IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2073-d1043611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographic Information System Based Suitable Temporary Shelter Location for Mount Merapi Eruption

Author

Listed:
  • Slamet Setio Wigati

    (Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
    Industrial Technology Faculty, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Bertha Maya Sopha

    (Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Anna Maria Sri Asih

    (Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Heri Sutanta

    (Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

Abstract

Merapi is an active volcano in the Sleman District with eruptions occurring periodically. However, the time and the power of the eruptions of Merapi could not be predicted accurately. Therefore, considering the dense population around the peak of Mount Merapi, appropriate and fast handling is needed when an eruption occurs. One of the crucial parts to be handled is the availability of evacuation places for the affected population. Even though Sleman district already has contingency and evacuation plans, the existing contingency and evacuation plans cannot necessarily be implemented, as in the case of the 2010 eruption. The locations planned as the shelters based on the contingency and evacuation plans of 2009 are no longer safe, including the permanent shelters owned by Sleman Regency. Thus, in the 2010 eruption, the refugees had to be evacuated to other safe places. Hence, some additional locations planned to be temporary refuges or shelters are needed to anticipate the change in eruption patterns in the future. This paper aims to provide a model to determine suitable temporary shelter locations that meet several criteria, which include constraints (exclusionary criteria) and factors (evaluation criteria). The criteria in this study were defined based on a literature review, interviews, and a questionnaire survey on experts who have experience in the field of disasters, especially in the eruption of Mount Merapi. Constraint criteria are used to determine the candidates for shelters, i.e., the locations that are possible to be used as shelters. Potential shelters will be selected from the candidates that meet the factor criteria using geographic information system (GIS), fuzzy logic, multi-criteria decision making (analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and weighted linear combination (WLC)). The implementation of the model in the 2010 eruption case shows that the refugees experienced moving to a safe place three times during the evacuation, within a safe radius of 10, 15, and 20 km due to the increase in the power of the eruption. In this paper, therefore, the potential temporary shelters will be designed at a safe radius of 10, 15, and 20 km. For further research, the potential shelters determined can be used as input in determining the optimal shelter locations by developing an optimization model.

Suggested Citation

  • Slamet Setio Wigati & Bertha Maya Sopha & Anna Maria Sri Asih & Heri Sutanta, 2023. "Geographic Information System Based Suitable Temporary Shelter Location for Mount Merapi Eruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2073-:d:1043611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kılcı, Fırat & Kara, Bahar Yetiş & Bozkaya, Burçin, 2015. "Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 323-332.
    2. Yijun Shi & Guofang Zhai & Lihua Xu & Quan Zhu & Jinyang Deng, 2019. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disasters: A Multi-Level Location–Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Wei Chen & Guofang Zhai & Chongqiang Ren & Yijun Shi & Jianxin Zhang, 2018. "Urban Resources Selection and Allocation for Emergency Shelters: In a Multi-Hazard Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Yunjia Ma & Wei Xu & Lianjie Qin & Xiujuan Zhao, 2019. "Site Selection Models in Natural Disaster Shelters: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Manuela Nappi & João Souza, 2015. "Disaster management: hierarchical structuring criteria for selection and location of temporary shelters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2421-2436, February.
    6. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Reza Bakhshi Lomer & Mahdi Rezaeian & Hamid Rezaei & Akbar Lorestani & Naeim Mijani & Mohammadreza Mahdad & Ahmad Raeisi & Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2023. "Optimizing Emergency Shelter Selection in Earthquakes Using a Risk-Driven Large Group Decision-Making Support System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    2. S. M. Amin Hosseini & Rama Ghalambordezfooly & Albert de la Fuente, 2022. "Sustainability Model to Select Optimal Site Location for Temporary Housing Units: Combining GIS and the MIVES–Knapsack Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Erkan Celik, 2024. "Analyzing the Shelter Site Selection Criteria for Disaster Preparedness Using Best–Worst Method under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Siqi Tang & Jianguo Wang & Yuanhao Xu & Shengbo Chen & Jiawang Zhang & Wutao Zhao & Guojian Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of Emergency Shelter Service Functions and Optimisation Suggestions—Case Study in the Songyuan City Central Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Jie Zhou & Wenyi Liu & Yu Lin & Benyong Wei & Yaohui Liu, 2024. "The Evaluation and Comparison of Resilience for Shelters in Old and New Urban Districts: A Case Study in Kunming City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Anchal Patil & Vipulesh Shardeo & Ashish Dwivedi & Noor Ulain Rizvi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2024. "A framework to evaluate the temporary hospital locations in wake of COVID-19 pandemic: implications to healthcare operations," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 438-452, June.
    7. Yoon Ha Lee & Ji Soo Lee & Seung Chan Baek & Won Hwa Hong, 2020. "Spatial Equity with Census Population Data vs. Floating Population Data: The Distribution of Earthquake Evacuation Shelters in Daegu, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. V. G. Venkatesh & Abraham Zhang & Eric Deakins & Sunil Luthra & S. Mangla, 2019. "A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1517-1550, December.
    9. Lei He & Ziang Xie, 2022. "Optimization of Urban Shelter Locations Using Bi-Level Multi-Objective Location-Allocation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Shaoqing Geng & Hanping Hou & Shaoguang Zhang, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Location Model of Emergency Shelters in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    12. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    14. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    15. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    16. Dilsu Binnaz Ozkapici & Mustafa Alp Ertem & Haluk Aygüneş, 2016. "Intermodal humanitarian logistics model based on maritime transportation in Istanbul," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 345-364, August.
    17. Patricia de Oliveira Melo & Renata Marques Britto & Tharcisio Cotta Fontainha & Adriana Leiras & Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira, 2017. "Evaluation of community leaders’ perception regarding Alerta Rio, the warning system for landslides caused by heavy rains in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1343-1368, December.
    18. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    19. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2073-:d:1043611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.