IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2597-d1053775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lean Farm: Application of Tools and Concepts of Lean Manufacturing in Agro-Pastoral Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Adriano de Oliveira Martins

    (Department of Production and Systems Engineering, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Fernando Elemar Vicente dos Anjos

    (Department of Production and Systems Engineering, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil
    Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS), Campus Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95043-700, Brazil)

  • Debora Oliveira da Silva

    (Department of Production and Systems Engineering, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

Abstract

Agriculture must find new ways to reduce costs and increase efficiency to meet the rising demand for products, avoiding waste due to potential food scarcity. Through the systematic literature review methodology, this study analyzes and synthesizes the existing literature on lean manufacturing (LM) applied in agro-pastoral production, its impact on reduction in losses and waste, and productivity increases considering production function mechanism (PFM), connecting to a sustainability model based on triple bottom line (TBL). A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify relevant studies and critically evaluate them using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings provide insights into LM applied in agro-pastoral production and inform future research in the field, highlighting the potential of using LM concepts by reducing losses and waste and increasing productivity. The potential for TBL impacts from application of lean concepts in agro-pastoral production suggests a tendency for growth in this area of research. A theoretical understanding of how lean tools and techniques can be applied to improve productivity and profitability in the agricultural sector is provided, as well as practical examples and recommendations for implementing lean practices in agricultural operations, aligning sustainability and LP tools and concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriano de Oliveira Martins & Fernando Elemar Vicente dos Anjos & Debora Oliveira da Silva, 2023. "The Lean Farm: Application of Tools and Concepts of Lean Manufacturing in Agro-Pastoral Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2597-:d:1053775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antônio Zanin & Cristian Baú Dal Magro & Diones Kleinibing Bugalho & Francieli Morlin & Paulo Afonso & Andrzej Sztando, 2020. "Driving Sustainability in Dairy Farming from a TBL Perspective: Insights from a Case Study in the West Region of Santa Catarina, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Abdullah Emre Keleş & Hatice Kübra Yılmaz, 2022. "Investigation of Lean Production Knowledge among Employees in Building Inspection Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Matteo Trabucco & Pietro De Giovanni, 2021. "Achieving Resilience and Business Sustainability during COVID-19: The Role of Lean Supply Chain Practices and Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2011. "Operational model for planning the harvest and distribution of perishable agricultural products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 677-687, October.
    5. Lokman I. Meho & Yvonne Rogers, 2008. "Citation counting, citation ranking, and h‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(11), pages 1711-1726, September.
    6. Konrad Żukiewicz & Agnieszka Dudziak & Tomasz Słowik & Jacek Mazur & Patrycja Łusiak, 2022. "Analysis of the Problem of Waste in Relation to Food Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Jena, Sanjay Dominik & Poggi, Marcus, 2013. "Harvest planning in the Brazilian sugar cane industry via mixed integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 374-384.
    8. Falah Abu & Hamed Gholami & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Norhayati Zakuan & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2021. "An SEM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Lean Implementation in Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pimchanok Panthai & Kanokporn Kungwalsong, 2024. "Resource Efficiency and Environmental Impact Assessment Method for Small-Scale Producers: A Case Study of Pond and In-Pond Raceway System Production for Growing Nile Tilapia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Shunyu Yao & Neng Fan & Clark Seavert & Trent Teegerstrom, 2023. "Demand-Driven Harvest Planning and Machinery Scheduling for Guayule," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & Donk, Dirk Pieter van & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Crop-related harvesting and processing planning: a review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Yiping Jiang & Liangqi Chen & Yan Fang, 2018. "Integrated Harvest and Distribution Scheduling with Time Windows of Perishable Agri-Products in One-Belt and One-Road Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    6. Chen, Jing & Dong, Ming & Xu, Lei, 2018. "A perishable product shipment consolidation model considering freshness-keeping effort," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 56-86.
    7. Thalis P. V. Zis & Harilaos N. Psaraftis, 2022. "Impacts of short-term measures to decarbonize maritime transport on perishable cargoes," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 602-629, September.
    8. Ramos, Francisco López & Batres, Rafael & De-la-Cruz-Márquez, Cynthia Griselle & Anzures, Melina López, 2023. "Optimization models for nopal crop planning with land usage expansion and government subsidy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Emilia Osmólska & Monika Stoma & Agnieszka Sagan & Barbara Chudzik & Agnieszka Starek-Wójcicka, 2022. "Effect of Supplementation of Freshly Pressed Carrot Juice with Rhus coriaria L. on Changes in Juice Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Junqueira, Rogerio de Ávila Ribeiro & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2019. "Modeling and solving a sugarcane harvest front scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 150-160.
    11. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting during the Crisis—What Was Disclosed by Companies in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-54, August.
    12. Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Alessandro Creazza & Marco Melacini & Fabrizio Dallari, 2022. "Heading for Tomorrow: Resilience Strategies for Post-COVID-19 Grocery Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. García-Pérez, Miguel A., 2011. "Strange attractors in the Web of Science database," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 214-218.
    14. Lejarza, Fernando & Pistikopoulos, Ioannis & Baldea, Michael, 2021. "A scalable real-time solution strategy for supply chain management of fresh produce: A Mexico-to-United States cross border study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Jakub Rybacki & Dobromił Serwa, 2021. "What Makes a Successful Scientist in a Central Bank? Evidence From the RePEc Database," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 13(3), pages 331-357, September.
    16. Víctor M. Albornoz & Lia C. Araneda & Rodrigo Ortega, 2022. "Planning and scheduling of selective harvest with management zones delineation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 873-890, September.
    17. Mojtaba Ashour & Amir Mahdiyar & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Salih Selek & Ayman Saleh, 2014. "Use of h index and g index for American academic psychiatry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 541-548, May.
    19. Omar Mubin & Abdullah Al Mahmud & Muneeb Ahmad, 2017. "HCI down under: reflecting on a decade of the OzCHI conference," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 367-382, July.
    20. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2597-:d:1053775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.