IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5463-d391434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyan Pan

    (School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Muhammad Awais Gulzar

    (University of Waikato Joint Institute, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China
    Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand)

  • Waseem Hassan

    (NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

The “driver–pressure–state–impact–response” (DPSIR) model has recently become a popular approach to deal with environmental problems. The combination of DPSIR with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a useful method to study low-carbon evaluation because the AHP model has a special advantage in multi-indexes evaluation. This paper constructs the low-carbon economy evaluation system and comprehensively evaluates the numerical value of low-carbon economic development of China’s 30 regions from 2000 to 2015 by using the AHP method. It shows that the numerical value of low-carbon economy of China’s 30 regions varies in terms of growth rate. The numerical value of east regional low-carbon economy shows a pattern that is gradually higher than that of the west region. The numerical value of low carbon economic development in the south region is higher than that of the north region by degrees. In addition, based on the model of coordination degree in 2015, the result indicated that the four subsystems have primary coordination in the east area and bare coordination in the central and west areas. It is indicated that the four sub-indexes should be developed at the same pace and promoting the development of a low-carbon economy in the mid-west areas is the key in China. Finally, we proposed that environmental regulations and policies should be formulated to improve coordination in various aspects and various departments. Calculating the degree of low-carbon economic coupling coordination may be helpful for policy makers to formulate effective policies and take actions in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyan Pan & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5463-:d:391434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying, Xiong & Zeng, Guang-Ming & Chen, Gui-Qiu & Tang, Lin & Wang, Ke-Lin & Huang, Dao-You, 2007. "Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case study of Hunan Province, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 97-109.
    2. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    3. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 788-798, March.
    4. Böhringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2013. "Transition towards a low carbon economy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 16-26.
    5. Andrew, Robbie & Forgie, Vicky, 2008. "A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 194-204, December.
    6. Krajnc, Damjan & Glavič, Peter, 2005. "A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 189-208.
    7. Chen, G.Q. & Zhang, Bo, 2010. "Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: Inventory and input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6180-6193, October.
    8. Michalena, Evanthie & Kouloumpis, Viktor & Hills, Jeremy M., 2018. "Challenges for Pacific Small Island Developing States in achieving their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 508-518.
    9. Qu, Shijin & Hu, Shougeng & Li, Weidong & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Chuanrong & Li, Quanfeng, 2020. "Interaction between urban land expansion and land use policy: An analysis using the DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    11. Li, Zhong-Wu & Zeng, Guang-Ming & Zhang, Hua & Yang, Bin & Jiao, Sheng, 2007. "The integrated eco-environment assessment of the red soil hilly region based on GIS—A case study in Changsha City, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 540-546.
    12. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, April.
    13. Daniels, Peter L., 2010. "Climate change, economics and Buddhism -- Part I: An integrated environmental analysis framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 952-961, March.
    14. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2009. "Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 778-787, March.
    15. Hughes, Nick & Strachan, Neil, 2010. "Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6056-6065, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chensi Guo & Wenyan Pan, 2022. "Research on Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure Mechanism of Enterprises from the Perspective of Stakeholders—A Case Study on the Automobile Manufacturing Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Lin Meng & Fengjuan Yan & Qi Fang & Wentao Si, 2024. "Research on the Educational Tourism Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Suitability, Spatial Pattern, and Obstacle Factor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-28, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karaca, Ferhat & Raven, Paul Graham & Machell, John & Camci, Fatih, 2015. "A comparative analysis framework for assessing the sustainability of a combined water and energy infrastructure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 456-468.
    2. Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2015. "Including management and security of supply constraints for designing stand-alone electrification systems in developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 359-369.
    3. Koo, Jamin & Park, Kyungtae & Shin, Dongil & Yoon, En Sup, 2011. "Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2254-2260, June.
    4. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    5. Guifang Yang & Zhenghong Chen, 2015. "RS-based fuzzy multiattribute assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in the source area of the Lishui River of northwest Hunan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 1145-1161, September.
    6. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    7. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    8. Tsita, Katerina G. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2012. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for the Greek road transport sector using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 677-686.
    9. Li, Lu & Shi, Zhi-Hua & Yin, Wei & Zhu, Dun & Ng, Sai Leung & Cai, Chong-Fa & Lei, A-Lin, 2009. "A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the danjiangkou reservoir area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3439-3447.
    10. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    12. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.
    13. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    14. Shen, Yung-Chi & Chou, Chiyang James & Lin, Grace T.R., 2011. "The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2589-2598.
    15. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    16. Sani Habibu & Aliyu Bilkisu Adamu & Nuhu Siddique R., 2021. "Assessing Renewable Energy Practice in Turaki Ali House Kaduna-Nigeria," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 85-96, December.
    17. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin, 2016. "An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 435-448.
    18. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    19. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Giannoulis, E.D. & Haralambopoulos, D.A., 2011. "Distributed Generation in an isolated grid: Methodology of case study for Lesvos - Greece," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2530-2540, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5463-:d:391434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.