Vinoj Abraham, 2007. "Information technology and productivity: Evidence from India's manufacturing sector," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 389, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
    11. Diodato, Dario & Neffke, Frank & O’Clery, Neave, 2018. "Why do industries coagglomerate? How Marshallian externalities differ by industry and have evolved over time," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-26.
    12. Yang, Chih-Hai & Lin, Hui-Lin & Li, Hsiao-Yun, 2013. "Influences of production and R&D agglomeration on productivity: Evidence from Chinese electronics firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 162-178.
    13. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Lucia Piscitello & Cristina Rossi, 2007. "Explaining the Territorial Adoption of New Technologies: A Spatial Econometric Approach," Chapters, in: Koen Frenken (ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Rawaa Laajimi & Julie Le Gallo & Saloua Benammou, 2020. "What Geographical Concentration of Industries in the Tunisian Sahel? Empirical Evidence Using Distance‐Based Measures," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(5), pages 738-757, December.
    15. Xin Liu & Pingping Luo & Madhab Rijal & Maochuan Hu & Khai Lin Chong, 2024. "Spatial Spillover Effects of Urban Agglomeration on Road Network with Industrial Co-Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Ziyan Zheng & Yingming Zhu & Yu Pei & Litao Wang, 2023. "Spatial–temporal heterogeneity and influencing factors of the coupling between industrial agglomeration and regional economic resilience in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12735-12759, November.
    17. Kandogan, Yener, 2014. "The effect of foreign trade and investment liberalization on spatial concentration of economic activity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 648-659.
    18. Stefanie Haller & Iulia Siedschlag, 2011. "Determinants of ICT adoption: evidence from firm-level data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(26), pages 3775-3788.
    19. John Rand & Finn Tarp & Neda Trifković & Helge Zille, 2019. "Industrial agglomeration in Myanmar," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-3, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Nina Czernich, 2011. "The emergence of broadband internet and consequences for economic and social development," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5343-:d:1420625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.