IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4793-d1408761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biodiversity Characteristics and Carbon Sequestration Potential of Successional Woody Plants versus Tree Plantation under Different Reclamation Treatments on Hard-Coal Mine Heaps––A Case Study from Upper Silesia

Author

Listed:
  • Bartłomiej Woś

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Amisalu Milkias Misebo

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Wojciech Ochał

    (Department of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Anna Klamerus-Iwan

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Marek Pająk

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Edyta Sierka

    (Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Kompała-Bąba

    (Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland)

  • Michał Bujok

    (Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland)

  • Wojciech Bierza

    (Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Józefowska

    (Department of Soil Science and Agrophysics, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Julita Bujak

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Marcin Pietrzykowski

    (Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 30-120 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

In the discussion about sustainable forestry, a key role is played by the development of ecosystem services, including ecological, social, and economic ones, in which biodiversity and carbon (C) sequestration are among the most important. Afforestation of disturbed and post-mining sites is one of the ways to minimize the negative impact of civilization on the environment. Optimizing C sequestration strategies at post-mining sites plays a crucial role in promoting ecosystem recovery, supporting climate change mitigation, and enabling C offsetting. In this study, we compared the C storage in the soil and plant biomass of forest ecosystems developed on coal-mine heaps for different scenarios of reclamation and succession. We tested combinations of sites (i.e., non-reclaimed sites on bare carboniferous rock [BR] and sites reclaimed by applying topsoil [TS]) and successional woodland and tree plantation. The estimated potential for total C storage (in the soil + biomass) for TS sites ranged from 68.13 to 121.08 Mg ha −1 , of which 52.20–102.89 Mg ha −1 was stored in the soil and 12.09–20.15 Mg ha −1 in the biomass. In the non-reclaimed sites on BR, the total C storage was much higher, amounting to 523.14 Mg ha −1 (507.66 Mg ha −1 being in the soil), which was due to the geogenic coal content in the BR. However, the C storage in the biomass (15.48 Mg ha −1 ) and litter (5.91 Mg ha −1 ) was similar to the amounts obtained from the reclaimed sites. The number of species did not differ statistically significantly between the analyzed variants. On average, 14 species were recorded in the plots. The average Shannon–Wiener index (H’) value was higher for sites with BR (1.99) than TS variants on reclaimed plots (1.71). The lowest H’ value was for those plots with Robinia pseudacacia in the stand. One of the main implications of the obtained results for sustainable forestry is the perspective of using succession in the recovery of a disturbed ecosystem. We noted that woodlands from succession on BR are highly biodiverse, have high C sequestration potential, and do not require time-consuming reclamation treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartłomiej Woś & Amisalu Milkias Misebo & Wojciech Ochał & Anna Klamerus-Iwan & Marek Pająk & Edyta Sierka & Agnieszka Kompała-Bąba & Michał Bujok & Wojciech Bierza & Agnieszka Józefowska & Julita Buj, 2024. "Biodiversity Characteristics and Carbon Sequestration Potential of Successional Woody Plants versus Tree Plantation under Different Reclamation Treatments on Hard-Coal Mine Heaps––A Case Study from Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4793-:d:1408761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James B. Grace & T. Michael Anderson & Eric W. Seabloom & Elizabeth T. Borer & Peter B. Adler & W. Stanley Harpole & Yann Hautier & Helmut Hillebrand & Eric M. Lind & Meelis Pärtel & Jonathan D. Bakke, 2016. "Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7586), pages 390-393, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kangwei Jiang & Qingqing Zhang & Yafei Wang & Hong Li & Yongqiang Yang & Tursunnay Reyimu, 2023. "The Combination of Plant Diversity and Soil Microbial Diversity Directly and Actively Drives the Multifunctionality of Grassland Ecosystems in the Middle Part of the Northern Slopes of the Tian Shan u," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Chen, Si & Shahi, Chander & Chen, Han Y.H. & Kumar, Praveen & Ma, Zilong & McLaren, Brian, 2018. "Trade-offs and Synergies Between Economic Gains and Plant Diversity Across a Range of Management Alternatives in Boreal Forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 162-172.
    3. Jakob Runge, 2023. "Modern causal inference approaches to investigate biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, December.
    4. Liting Zheng & Kathryn E. Barry & Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez & Dylan Craven & Peter B. Reich & Kris Verheyen & Michael Scherer-Lorenzen & Nico Eisenhauer & Nadia Barsoum & Jürgen Bauhus & Helge Bruel, 2024. "Effects of plant diversity on productivity strengthen over time due to trait-dependent shifts in species overyielding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Leilei Yang & Junhui Zhang & Jiahui Wang & Shijie Han & Zhongling Guo & Chunnan Fan & Jinghua Yu, 2024. "Relationships between Tree Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass Are Mediated by Site-Dependent Factors in Northeastern China Natural Reserves on a Small Spatial Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Minna Zhang & Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo & Guangyin Li & Forest Isbell & Yue Wang & Yann Hautier & Yao Wang & Yingli Xiao & Jinting Cai & Xiaobin Pan & Ling Wang, 2023. "Experimental impacts of grazing on grassland biodiversity and function are explained by aridity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Lijin Zhang & Hu Du & Zhiqi Yang & Tongqing Song & Fuping Zeng & Wanxia Peng & Guoqin Huang, 2022. "Topography and Soil Properties Determine Biomass and Productivity Indirectly via Community Structural and Species Diversity in Karst Forest, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Karolina Ryś & Damian Chmura & Dariusz Prostański & Gabriela Woźniak, 2023. "Biomass Amounts of Spontaneous Vegetation on Post-Coal Mine Novel Ecosystem in Relation to Biotic Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.
    9. Marie Spohn & Sumanta Bagchi & Lori A. Biederman & Elizabeth T. Borer & Kari Anne Bråthen & Miguel N. Bugalho & Maria C. Caldeira & Jane A. Catford & Scott L. Collins & Nico Eisenhauer & Nicole Hagena, 2023. "The positive effect of plant diversity on soil carbon depends on climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Minglu Hu & Xinghao Lu & Yuncai Wang, 2024. "The Effects of Spatial Structure and Development Intensity of the Urban Landscape on Bird Biodiversity in Anhui Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Laura E. Dee & Paul J. Ferraro & Christopher N. Severen & Kaitlin A. Kimmel & Elizabeth T. Borer & Jarrett E. K. Byrnes & Adam Thomas Clark & Yann Hautier & Andrew Hector & Xavier Raynaud & Peter B. R, 2023. "Clarifying the effect of biodiversity on productivity in natural ecosystems with longitudinal data and methods for causal inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Gintarė Šidlauskaitė & Vilma Kemešytė & Monika Toleikienė & Žydrė Kadžiulienė, 2022. "Plant Diversity, Functional Group Composition and Legumes Effects versus Fertilisation on the Yield and Forage Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Ang Hu & Mira Choi & Andrew J. Tanentzap & Jinfu Liu & Kyoung-Soon Jang & Jay T. Lennon & Yongqin Liu & Janne Soininen & Xiancai Lu & Yunlin Zhang & Ji Shen & Jianjun Wang, 2022. "Ecological networks of dissolved organic matter and microorganisms under global change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Chiarella, Cristina & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Conforti, Piero, 2023. "Balancing the trade-offs between land productivity, labor productivity and labor intensity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(10), pages 1618-1634.
    15. Jiaorong Qian & Mao Ye & Xi Zhang & Miaomiao Li & Weilong Chen & Guoyan Zeng & Jing Che & Yexin Lv, 2024. "Characteristics of Grassland Species Diversity and Soil Physicochemical Properties with Elevation Gradient in Burzin Forest Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4793-:d:1408761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.