IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4324-d1398513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pots to Plots: Microshock Weed Control Is an Effective and Energy Efficient Option in the Field

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J. Bloomer

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Kerry C. Harrington

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Hossein Ghanizadeh

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Trevor K. James

    (Ethical Agriculture, AgResearch Limited, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand)

Abstract

Seeking low environmental impact alternatives to chemical herbicides that can be integrated into a regenerative agriculture system, we developed and tested flat-plate electrode weeding equipment applying ultra-low-energy electric shocks to seedlings in the field. Better than 90% control was achieved for all species, with energy to treat 5 weeds m −2 equivalent to 15 kJ ha −1 for L. didymum and A. powellii , and 363 kJ ha −1 (leaf contact only) and 555kJ ha −1 (plants pressed to soil) for in-ground L. multiflorum , all well below our 1 MJ ha −1 target and a fraction of the energy required by any other weeding system. We compared applications to the leaves only or to leaves pressed against the soil surface, to seedlings growing outside in the ground and to plants growing in bags filled with the same soil. No previous studies have made such direct comparisons. Our research indicated that greenhouse and in-field results are comparable, other factors remaining constant. The in-ground, outdoor treatments were as effective and efficient as our previously published in-bag, greenhouse trials. The flat-plate system tested supports sustainable farming by providing ultra-low-energy weed control suitable for manual, robotic, or conventional deployment without recourse to tillage or chemical herbicides.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J. Bloomer & Kerry C. Harrington & Hossein Ghanizadeh & Trevor K. James, 2024. "Pots to Plots: Microshock Weed Control Is an Effective and Energy Efficient Option in the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4324-:d:1398513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom O’Donoghue & Budiman Minasny & Alex McBratney, 2022. "Regenerative Agriculture and Its Potential to Improve Farmscape Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Io Carydi & Athanasios Koutsianas & Marios Desyllas, 2023. "People, Crops, and Bee Farming: Landscape Models for a Symbiotic Network in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Kelly R. Wilson & Robert L. Myers & Mary K. Hendrickson & Emily A. Heaton, 2022. "Different Stakeholders’ Conceptualizations and Perspectives of Regenerative Agriculture Reveals More Consensus Than Discord," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Małgorzata Holka & Jolanta Kowalska & Magdalena Jakubowska, 2022. "Reducing Carbon Footprint of Agriculture—Can Organic Farming Help to Mitigate Climate Change?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Martin Dědina & Petr Jevič & Pavel Čermák & Jan Moudrý & Chisenga Emmanuel Mukosha & Tomáš Lošák & Tadeáš Hrušovský & Elizaveta Watzlová, 2024. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Silage Maize in Relation to Regenerative Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Sadeeka L. Jayasinghe & Dean T. Thomas & Jonathan P. Anderson & Chao Chen & Ben C. T. Macdonald, 2023. "Global Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review of Definitions and Assessment Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-49, November.
    6. Phoebe Koundouri & Anthony Cox & Arunima Malik & Ben Groom & Brian O'Callaghan & Cameron Hepburn & Catherine Kilelu & Christine Lins & Dale Squires & E. Somanathan & Heba Handoussa & Ian Bateman & Ism, 2023. "The Recovery from the Covid-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity for a Sustainable and Resilient World," DEOS Working Papers 2311, Athens University of Economics and Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4324-:d:1398513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.