IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4563-d1403417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Traits of Leading Sustainable Firms in the Semiconductor Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Young Yoo

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

  • Keuntae Cho

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
    Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Few studies have investigated sustainable management in the semiconductor industry. Consequently, this study analyzed the characteristics of companies excelling in sustainable management in the semiconductor industry using chief executive officer messages. It compared high- and low-performing groups to identify leading sustainable firms. Centrality analysis was conducted to extract keywords, which were mapped to the sustainability criteria to conduct network analysis. The results showed that the high-performing group emphasized sustainable development across the semiconductor industry ecosystem, while the low-performing group focused on internal sustainability aspects. This underscores the need for effective sustainable development in the semiconductor industry that extends beyond individual company efforts and embraces industry solidarity. Thus, this study presents a methodology that can be applied to similar studies in industries beyond semiconductors.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Yoo & Keuntae Cho, 2024. "Key Traits of Leading Sustainable Firms in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4563-:d:1403417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne Arvidsson, 2023. "CEO talk of sustainability in CEO letters: towards the inclusion of a sustainability embeddedness and value-creation perspective," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(7), pages 26-61, January.
    2. Yongkyu Choi & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Analysis of Environmental Management Characteristics Using Network Analysis of CEO Communication in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Josef Baumüller & Karina Sopp, 2021. "Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 8-28, December.
    4. Bui, Tat-Dat, 2024. "Assessing sustainable supply chain transparency practices in Taiwan semiconductor industry: A hierarchical interdependence approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-04-2021-0114 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Arménio Rego & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Daniel Polónia, 2017. "Corporate Sustainability: A View From the Top," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 133-157, June.
    7. Hannele Mäkelä & Matias Laine, 2011. "A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 217-231, December.
    8. Frank Wiengarten & Chris K. Y. Lo & Jessie Y. K. Lam, 2017. "“How does Sustainability Leadership Affect Firm Performance? The Choices Associated with Appointing a Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 477-493, February.
    9. Yun Gil Choi & Keun Tae Cho, 2020. "Analysis of Safety Management Characteristics Using Network Analysis of CEO Messages in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Mäkelä, Hannele & Laine, Matias, 2011. "A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 217-231.
    11. Stefan A. Seuring & Julia Koplin & Torsten Behrens & Uwe Schneidewind, 2003. "Sustainability assessment in the German detergent industry: from stakeholder involvement to sustainability indicators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 199-212.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongkyu Choi & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Analysis of Environmental Management Characteristics Using Network Analysis of CEO Communication in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Bishara, Norman & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2020. "Managerial career concerns and the content of corporate disclosures: An analysis of the tone of earnings press releases," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    4. George Ferns & Kenneth Amaeshi & Aliette Lambert, 2019. "Drilling their Own Graves: How the European Oil and Gas Supermajors Avoid Sustainability Tensions Through Mythmaking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 201-231, August.
    5. Russell J. Craig & Niamh M. Brennan, 2012. "An exploration of the relationship between language choice in CEO letters to shareholders and corporate reputation," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 166-177, September.
    6. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    7. Saverio Bozzolan & Giovanna Michelon & Marco Mattei & Andrea Giornetti, 2019. "Signing the letter to shareholders: Does the Signatory?s role relate to impression management?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 37-82.
    8. Mohammed Hossain & Md. Tarikul Islam & Mahmood Ahmed Momin & Shamsun Nahar & Md. Samsul Alam, 2019. "Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 563-586, December.
    9. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus & Lehman, Glen, 2012. "Analyzing the quality, meaning and accountability of organizational reporting and communication: Directions for future research," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 223-230.
    10. Martínez-Martínez, Domingo & Rodríguez Castro, Paula Isabel & Andrades Peña, Francisco Javier & Sierra Blanco, Jesús, 2024. "The Sustainable Development Goals and Large Spanish Companies: An analysis of their commitment based on their Non-Financial Reporting," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    11. M. Dolores Guerrero‐Baena & Francisca Castilla‐Polo & Pablo Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, 2024. "Motivations for social and environmental reporting in Spanish SMEs: An inductive content analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4130-4144, July.
    12. Anne‐Kathrin Weber, 2020. "Corporate Role Conceptions in Global Forest Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(5), pages 611-627, November.
    13. Laura Bini & Marco Bellucci & Francesco Giunta, 2016. "Put Your Money where Your Mouth is: The Difference between Real Commitment to Sustainability and Mere Rhetoric," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-31.
    14. Ralf Barkemeyer & Breeda Comyns & Frank Figge & Giulio Napolitano, 2014. "CEO statements in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 241-257, December.
    15. Mäkelä, Hannele, 2013. "On the ideological role of employee reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 360-378.
    16. Hyung Jong Na & Kun Chang Lee & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim, 2020. "Exploring CEO Messages in Sustainability Management Reports: Applying Sentiment Mining and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Martins, Adelaide & Gomes, Delfina & Oliveira, Lídia & Caria, Ana & Parker, Lee, 2020. "Resistance strategies through the CEO communications in the media," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Yunseok Hong & Keuntae Cho, 2024. "Differences in CEO Communication Strategies between High- and Low-Performing Firms in the Global Auto Parts Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Hyung Jong Na & So Ra Kim & Hyun Jin Jo, 2022. "Integrating Text-Mining and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Methods to Examine the Relationship between CEO Messages of Homepages and Firm Value: Emphasis on Fashion Companies in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Sorola, Matthew, 2022. "Q methodology to conduct a critical study in accounting: A Q study on accountants’ perspectives of social and environmental reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4563-:d:1403417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.