IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p351-d1310608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic Assessment of Decarbonization Pathways of Energy-Intensive Industries Based on Exergy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Leisin

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Peter Radgen

    (Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use (IER), University of Stuttgart, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

The decarbonization of the industrial sector plays a crucial role in a successful energy transition. This transformation is very costly and complex, as many of the existing production processes and plants will have to be partially or completely replaced to reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. This raises questions about how significant reductions in CO 2 emissions resulting from decarbonization will affect the use of resources to produce a certain product and the overall value of sustainability. This article considers the relationship between CO 2 reduction and the impact on the resource efficiency of an industrial production process. For this purpose, a methodology was developed that holistically assesses the decarbonization pathway of an industrial sector. This holistic assessment takes into account the energy carriers, raw materials, and auxiliary and construction materials used for the operation and building of the significant plant components and summarizes them as a total use of resources. For this purpose, the use of resources is represented by the thermodynamic quantity exergy, which takes into account both the energy and material components of a production process. The energy and material streams in a production process are balanced by applying exergetic analysis. This methodology is used for current state-of-the-art and future decarbonized production processes in order to quantify the effects of the decarbonization process. By comparing the calculated resource efficiencies, the thermodynamic impact on the sustainability of decarbonization paths can be set in relation to the amount of CO 2 saved. For validation, the developed methodology is applied to a conventional and a decarbonized ammonia production process. The conventional production route represents the production of ammonia by methane steam reforming, and the decarbonized production route is represented by synthesis gas production via water electrolysis and an air separation unit. The resource efficiency of the conventional ammonia production route, taking into account the energy sources, raw materials, construction materials, and auxiliary materials used, is 59%, producing a total of 1539 kg of CO 2 emissions per ton of ammonia. The decarbonized process has a resource efficiency of 45%, while no CO 2 emissions are produced in this manufacturing process. This means that the decarbonization of the production process reduces resource efficiency by 14%. In relation to the reduced amount of CO 2 , specific resource efficiency decreases by 9.09%/t CO2 . The decline in resource efficiency is mainly due to the high level of heat and energy recovery in the conventional process and the very electricity-intensive hydrogen production in the decarbonized production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Leisin & Peter Radgen, 2023. "Holistic Assessment of Decarbonization Pathways of Energy-Intensive Industries Based on Exergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:351-:d:1310608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fellaou, S. & Bounahmidi, T., 2018. "Analyzing thermodynamic improvement potential of a selected cement manufacturing process: Advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 190-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Laveet & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Rahim, N.A. & Islam, M.M., 2021. "Modeling, simulation and outdoor experimental performance analysis of a solar-assisted process heating system for industrial process heat," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 656-673.
    2. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Song, Dan & Lin, Ling & Wu, Ye, 2019. "Extended exergy accounting for a typical cement industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 678-686.
    4. Huseyin Gunhan Ozcan & Arif Hepbasli & Aysegul Abusoglu & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam, 2021. "Advanced Exergy Analysis of Waste-Based District Heating Options through Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Fellaou, S. & Harnoune, A. & Seghra, M.A. & Bounahmidi, T., 2018. "Statistical modeling and optimization of the combustion efficiency in cement kiln precalciner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 351-359.
    6. El Hallaoui, Zhor & El Hamdani, Fayrouz & Vaudreuil, Sébastien & Bounahmidi, Tijani & Abderafi, Souad, 2022. "Identifying the optimum operating conditions for the integration of a solar loop to power an industrial flash dryer: Combining an exergy analysis with genetic algorithm optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 828-841.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:351-:d:1310608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.