IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4896-d1410895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Smell of Sustainability: Understanding Consumers’ Acceptability of Recycled Plastic Packaging with an Off-Odor

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Di Cicco

    (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Maike Loos

    (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Isa Vos

    (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Rebecca Gibson

    (Packaging Development, Unilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Birkenhead CH63 3JW, UK)

  • Yuvesveri Naidoo

    (Packaging Development, Unilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Birkenhead CH63 3JW, UK)

  • Susan Gifford

    (Consumer Science, Unilever Research & Development, Port Sunlight, Birkenhead CH63 3JW, UK)

  • Monique A. M. Smeets

    (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Beauty & Personal Care Science & Technology, Consumer Science, Unilever Research & Development, 3013 AL Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This study investigates consumers’ acceptance and perceptions of post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic packaging with an off-odor, and the effect of a sustainability claim thereupon. We utilized a mixed design to examine the influence of the percentage of PCR, packaging color, and the presence of a sustainability claim on consumer perceptions. Participants were presented with vignettes describing a scenario involving the purchase of shampoo bottles with or without a sustainability claim and asked to smell and rate the odor qualities of the bottles, as well as their acceptability and willingness to buy. The study found a main effect of the percentage of PCR and color on acceptability and willingness to buy and a main effect of the percentage of PCR on the perceived odor properties. However, the presence of a sustainability claim did not significantly affect consumer perceptions. The findings provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the sustainable production and consumption sector and offer recommendations for future research to further explore the impact of sustainability claims in shaping consumer acceptance of sustainable packaging with suboptimal sensory properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Di Cicco & Maike Loos & Isa Vos & Rebecca Gibson & Yuvesveri Naidoo & Susan Gifford & Monique A. M. Smeets, 2024. "The Smell of Sustainability: Understanding Consumers’ Acceptability of Recycled Plastic Packaging with an Off-Odor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4896-:d:1410895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4896/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4896/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nayeon Kim & Kyungtag Lee, 2023. "Environmental Consciousness, Purchase Intention, and Actual Purchase Behavior of Eco-Friendly Products: The Moderating Impact of Situational Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Charles Spence & Carlos Velasco, 2019. "Packaging Colour and Its Multiple Roles," Springer Books, in: Carlos Velasco & Charles Spence (ed.), Multisensory Packaging, chapter 2, pages 21-48, Springer.
    3. Dimitris Georgantzis Garcia & Eva Kipnis & Efi Vasileiou & Adrian Solomon, 2021. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: Learning from Our Mistakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Kilbourne, William & Pickett, Gregory, 2008. "How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(9), pages 885-893, September.
    5. Maria V. Zwicker & Cameron Brick & Gert-Jan M. Gruter & Frenk van Harreveld, 2021. "(Not) Doing the Right Things for the Wrong Reasons: An Investigation of Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions, and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Based Plastics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Micaela Pinho & Sofia Gomes, 2023. "What Role Does Sustainable Behavior and Environmental Awareness from Civil Society Play in the Planet’s Sustainable Transition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Raouf Ahmad Rather & Shehnaz Tehseen & Murtaza Hassan Itoo & Shakir Hussain Parrey, 2019. "Customer brand identification, affective commitment, customer satisfaction, and brand trust as antecedents of customer behavioral intention of loyalty: An empirical study in the hospitality sector," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 196-217, April.
    8. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170610645439 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Francesco Testa & Roberta Iovino & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "The circular economy and consumer behaviour: The mediating role of information seeking in buying circular packaging," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3435-3448, December.
    10. Michael Siegrist, 2000. "The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Tiago Trancoso, 2023. "The Dark Side of Green Marketing: How Greenwashing Affects Circular Consumption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    3. Fraccascia, Luca & Ceccarelli, Gaia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2023. "Green products from industrial symbiosis: Are consumers ready for them?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Consumers’ Perspectives on Circular Economy: Main Tendencies for Market Valorization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Fabio Nonino & Alessandro Pompei, 2021. "Which are the determinants of green purchase behaviour? A study of Italian consumers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2600-2620, July.
    6. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    7. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Sustaining Change: Unravelling the Socio-cultural Threads of Sustainable Consumption," MPRA Paper 117981, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2023.
    8. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    9. Nicolás Bronfman & Pamela Cisternas & Esperanza López-Vázquez & Luis Cifuentes, 2016. "Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 307-327, March.
    10. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    11. Chunhao Wei & Han Chen & Yee Ming Lee, 2022. "COVID-19 preventive measures and restaurant customers’ intention to dine out: the role of brand trust and perceived risk," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 581-600, September.
    12. Sangsomboon Ploywarin & Yan Song & Dian Sun, 2018. "Research on Factors Affecting Public Risk Perception of Thai High-Speed Railway Projects Based on “Belt and Road Initiative”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Li Li & John Robert Bautista, 2019. "Examining Personal and Media Factors Associated with Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods among University Students in Kunming, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Samia Ayyub & Xuhui Wang & Muhammad Asif & Rana Muhammad Ayyub, 2018. "Antecedents of Trust in Organic Foods: The Mediating Role of Food Related Personality Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    16. Timothy C. Earle, 2004. "Thinking Aloud about Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 169-183, February.
    17. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Tamara Vlastelica & Milica Kostić-Stanković & Tamara Rajić & Jelena Krstić & Tijana Obradović, 2023. "Determinants of Young Adult Consumers’ Environmentally and Socially Responsible Apparel Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Fung, Timothy K.F. & Choi, Doo Hun & Scheufele, Dietram A. & Shaw, Bret R., 2014. "Public opinion about biofuels: The interplay between party identification and risk/benefit perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 344-355.
    20. Yawson, Robert M. & Kuzma, Jennifer, 2010. "Evidence review and experts’ opinion on consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology," MPRA Paper 40807, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4896-:d:1410895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.