IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4279-d1397578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach to the Key Soil Physical Properties for Assessing Soil Compaction Due to Livestock Grazing in Mediterranean Mountain Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Blanco-Sepúlveda

    (Geographic Analysis Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Málaga, Campus of Teatinos, s/n., 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • María Luisa Gómez-Moreno

    (Geographic Analysis Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Málaga, Campus of Teatinos, s/n., 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Francisco Lima

    (Geographic Analysis Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Málaga, Campus of Teatinos, s/n., 29071 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

The selection of key soil physical properties (SPPs) for studying the impact of livestock treading is an unexplored research topic, especially in studies that analyze the influence of livestock management on the degradation process. The objective of this work was to demonstrate that the key SPPs for studying the impact of livestock treading depend on the objectives of the research and the environmental characteristics of the study site. This work used discriminant analysis to establish the most significant SPPs among the following: bulk density (BD), total porosity (P), field capacity (FC), infiltration capacity (IC), and aggregate stability (AS). Results showed that (1) IC and BD are the key properties for identifying the areas affected (bare patch) and unaffected (vegetated patch) by livestock treading, (2) none of the SPPs are significant under increasing stocking rates, and (3) BD is the key property for analyzing livestock impact with increasing stocking rate, using soil calcium carbonate content, slope exposure, and grass cover. We concluded that the relationship between physical soil degradation and stocking rate is not linear because it depends on environmental factors; therefore, to establish the key SPPs, it is necessary to take this fact into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Blanco-Sepúlveda & María Luisa Gómez-Moreno & Francisco Lima, 2024. "An Approach to the Key Soil Physical Properties for Assessing Soil Compaction Due to Livestock Grazing in Mediterranean Mountain Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4279-:d:1397578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liming Lai & Sandeep Kumar, 2020. "A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuemin Gong & Yijia Wang & Tianyu Zhan & Chenxu Wang & Changjia Li & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Advances in Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystems in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Lei Lei & Jiahua Zheng & Shaoyu Li & Lishan Yang & Wenqiong Wang & Feng Zhang & Bin Zhang, 2023. "Soil Hydrological Properties’ Response to Long-Term Grazing on a Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Zhiwen Ma & Wenping Qin & Zhaoqi Wang & Chenglong Han & Xiang Liu & Xiaotao Huang, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Soil Organic Carbon Response to Livestock Grazing in Grassland of the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Michael Aide & Indi Braden & Susan Murray & Collin Schabbing & Sophia Scott & Samantha Siemers & Sven Svenson & Julie Weathers, 2021. "Optimizing Beef Cow-Calf Grazing across Missouri with an Emphasis on Protecting Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Meki, Manyowa N. & Osorio-Leyton, Javier & Steglich, Evelyn M. & Kiniry, Jim R. & Propato, Marco & Winchell, Mike & Rathjens, Hendrik & Angerer, Jay P. & Norfleet, Lee M., 2023. "Plant parameterization and APEXgraze model calibration and validation for US land resource region H grazing lands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Yuanyuan Qu & Qinxuan Wu & Ojimamdov Habib Darmorakhtievich & Junfeng Wang & Xiuzi Ren & Xiaohong Chai & Xuexuan Xu & Feng Du, 2024. "Effects of Long-Term Fenced Enclosure on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Infiltration Ability in Grasslands of Yunwu Mountain, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4279-:d:1397578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.