IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3198-d1063439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous Knowledge and Perception of Local People towards Biodiversity Conservation in Rajouri District of Jammu and Kashmir, India

Author

Listed:
  • Qamer Ridwan

    (Applied Ecology Lab, Department of Botany, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, Jammu and Kashmir, India)

  • Zishan Ahmad Wani

    (Conservation Ecology Lab, Department of Botany, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, Jammu and Kashmir, India)

  • Mohd Hanief

    (Applied Ecology Lab, Department of Botany, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, Jammu and Kashmir, India)

  • Shreekar Pant

    (Centre for Biodiversity Studies, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, Jammu and Kashmir, India)

  • Ali Asghar Shah

    (School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, Jammu and Kashmir, India)

  • Sazada Siddiqui

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saad Alamri

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Plant resources have been used by humans for their wellbeing for ages. Tribal communities live in far flung areas in close proximity with forests and have a rich cultural heritage and traditional knowledge of forest resources. The present study was carried out in the Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir to document the traditional knowledge of plant usage and local perception towards biodiversity conservation. A total of 86 informants were selected through non-probability sampling using a convenience sampling method based on easy access, availability and relevance of informants. During the present study, a total of 92 plant species belonging to 85 genera and 57 families were recorded. Fabaceae and Rosaceae were found to be dominant families. In terms of growth forms, herbaceous species were dominant, followed by trees. Leaves were the most common parts used, followed by fruits. These plant species are used for different purposes such as medicine, edibles, fodder and dye making. A number of plant species were found to be multipurpose in use. Most of the documented plant species are collected by local people from the wild. Local people perceived that the populations of many species, such as Dolomiaea costus, Dioscorea deltoidea and Dolomiaea macrocephala , have declined in recent decades. Climate change, urbanization, deforestation, pollution, overexploitation and species invasion are some of the major threats to biodiversity perceived by the local people. Therefore, the establishment of protected areas and cultivation of wild species are recommended to safeguard forest wealth of the area. Furthermore, mass awareness and cooperation-building programs are highly recommended so that locals can enthusiastically participate in conservation and management programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Qamer Ridwan & Zishan Ahmad Wani & Mohd Hanief & Shreekar Pant & Ali Asghar Shah & Sazada Siddiqui & Saad Alamri, 2023. "Indigenous Knowledge and Perception of Local People towards Biodiversity Conservation in Rajouri District of Jammu and Kashmir, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3198-:d:1063439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prabuddh Kumar Mishra & Aman Rai & Kamal Abdelrahman & Suresh Chand Rai & Anuj Tiwari, 2021. "Analysing Challenges and Strategies in Land Productivity in Sikkim Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Schroeder, Heike & González P., Nidia C., 2019. "Bridging knowledge divides: The case of indigenous ontologies of territoriality and REDD+," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 198-206.
    3. Jinlong, Liu & Renhua, Zhang & Qiaoyun, Zhang, 2012. "Traditional forest knowledge of the Yi people confronting policy reform and social changes in Yunnan province of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 9-17.
    4. Uddin, Mohammad Nizam & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Chen, Yong & Siriwong, Wapakorn & Boonyanuphap, Jaruntorn, 2019. "Stakeholders' perception on indigenous community-based management of village common forests in Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 102-112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mavhura, Emmanuel & Mushure, Sharon, 2019. "Forest and wildlife resource-conservation efforts based on indigenous knowledge: The case of Nharira community in Chikomba district, Zimbabwe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 83-90.
    2. Ahammad, Ronju & Hossain, Mohammed Kamal & Sobhan, Istiak & Hasan, Rakibul & Biswas, Shekhar R. & Mukul, Sharif A., 2023. "Social-ecological and institutional factors affecting forest and landscape restoration in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Ullah, S M Asik & Tani, Masakazu & Tsuchiya, Jun & Rahman, M.Abiar & Moriyama, Masao, 2022. "Impact of protected areas and co-management on forest cover: A case study from Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Lucungu, Prince Baraka & Dhital, Narayan & Asselin, Hugo & Kibambe, Jean-Paul & Ngabinzeke, Jean Semeki & Khasa, Damase P., 2022. "Local citizen group dynamics in the implementation of community forest concessions in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Zambrano-Cortés, Darío Gerardo & Behagel, Jelle Hendrik, 2023. "The political rationalities of governing deforestation in Colombia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Xu, Hongzhang & Pittock, Jamie & Daniell, Katherine, 2022. "‘Sustainability of what, for whom? A critical analysis of Chinese development induced displacement and resettlement (DIDR) programs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. César J. Pérez & Carl A. Smith, 2019. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Conservation of Settled Territories in the Bolivian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-41, November.
    8. Nathan Einbinder & Helda Morales & Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho & Bruce G. Ferguson & Miriam Aldasoro & Ronald Nigh, 2022. "Agroecology from the ground up: a critical analysis of sustainable soil management in the highlands of Guatemala," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 979-996, September.
    9. de Wit, Fronika & Mourato, João, 2022. "Governing the diverse forest: Polycentric climate governance in the Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. -, 2021. "The impact of COVID-19 on indigenous peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala): Between invisibility and collective resistance," Documentos de Proyectos 46698, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Joa, Bettina & Winkel, Georg & Primmer, Eeva, 2018. "The unknown known – A review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 520-530.
    12. González, Nidia Catherine & Kröger, Markus, 2020. "The potential of Amazon indigenous agroforestry practices and ontologies for rethinking global forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Hongzhang Xu & Meng Peng & Jamie Pittock & Jiayu Xu, 2021. "Managing Rather Than Avoiding “Difficulties” in Building Landscape Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Mohammad Nizam Uddin & Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain & Mohammad Syful Karim & Mohammed Mizanur Rahman & Wapakorn Siriwong & Md. Lutfor Rahman & Jaruntorn Boonyanuphap, 2021. "Linking biodiversity with the forest patch size of village common forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17220-17239, December.
    15. Nikola Tričković & Vukašin Rončević & Nikola Živanović & Tara Grujić & Luka Stefanović & Nikola Jovanović & Miodrag Zlatić, 2023. "Ecological and Economic Effects of Applying the Future Agricultural Production Structure Model (FAPSMS): The Case Study of the Barička River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Pingarroni, Aline & Castro, Antonio J. & Gambi, Marcos & Bongers, Frans & Kolb, Melanie & García-Frapolli, Eduardo & Balvanera, Patricia, 2022. "Uncovering spatial patterns of ecosystem services and biodiversity through local communities' preferences and perceptions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Bhawna Negi & Kavita Khatri & Surendra Singh Bargali & Kiran Bargali, 2023. "Invasive Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in Agroecosystems of Kumaun Himalaya, India: A Threat to Plant Diversity and Sustainable Crop Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3198-:d:1063439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.