IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2570-d1052971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms of How Private Equity Drives Industrial Upgrade: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Zhu

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Fan Dong

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Liangwen Hu

    (School of Art & Science, The State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, NY 11720, USA)

Abstract

In recent years, the investment of private equity funds in China has increased and has become an important tool to promote industrial structure upgrades. Therefore, it is of theoretical and practical significance to study how and why industrial upgrades are driven by private equity funds. First, we use the understanding of heterogeneity to study the differences between the use of private equity funds and other financial instruments to stimulate industrial upgrades, and we represent industrial growth from two perspectives: economic aggregate growth and economic efficiency improvement. Next, we use shift-share analysis to disaggregate industrial upgrades into static and dynamic transfer effects, showing that other financial instruments only promote production factor mobility but not production efficiency, while private equity funds significantly contribute to both mobility and efficiency. Finally, the mediating effect model is used to study how private equity funds drive industrial upgrades: mainly from efficiency improvement based on technological progress and innovation output, and to a lesser extent from the promotion of factor mobility. The findings have practical value and implications for the optimization of financial reforms and the sustainability of regional economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Zhu & Fan Dong & Liangwen Hu, 2023. "Mechanisms of How Private Equity Drives Industrial Upgrade: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2570-:d:1052971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josh Lerner & Morten Sorensen & Per Strömberg, 2011. "Private Equity and Long‐Run Investment: The Case of Innovation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(2), pages 445-477, April.
    2. Cristina Aybar-Arias & Alejandro Casino-Martínez & José López-Gracia, 2012. "On the adjustment speed of SMEs to their optimal capital structure," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 977-996, November.
    3. Pasinetti,Luigi L., 1983. "Structural Change and Economic Growth," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521274104, November.
    4. Hongwei Liao & Liangping Yang & Henan Ma & JiaoJiao Zheng, 2020. "Technology import, secondary innovation, and industrial structure optimization: A potential innovation strategy for China," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 145-160, May.
    5. Chengsi Zhang & Yueteng Zhu, 2020. "The interest group theory of financial development in China: Openness and the role of interest groups," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 982-999, April.
    6. Ma, Huanyu & Hao, Dapeng, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty, financial development, and financial constraints: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 368-386.
    7. Brown, James R. & Martinsson, Gustav & Petersen, Bruce C., 2012. "Do financing constraints matter for R&D?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1512-1529.
    8. Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, 2011. "Financial Market and Technological Innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 351-368.
    9. Jiao-Jiao Fan & Ruzhi Xu & Chi Wei Su & Qing-Hua Shi, 2018. "Demand-following or supply-leading? Trade openness and financial development in China," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 314-332, April.
    10. Qiuyang Zhou & Zhenqiang Li, 2021. "The impact of industrial structure upgrades on the urban–rural income gap: An empirical study based on China's provincial panel data," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1761-1782, September.
    11. Juan Carvajalino, 2021. "Unlocking the Mystery of the Origins of John von Neumann’s Growth Model," Post-Print halshs-03849493, HAL.
    12. Wang, Di & Ren, Cairu & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "Understanding the impact of land finance on industrial structure change in China: Insights from a spatial econometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Wen Xiao & Jia-Dong Pan & Li-Yun Liu, 2018. "China’S Industrial Structure Upgrade In The “New Normal”: Empirical Test And Determinants," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(04), pages 1037-1058, September.
    14. Dongyang Zhang & Xinxin Ma & Jun Zhang & Quheng Deng, 2020. "Can Consumption Drive Industrial Upgrades? Evidence from Chinese Household and Firm Matching Data," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 409-426, January.
    15. repec:bla:revinw:v:24:y:1978:i:1:p:105-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. John H. Moore, 1978. "A Measure Of Structural Change In Output," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 24(1), pages 105-118, March.
    17. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    18. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Tian, Xuan & Xu, Yan, 2014. "Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 116-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen Cheng & Si Cheng & Chunsheng Feng, 2024. "The Triple Helix Model for Industry-Education City Integration in China: A Development Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shusen Qi & Steven Ongena, 2020. "Fuel the Engine: Bank Credit and Firm Innovation," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 57(2), pages 115-147, April.
    2. Ramana Nanda & William R. Kerr, 2015. "Financing Innovation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 445-462, December.
    3. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2015_028 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Brown, James R. & Floros, Ioannis V., 2012. "Access to private equity and real firm activity: Evidence from PIPEs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 151-165.
    5. Thorsten Beck & Robin Döttling & Thomas Lambert & Mathijs Dijk, 2023. "Liquidity creation, investment, and growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 297-336, June.
    6. Amess, Kevin & Stiebale, Joel & Wright, Mike, 2015. "The impact of private equity on firms' innovation activity," DICE Discussion Papers 184, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    7. Guney, Yilmaz & Karpuz, Ahmet & Ozkan, Neslihan, 2017. "R&D investments and credit lines," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 261-283.
    8. Jan Philip Schain & Joel Stiebale, 2021. "Innovation, institutional ownership and financial constraints," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1689-1697, September.
    9. Alexeeva-Alexeev, Inna & Mazas-Perez-Oleaga, Cristina, 2024. "Do ICT firms manage R&D differently? Firm-level and macroeconomic effects on corporate R&D investment: Empirical evidence from a multi-countries context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Marek Giebel & Kornelius Kraft, 2024. "R&D investments under financing constraints," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1141-1168, October.
    11. repec:zbw:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201512141480 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Bechlioulis, Alexandros & Economidou, Claire & Karamanis, Dimitrios & Konstantios, Dimitrios, 2023. "How important are capital controls in shaping innovation activity?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. (Grace) Qing Hao & Keming Li, 2016. "The Bright Side of Discretionary Accruals: Evidence from Finance and Innovation," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(4), pages 540-575, September.
    14. Ramana Nanda & William R. Kerr, 2015. "Financing Innovation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 445-462, December.
    15. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201512141480 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lyu, Xiaoliang & Ma, Jiameng & Zhang, Xiaochen, 2023. "Social trust and corporate innovation: An informal institution perspective," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Amess, Kevin & Stiebale, Joel & Wright, Mike, 2016. "The impact of private equity on firms׳ patenting activity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 147-160.
    18. Zheng, Mingbo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Wang, Quan-Jing & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "Financial globalization and technological innovation: International evidence," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    19. Chen, Shiu-Sheng, 2017. "Exchange rate undervaluation and R&D activity," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 148-160.
    20. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2023. "SMEs’ behavior under financial constraints: An empirical investigation on the legal environment and the substitution effect with tax arrears," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    21. Çağatay Bircan & Ralph De Haas, 2020. "The Limits of Lending? Banks and Technology Adoption across Russia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 536-609.
    22. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    23. Nguyen, Minh Hong & Trinh, Vu Quang, 2023. "U.K. economic policy uncertainty and innovation activities: A firm-level analysis," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2570-:d:1052971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.