IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5228-d1098283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Sustainability of Bricks in an Emerging Economy: Current Environmental Hotspots and Mitigation Potentials for the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Kamrul Islam

    (Research Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8569, Ibaraki, Japan
    Department of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

  • Masaharu Motoshita

    (Research Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8569, Ibaraki, Japan)

  • Shinsuke Murakami

    (Department of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
    Department of Technology Management for Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

Abstract

Clay-fired bricks are widely used in emerging economies mainly because of the unavailability of higher-grade construction and building materials; however, they are associated with significant social and environmental damage. The environmental burdens associated with the fuels and materials required for brick production are huge, as they have both direct and indirect effects along supply chains. This study aimed to assess the environmental footprints of brick production along supply chains, focusing on relevant environmental issues in brick production: carbon dioxide emissions, water consumption, and land use. We demonstrate that fuelwood consumption constitutes a major share of the carbon and water footprints, whereas built-up land for brick drying dominates the major effect of land use. Our expansion of the ecological footprint method enables a comparison of the effects of three different environmental issues with the same land area dimension, which reveals the relative severity of carbon dioxide emissions that account for up to 20% of the national CO 2 inventory. For the potential reduction in the environmental footprint of brick production, scenario analysis showed a substantial reduction by replacing clay-fired bricks with concrete bricks. The shift to alternative materials, together with mitigation measures for brick production, can effectively alleviate the environmental pressures of construction materials in future emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamrul Islam & Masaharu Motoshita & Shinsuke Murakami, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability of Bricks in an Emerging Economy: Current Environmental Hotspots and Mitigation Potentials for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5228-:d:1098283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masaharu Motoshita & Yuya Ono & Matthias Finkbeiner & Atsushi Inaba, 2016. "The Effect of Land Use on Availability of Japanese Freshwater Resources and Its Significance for Water Footprinting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Shinjiro Yano & Naota Hanasaki & Norihiro Itsubo & Taikan Oki, 2015. "Water Scarcity Footprints by Considering the Differences in Water Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keiji Nakamura & Norihiro Itsubo, 2021. "Lifecycle Assessment of Monosodium Glutamate Made from Non-Edible Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Ik Kim & Kyung-shin Kim, 2019. "Estimation of Water Footprint for Major Agricultural and Livestock Products in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Giovanni Pino & Pierluigi Toma & Cristian Rizzo & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Alessandro M. Peluso & Gianluigi Guido, 2017. "Determinants of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Water Saving Measures: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Hilal Ahmad Sheikh & M. Sultan Bhat & Akhtar Alam & Shafkat Ahsan & Bilquis Shah, 2024. "Evaluating the drivers of groundwater spring discharge in Sindh basin of Kashmir Himalaya," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25645-25667, October.
    5. Chen Cao & Xiaohan Lu & Xuyong Li, 2019. "Risk Assessment and Pressure Response Analysis of the Water Footprint of Agriculture and Livestock: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Delbourg, Esther & Dinar, Shlomi, 2020. "The globalization of virtual water flows: Explaining trade patterns of a scarce resource," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Zhenzhen Zhao & Aiwen Lin & Jiandi Feng & Qian Yang & Ling Zou, 2016. "Analysis of Water Resources in Horqin Sandy Land Using Multisource Data from 2003 to 2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Thapat Silalertruksa & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Rattanawan Mungkung & Pariyapat Nilsalab & Naruetep Lecksiwilai & Wanchat Sawaengsak, 2017. "Implications of Water Use and Water Scarcity Footprint for Sustainable Rice Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Liao, Xiawei & Zhao, Xu & Liu, Wenfeng & Li, Ruoshui & Wang, Xiaoxi & Wang, Wenpeng & Tillotson, Martin R., 2020. "Comparing water footprint and water scarcity footprint of energy demand in China’s six megacities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5228-:d:1098283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.