IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4647-d1405491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Educational Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Suitability, Spatial Pattern, and Obstacle Factor

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Meng

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Fengjuan Yan

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Qi Fang

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Wentao Si

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Combining the Intangible Cultural Heritage and sustainable development has been an important effort of UNESCO since the new century. This study discusses the suitability of educational tourism development of intangible cultural heritage. On the one hand, it was beneficial to improve the comprehensive quality of students; on the other hand, it was conducive to protecting and rationally developing the cultural heritage and avoiding its loss. In this study, an evaluation index system was established according to the analytic hierarchy process, which included two aspects (i.e., intrinsic value and extrinsic conditions) and 16 indices from four criterion layers (e.g., educational value, recreational value, environmental conditions, and relevant facilities and services). Furthermore, we calculated the development suitability and spatial distribution patterns of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism. At the same time, using the obstacle degree model, the obstacle degrees of each indicator factor were screened and identified to explore the source of obstacles that restrict the suitability of educational tourism development of ICH. Results showed that: (1) The development suitability of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism was divided into high suitability, middle suitability, and low suitability. A total of 186 intangible cultural heritages were found in Shandong Province, China. Among these intangible cultural heritages, 60 of 186 (32.26%) were low suitability, with values ranging from 0.326 to 0.460; 86 of 186 (46.24%) were middle suitability, with values of 0.460–0.543, and 40 of 186 (21.50%) were high suitability with a range of 0.543–0.689. (2) The spatial distribution patterns of suitability showed that the development suitability of intangible cultural heritage for educational tourism in Shandong Province exhibited a significantly positive spatial correlation that projects with similar suitability levels were clustered into a group and generally distributed with a direction of “southwest to the northeast”. (3) According to the diagnostic results of obstacle factor analysis, from the perspective of the first level indicator, the obstacle degree of the intrinsic value (A1) of the three levels of suitability of ICH was the highest. Among the second-level indicators, educational value (B1) has always been the biggest obstacle factor affecting the educational tourism of ICH, and the relevance of cultural content (C2), representativeness and typicality of the phenomenon (C3), applicability of teaching cases (C4), and uniqueness or rarity (C5) were the greatest among the three suitability factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Meng & Fengjuan Yan & Qi Fang & Wentao Si, 2024. "Research on the Educational Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Suitability, Spatial Pattern, and Obstacle Factor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4647-:d:1405491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenyan Pan & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Yuanyuan Wang & Benhong Peng & Guo Wei & Ehsan Elahi, 2019. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Spatial Difference Analysis of Regional Ecological Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Todd, Louise & Leask, Anna & Ensor, John, 2017. "Understanding primary stakeholders' multiple roles in hallmark event tourism management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 494-509.
    4. Jiacan Wang & Mo Chen & Hongyan Zhang & Fang Ye, 2023. "Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yangtze River Basin: Its Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Zhaoyu Chen, 2022. "Visualizing experiencescape – from the art of intangible cultural heritage," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 559-578, February.
    6. Teng-Fei Ma & Chang-Wei Chai & Tseng-Wei Chao, 2022. "On the Study of the Sustainable Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples’ Diets—Take the Protection of Geographical Indications as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Jinrong Hu & Yuyuan Zhang & Le Wang & Victor Shi, 2022. "An Evaluation Index System of Basic Elderly Care Services Based on the Perspective of Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Weiying Cai & Hui Di & Xingpeng Liu, 2019. "Estimation of the Spatial Suitability of Winter Tourism Destinations Based on Copula Functions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Dieu Hack-Polay & Mahfuzur Rahman & Matthijs Bal, 2023. "Beyond Cultural Instrumentality: Exploring the Concept of Total Diaspora Cultural Capital for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxi (Bella) Bai & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Jose Weng Chou Wong, 2023. "Memorable Tourism Experience Research: A Systematic Citation Review (2009–2021)," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Zhiqiang Cai & Keke Cai & Tao Huang & Ge Zhang & Ruixi Chen, 2024. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Sustainable Inheritance Strategies of National Traditional Fine Arts Intangible Cultural Heritage in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Petya Ivanova, 2021. "Event Tourism Development in Bulgaria: Key Factors and Main Goals," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 168-191.
    5. Jordi Pons-Novell & Montserrat Guillen, 2022. "The Autonomous Capacity of the Elderly Population in Spain for Shopping and Preparing Meals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Hong Zhu & Feng Cheng & Jinliang Wang & Yuanmei Jiao & Jingchun Zhou & Jinming Sha & Fang Liu & Lanping Nong, 2023. "Variation in the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Its Driving Factors of the Five Lake Basins in Central Yunnan Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Hossein Karami & Romina Sayahnia & Hossein Mahmoudi & Hossein Azadi & Sadegh Salehi, 2023. "Spatial analysis of resources and environmental carrying capacity in Iran," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(1), pages 60-86, February.
    8. Benhong Peng & Weimin Yan & Guo Wei & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Evolution and interaction of ecological civilization construction pattern from the perspective of path dependence–based on the panel data of Jiangsu Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 12226-12247, October.
    9. Mingjun Xu & Changling Chen & Shugao Lin & Duanshuai Shen, 2023. "Research on the Spatial-Temporal Variation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity and the Impact of Supply-Side Reform on Them: Evidence from Provincial-Level Data in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Chensi Guo & Wenyan Pan, 2022. "Research on Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure Mechanism of Enterprises from the Perspective of Stakeholders—A Case Study on the Automobile Manufacturing Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Weiying Cai & Jie Yu & Wei Yang, 2023. "The Spatial Synergy of the Ice–Snow Tourism Industry and Its Related Industries in Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Xueru Yang & Haoming Li & Wenhong (Miranda) Chen & Hui Fu, 2019. "Corporate Community Involvement and Chinese Rural Tourist Destination Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Shuyun Li & Mingxue Wei & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Shaozhi Chen, 2023. "The Sustainable Impact of Import on Chinese Residents’ Happiness: Evidence from CGSS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Mo Hu & Zhiyuan Hao & Yinrui Yin, 2022. "Promoting the Integration of Elderly Healthcare and Elderly Nursing: Evidence from the Chinese Government," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Li Cui & Min Zhang & Kuo-Jui Wu & Ming-Lang Tseng, 2018. "Constructing a Hierarchical Agribusiness Framework in Chinese Belt and Road Initiatives under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Xiaolong Gao & Changfei Li & Ehsan Elahi & Mohammad Ilyas Abro & Zhaocai Cui, 2023. "Technological Innovation, Product Quality and Upgrading of Manufacturing Value Chain: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Spasojevic, Bojana & Lohmann, Gui & Scott, Noel, 2019. "Leadership and governance in air route development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Perna Fernando & Custódio Maria João & Oliveira Vanessa, 2019. "Local Communities and Sport Activities Expenditures and Image: Residents’ Role in Sustainable Tourism and Recreation," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 49-59, May.
    19. Mo Chen & Jiacan Wang & Jing Sun & Fang Ye & Hongyan Zhang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Tourism Response in the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Cheng Zhan & Mingjing Guo & Jinhua Cheng & Hongxia Peng, 2022. "Evaluation of Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Support Pressure Coupling Mechanism: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4647-:d:1405491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.