IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3030-d1060867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering the Implementation of Nature Conservation Measures in Agricultural Landscapes: The NatApp

Author

Listed:
  • Frauke Geppert

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
    Faculty of Life Science, Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Science, Humboldt University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
    Faculty of Life Science, Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Science, Humboldt University of Berlin, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 5, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Ioanna Mouratiadou

    (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
    ISARA, Laboratory of Rural Studies Research Unit, 23 rue Jean Baldassini, CEDEX 07, 69364 Lyon, France)

Abstract

Large-scale, high-input, and intensified agriculture poses threats to sustainable agroecosystems and their inherent biodiversity. The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) covers a great number of nature conservation programs (Agri-Environment and Climate Measures, AECM) aiming to encourage sustainable agriculture. Currently, farmers are not encouraged to broadly implement these measures due to the lack of structured information, overly complicated and unclear application procedures, and a high risk of sanctions. In addition, the current structures are associated with time-consuming monitoring and control procedures for the paying agencies. Digital technologies can offer valuable assistance to circumvent relevant barriers and limitations and support a broader uptake of AECM. NatApp is a digital tool that supports and guides farmers through the complete process of choosing, applying, implementing, and documenting AECM on their fields in accordance with legal requirements in Germany. We introduce the concept of NatApp and analyze how it can simplify and encourage the uptake and implementation of AECM. This study identifies its unique features for the provision of information and documentation opportunities compared with other digital farming tools focused on sustainable agriculture and outline how it can support farmers to actively contribute to more sustainable agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Frauke Geppert & Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura & Ioanna Mouratiadou, 2023. "Fostering the Implementation of Nature Conservation Measures in Agricultural Landscapes: The NatApp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3030-:d:1060867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Was, Adam & Zawalinska, Katarzyna & Britz, Wolfgang, 2014. "Impact of ‘greening’ the Common Agricultural Policy: Evidence from selected countries based on CAPRI model," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186374, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Juan Carlos Laso Bayas & Andrea Gardeazabal & Mathias Karner & Christian Folberth & Luis Vargas & Rastislav Skalský & Juraj Balkovič & Anto Subash & Moemen Saad & Sylvain Delerce & Jesús Crespo Cuares, 2020. "AgroTutor: A Mobile Phone Application Supporting Sustainable Agricultural Intensification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Buschmann, Christoph & Röder, Norbert, 2019. "Farmers' Preferences for Agri-Environmental Schemes: Findings from a Discrete Choice Experiment for the Design of a Farmland Bird Conservation Measure," 59th Annual Conference, Braunschweig, Germany, September 25-27, 2019 292288, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Lundström, Christina & Lindblom, Jessica, 2018. "Considering farmers' situated knowledge of using agricultural decision support systems (AgriDSS) to Foster farming practices: The case of CropSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 9-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José A. Martínez-Casasnovas & Alexandre Escolà & Jaume Arnó, 2018. "Use of Farmer Knowledge in the Delineation of Potential Management Zones in Precision Agriculture: A Case Study in Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. McGrath, Karen & Brown, Claire & Regan, Áine & Russell, Tomás, 2023. "Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Hristov, Jordan & Clough, Yann & Sahlin, Ullrika & Smith, Henrik G. & Stjernman, Martin & Olsson, Ola & Sahrbacher, Amanda & Brady, Mark V., 2020. "Impacts of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy “Greening” reform on agricultural development, biodiversity, and ecosystem services," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 716-738.
    4. Karly Ann Burch & Dawn Nafus & Katharine Legun & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Intellectual property meets transdisciplinary co-design: prioritizing responsiveness in the production of new AgTech through located response-ability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 455-474, June.
    5. Sophia Xiaoxia Duan & Santoso Wibowo & Josephine Chong, 2021. "A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Agriculture Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Agribusiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Pedersen, Michael Friis & Gyldengren, Jacob Glerup & Pedersen, Søren Marcus & Diamantopoulos, Efstathios & Gislum, René & Styczen, Merete Elisabeth, 2021. "A simulation of variable rate nitrogen application in winter wheat with soil and sensor information - An economic feasibility study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Mamiya Binte Ahsan & Guo Leifeng & Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam & Beibei Xu & Shah Johir Rayhan & Abdul Kaium & Wang Wensheng, 2022. "Barriers, Challenges, and Requirements for ICT Usage among Sub-Assistant Agricultural Officers in Bangladesh: Toward Sustainability in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Ke Zhang & Xue Wang & Xiaoling Wang & Syed Tahir Ata-Ul-Karim & Yongchao Tian & Yan Zhu & Weixing Cao & Xiaojun Liu, 2020. "Does the Organ-Based N Dilution Curve Improve the Predictions of N Status in Winter Wheat?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Vega-Bayo, Ainhoa & Mariel, Petr & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Corsi, Armando Maria & Chovan, Milan, 2023. "Climate change adaptation preferences of winemakers from the Rioja wine appellation," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Carlos F. Brunner-Parra & Luis A. Croquevielle-Rendic & Carlos A. Monardes-Concha & Bryan A. Urra-Calfuñir & Elbio L. Avanzini & Tomás Correa-Vial, 2022. "Web-Based Integer Programming Decision Support System for Walnut Processing Planning: The MeliFen Case," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Evangelos Alexandropoulos & Vasileios Anestis & Federico Dragoni & Anja Hansen & Saoirse Cummins & Donal O’Brien & Barbara Amon & Thomas Bartzanas, 2023. "Decision Support Systems Based on Gaseous Emissions and Their Impact on the Sustainability Assessment at the Livestock Farm Level: An Evaluation from the User’s Side," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    12. David Christian Rose & Anna Barkemeyer & Auvikki Boon & Catherine Price & Dannielle Roche, 2023. "The old, the new, or the old made new? Everyday counter-narratives of the so-called fourth agricultural revolution," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 423-439, June.
    13. Nyi-Nyi Htun & Diego Rojo & Jeroen Ooge & Robin De Croon & Aikaterini Kasimati & Katrien Verbert, 2022. "Developing Visual-Assisted Decision Support Systems across Diverse Agricultural Use Cases," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Jiahong Yuan & Xiaoyu Li & Zilai Sun & Junhu Ruan, 2021. "Will the Adoption of Early Fertigation Techniques Hinder Famers’ Technology Renewal? Evidence from Fresh Growers in Shaanxi, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Huber, Robert & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3030-:d:1060867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.