IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p196-d1307329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Impact of Basic Public Service Facility Configuration on Social–Spatial Differentiation: Taking the Zhaomushan District of Chongqing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ao Sun

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Yong Huang

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Li Yang

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Chen Huang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Hengling Xiang

    (General Research Institute of Architecture & Planning Design Co., Ltd., Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

Abstract

Objectively assessing the impact of various basic public service facilities on social–spatial differentiation has become a prerequisite for promoting urban social integration and development. However, in practice, the configuration of basic public service facilities is not always conducive to social integration, especially at the microscale. Effectively measuring the inhibitory or aggravating effects of various basic public service facility configurations on social–spatial differentiation has become a challenge. Based on the assumption that the configuration of basic public service facilities has inhibitory and aggravating effects on social–spatial differentiation, this study selected two types of objects: social space and basic public service facilities to refine the research elements. Using spatial and statistical analysis methods such as ecological factors, clustering, correlation, mediation, and superposition analysis, a framework was constructed to evaluate the impact of basic public service facility configuration on social–spatial differentiation and take the Zhaomushan area in Chongqing, China, as a typical case for verification. The study found that registered residence, income, employment location, and residential density are still the main factors of social–spatial differentiation in the study area. The main factors contributing to the differentiation of basic public service facilities are elderly care and housing security, public transportation and green space access, education and employment security, and small-scale medical and health facilities in the study area. In the eight principal factor pairs after the superposition of two differentiation spaces, six pairs showed weakened spatial differentiation, while two pairs showed intensified spatial differentiation. This indicates that the allocation of basic public service facilities will simultaneously inhibit and exacerbate social–spatial differentiation, but the inhibitory effect is significantly stronger than the exacerbating effect. Among them, public transportation and green parks are the main types of facilities that mainly exacerbate social–spatial differentiation. This dual effect is specifically reflected in the change in the spatial adaptation position of social space and basic public services, the weakening of the original social space differentiation boundary and the emergence of new differentiation boundaries simultaneously, and the multicenter composite form of social space. In the future, quantitative evaluation based on research frameworks can provide scientific basis for constructing spatial adaptability strategies for the supply of basic public service facilities and social production and life, such as adjusting the distribution, scale, and spatiotemporal relationship between basic public service facilities and residential communities in a reasonable manner. This is crucial for promoting social integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ao Sun & Yong Huang & Li Yang & Chen Huang & Hengling Xiang, 2023. "Assessment of the Impact of Basic Public Service Facility Configuration on Social–Spatial Differentiation: Taking the Zhaomushan District of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:196-:d:1307329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Castells, 2002. "Local and Global: Cities in the Network Society," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(5), pages 548-558, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang Zhang & Qiqi Sun, 2024. "Integrated Design Methods for Sustainable Public Seating in Urban Communities—A Shanghai Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shao, Shuai & Zhang, Xuebin & Yang, Lili, 2023. "Natural resource dependence and urban shrinkage: The role of human capital accumulation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Ben Derudder, 2021. "Network Analysis of ‘Urban Systems’: Potential, Challenges, and Pitfalls," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 404-420, September.
    3. Johan Post & Samson Mwangi, 2009. "Constraints on Neighbourhood Activism: Experiences with Services Upgrading in Nakuru, Kenya," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 665-686, March.
    4. Kaczmarek Tomasz & Kociuba Dagmara, 2017. "Models of governance in the urban functional areas: Policy lessons from the implementation of integrated territorial investments (ITIs) in Poland," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(4), pages 47-64, December.
    5. Manuel B. Aalbers & Ben Derudder, 2022. "Introduction to the Forum: Revisiting Manuel Castells on Cities in the Informational and Network Society," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(3), pages 227-229, July.
    6. Kujath, Hans Joachim, 2003. "Räumlicher Strukturwandel in deutschen Metropolregionen. Interaktion und Standortverhalten von Unternehmen der Wissensökonomie in Berlin und München," IRS Working Papers 19, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    7. Ben Derudder & Christof Parnreiter, 2014. "Introduction: The Interlocking Network Model for Studying Urban Networks: Outline, Potential, Critiques, and Ways Forward," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 373-386, September.
    8. Nathalie Van Nuffel & Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox, 2010. "Even Important Connections Are Not Always Meaningful: On The Use Of A Polarisation Measure In A Typology Of European Cities In Air Transport Networks," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(3), pages 333-348, July.
    9. Kujath, Hans Joachim, 2009. "Leistungsfähigkeit von Metropolregionen in der Wissensökonomie: Die institutionentheoretische Sicht," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Knieling, Jörg (ed.), Metropolregionen und Raumentwicklung, Teil 3: Metropolregionen. Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsfähigkeit, volume 127, pages 200-222, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Kujath, Hans Joachim, 2006. "Leistungsfähigkeit von Metropolregionen in der Wissensökonomie: Die institutionentheoretische Sicht," IRS Working Papers 34, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    11. Hesse, Markus, 2004. "Stadtregionen und die Politik der Drehscheibe. Zur Konstitution und Konstruktion von Räumen in der Welt der flows," IRS Working Papers 21, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    12. Wangbao Liu & Quan Hou & Zhihao Xie & Xin Mai, 2020. "Urban Network and Regions in China: An Analysis of Daily Migration with Complex Networks Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Lobodanova, Diana (Лободанова, Диана), 2015. "New Formats of Communication Platforms in Cities [Новые Форматы Коммуникационных Площадок В Городах]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 174-192.
    14. Madeleine Wagner & Anna Growe, 2021. "Research on Small and Medium-Sized Towns: Framing a New Field of Inquiry," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Peter J. Taylor & Ben Derudder, 2022. "Cities in Castells' Theorising of Social Space," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(3), pages 250-256, July.
    16. Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko, 2015. "Networks in Manuel Castells’ theory of the network society," MPRA Paper 65617, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Maano Ramutsindela, 2004. "Glocalisation and Nature Conservation Strategies in 21st‐Century Southern Africa," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(1), pages 61-72, February.
    18. Kroll, Henning, 2009. "Spillovers and proximity in perspective: a network approach to improving the operationalisation of proximity," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R2/2009, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    19. Peter J. Taylor & Ben Derudder, 2004. "Porous Europe: European Cities In Global Urban Arenas," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(5), pages 527-538, December.
    20. Dean B Carson & Andreas Koch, 2013. "Divining the local: Mobility, scale and fragmented development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(3), pages 304-319, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:196-:d:1307329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.