IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1793-d1038921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Ecosystem Services in an Andean Water Supply Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Marcela Ruíz Ordoñez

    (Grupo de Estudios Ambientales (GEA), Environmental Sciencies, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Calle 5 #4-70, Popayán 190003, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yineth Viviana Camacho De Angulo

    (Grupo de Estudios Ambientales (GEA), Environmental Sciencies, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Calle 5 #4-70, Popayán 190003, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Edgar Leonairo Pencué Fierro

    (Optics and Laser Group, Environmental Sciences, Department of Physics, University of Cauca, Calle 5 #4-70, Popayán 190003, Colombia)

  • Apolinar Figueroa Casas

    (Grupo de Estudios Ambientales (GEA), Environmental Sciencies, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Calle 5 #4-70, Popayán 190003, Colombia)

Abstract

Socio-ecological dynamics affect the ecosystem services supply and are relevant to generate effective water management strategies; this condition is considered to evaluate under a holistic approach, the water ecosystem services (WES) in an Andean supply basin (ASB) in Colombia. This analysis focus on the connection of biophysical and sociocultural components for the multi-purpose use of water based on The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) modelling for Las Piedras River Basin (LPRB). The generated Hydrological Response Units (HRUs), allows to estimate the capacity of the basin for supplying water (quantity) in adequate conditions (quality) for local populations in rural and urban areas, as well as WES zoning. The model was calibrated and validated to generate a baseline scenario, which was complemented with social cartography and participative workshops. The results indicate a low concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus, boosted by specific agro-ecological strategies developed by local communities; however, there are health risks for populations downstream and those that are supplied with water directly from the source. Additionally, Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) affects water availability, which demands restoration and conservation strategies to maintain WES supply for socioeconomic and cultural purposes, since different views on the available WES converge in the basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Marcela Ruíz Ordoñez & Yineth Viviana Camacho De Angulo & Edgar Leonairo Pencué Fierro & Apolinar Figueroa Casas, 2023. "Mapping Ecosystem Services in an Andean Water Supply Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1793-:d:1038921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Mera-Parra & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2021. "Establishment of the Baseline for the IWRM in the Ecuadorian Andean Basins: Land Use Change, Water Recharge, Meteorological Forecast and Hydrological Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yuddy Alejandra Castro Ortegón & Julio César Acosta-Prado & Pedro Mauricio Acosta Castellanos, 2022. "Impact of Land Cover Changes on the Availability of Water Resources in the Regional Natural Park Serranía de Las Quinchas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Berrouet, Lina & Villegas-Palacio, Clara & Botero, Verónica, 2020. "Vulnerability of Rural Communities to Change in an Ecosystem Service Provision: Surface water supply. A Case Study in the Northern Andes, Colombia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Bennett, Drew E. & Gosnell, Hannah, 2015. "Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social–ecological systems framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 172-181.
    5. Uribe, Natalia & Corzo, Gerald & Quintero, Marcela & van Griensven, Ann & Solomatine, Dimitri, 2018. "Impact of conservation tillage on nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses in a potato crop system in Fuquene watershed, Colombia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 62-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly Andrea Aguirre & Diego Paredes Cuervo, 2023. "Water Safety and Water Governance: A Scientometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Lin & Pang, Shujiang & Wang, Xiaoyan & Du, Yi & Huang, Jieyu & Melching, Charles S., 2021. "Optimal allocation of best management practices based on receiving water capacity constraints," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Rungruang Janta & Laksanara Khwanchum & Pakorn Ditthakit & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Water Yield Alteration in Thailand’s Pak Phanang Basin Due to Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Christian Mera-Parra & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2022. "Territorial Prospective to Sustainability: Strategies for Future Successful of Water Resource Management on Andean Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Xiaoyu Song & Yuqing Liu & Fanglei Zhong & Xiaohong Deng & Yuan Qi & Jinlong Zhang & Rong Zhang & Yongnian Zhang, 2020. "Payment Criteria and Mode for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Haiming Yan & Wei Li & Huicai Yang & Xiaonan Guo & Xingran Liu & Wenru Jia, 2021. "Estimation of the Rational Range of Ecological Compensation to Address Land Degradation in the Poverty Belt around Beijing and Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Min Zhou & Liu Yang & Dan Ye, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Rural Vulnerability and Its Clustering Model in Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Jiuhan Tang & Kangning Xiong & Yue Chen & Qi Wang & Bin Ying & Jiayi Zhou, 2022. "A Review of Village Ecosystem Vulnerability and Resilience: Implications for the Rocky Desertification Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Yan, Haiming & Yang, Huicai & Guo, Xiaonan & Zhao, Shuqin & Jiang, Qun'ou, 2022. "Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Petra Oppeltová & Pavel Kasal & František Krátký & Jana Hajšlová, 2021. "Analysis of Selected Water Quality Indicators from Runoff during Potato Cultivation after Natural Precipitation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Lien, Aaron M. & Schlager, Edella & Lona, Ashly, 2018. "Using institutional grammar to improve understanding of the form and function of payment for ecosystem services programs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 21-31.
    12. Mostegl, Nina M. & Pröbstl-Haider, Ulrike & Jandl, Robert & Haider, Wolfgang, 2019. "Targeting climate change adaptation strategies to small-scale private forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 83-99.
    13. Bourceret, Amélie & Amblard, Laurence & Mathias, Jean-Denis, 2023. "How do farmers’ environmental preferences influence the efficiency of information instruments for water quality management? Evidence from a social-ecological agent-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    14. Naveedh Ahmed S. & Le Hung Anh & Petra Schneider, 2020. "A DPSIR Assessment on Ecosystem Services Challenges in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Coping with the Impacts of Sand Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    15. Li, Sinan & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian & Tan, Kun, 2021. "Optimize and control territorial spatial functional areas to improve the ecological stability and total environment in karst areas of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    16. Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Arianna Oñate-Paladines & Milton Collaguazo, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Soil Impermeability and Its Impact on the Hydrology of An Urban Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Bourceret, Amélie & Amblard, Laurence & Mathias, Jean-Denis, 2022. "Adapting the governance of social–ecological systems to behavioural dynamics: An agent-based model for water quality management using the theory of planned behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Bingham, Logan Robert, 2021. "Vittel as a model case in PES discourse: Review and critical perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    19. Olosutean Horea, 2015. "Methods for Modeling Ecosystem Services: A Review," Management of Sustainable Development, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 5-12, June.
    20. Helena Guimarães, M. & Pinto-Correia, Teresa & de Belém Costa Freitas, Maria & Ferraz-de-Oliveira, Isabel & Sales-Baptista, Elvira & da Veiga, José Francisco Ferragolo & Tiago Marques, J. & Pinto-Cruz, 2023. "Farming for nature in the Montado: the application of ecosystem services in a results-based model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1793-:d:1038921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.