IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6780-d1125776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics

Author

Listed:
  • Kam Cheong Li

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Billy T. M. Wong

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Reggie Kwan

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Hon Tung Chan

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Manfred M. F. Wu

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Simon K. S. Cheung

    (Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the evaluation of hybrid learning and teaching practices by academics. A mixed research method involving a questionnaire survey and a focus group interview was employed to gather academics’ feedback on their experience in delivering hybrid instruction in a synchronous manner in which on-site and remote students attended classes simultaneously, their students’ hybrid learning effectiveness, and their suggestions for improvement. The questionnaire was administered to 76 academics from a university in Hong Kong where hybrid learning and teaching were implemented, and the focus group interview involved 10 academics. The findings reveal that the participating academics perceived themselves as having an overall high degree of readiness to handle technical issues. They expressed that the students from their hybrid classes had lower levels of interaction, engagement, and motivation than those from traditional face-to-face classes. The participants also reported their challenges regarding hybrid learning and teaching, including heavy workload for lesson preparation and face-to-face and online classroom management, unfamiliarity with interactive teaching design suitable for hybrid classes, and difficulties in monitoring students’ learning process. They provided suggestions for the improvement of hybrid classes, ranging from the provision of technological support to professional development for enhancing students’ online interaction and engagement. These findings contribute to revealing academics’ experience in practising hybrid learning and teaching and identifying ways to address their challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Kam Cheong Li & Billy T. M. Wong & Reggie Kwan & Hon Tung Chan & Manfred M. F. Wu & Simon K. S. Cheung, 2023. "Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6780-:d:1125776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kam Cheong Li & Billy Tak-Ming Wong & Reggie Kwan & Manfred Wu, 2023. "Learning in a hybrid synchronous mode: experiences and views of university students," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(2), pages 197-207.
    2. Daniel T. L. Shek & Xiaoqin Zhu & Xiang Li & Diya Dou, 2022. "Satisfaction with HyFlex Teaching and Law-abiding Leadership Education in Hong Kong University Students Under COVID-19," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2833-2858, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Billy T. M. Wong & Kam Cheong Li & Hon Tung Chan & Simon K. S. Cheung, 2023. "HyFlex Learning Research and Practice: A Longitudinal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Sani Alhaji Garba & Lawan Abdulhamid, 2024. "Students’ Instructional Delivery Approach Preference for Sustainable Learning Amidst the Emergence of Hybrid Teaching Post-Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio D. Mahinay, Jr. & Sophia Mariefer G. Ramirez & Precious Ferly Mae V. Rojo & Donna Saira L. De Gama & Camille R. Viloan, 2023. "Level of Readiness of Education Students for Hy Flex Modality," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 1913-1930, October.
    2. Halima Albalushi & Mohamed Al Mushaiqri & Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla & Srijit Das, 2022. "Students’ Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Wenyu Chai & Xiang Li & Daniel T. L. Shek, 2022. "The Effectiveness of a Leadership Subject Using a Hybrid Teaching Mode during the Pandemic: Objective Outcome and Subjective Outcome Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Daniel T. L. Shek & Xiang Li & Lu Yu & Li Lin & Yikang Chen, 2022. "Evaluation of Electronic Service-Learning (e-Service-Learning) Projects in Mainland China under COVID-19," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 3175-3198, October.
    5. Daniel T. L. Shek & Xiaoqin Zhu & Diya Dou & Xiang Li, 2022. "National Security Law Education in Hong Kong: Qualitative Evaluation Based on the Perspective of the Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Xiang Li & Daniel T. L. Shek & Tingyin Wong & Lu Yu, 2022. "Subjective Outcome Evaluation of Instructional Videos in Leadership Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Billy T. M. Wong & Kam Cheong Li & Hon Tung Chan & Simon K. S. Cheung, 2023. "HyFlex Learning Research and Practice: A Longitudinal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6780-:d:1125776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.