IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16947-d1302576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo De Marchi

    (Industrial Engineering and Automation (IEA), Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Fanny Friedrich

    (Industrial Engineering and Automation (IEA), Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
    Institut für Logistik und Materialflusstechnik (ILM), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Michael Riedl

    (Fraunhofer Italia Research Società Cooperativa a Responsabilità Limitata, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Hartmut Zadek

    (Institut für Logistik und Materialflusstechnik (ILM), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Erwin Rauch

    (Industrial Engineering and Automation (IEA), Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

Abstract

In today’s world, crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing global changes pose significant challenges for manufacturing companies. Resilience, the ability to withstand and recover from disruptions, is essential for survival. To make resilience actionable, the discussion introduces a four-step Circular Resilience Assessment Tool. To assess their resilience score, companies undergo a risk and vulnerability assessment, a qualitative resilience factor assessment, a suitable strategies identification phase, and a quantitative performance assessment. This tool guides companies in evaluating their resilience before, during, and after hypothetical or occurred crises. The balance among qualitative and quantitative aspects, encompassing technical, social, and organizational considerations, ensures that an omni comprehensive point of view is adopted in evaluating the overall resilience score of a company. This innovative approach empowers companies to not only survive crises but also to gain a competitive advantage and expand their market share in the long term. The work provides a thorough description of each of the four steps, accompanied by examples. The Circular Resilience Assessment Tool is designed to be as specific as necessary and as general as possible, thus making it a valuable resource for a variety of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo De Marchi & Fanny Friedrich & Michael Riedl & Hartmut Zadek & Erwin Rauch, 2023. "Development of a Resilience Assessment Model for Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16947-:d:1302576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boine Kim & Byoung-Goo Kim, 2023. "An Explorative Study of Resilience Influence on Business Performance of Korean Manufacturing Venture Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Vlajic, Jelena V. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Haijema, René, 2012. "A framework for designing robust food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 176-189.
    3. Tran, Huy T. & Balchanos, Michael & Domerçant, Jean Charles & Mavris, Dimitri N., 2017. "A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 73-84.
    4. Derissen, Sandra & Quaas, Martin F. & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2011. "The relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1121-1128, April.
    5. Frank Romeike & Peter Hager, 2020. "Erfolgsfaktor Risiko-Management 4.0," Springer Books, Springer, edition 4, number 978-3-658-29446-5, July.
    6. Xiaoxu Kong & Fei Jiang & Xuexin Liu, 2021. "Strategic Deviance, Diversification and Enterprise Resilience in the Context of COVID-19: Heterogeneous Effect of Managerial Power," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1547-1565, May.
    7. Sonia Irshad Mari & Young Hae Lee & Muhammad Saad Memon, 2016. "Sustainable and Resilient Garment Supply Chain Network Design with Fuzzy Multi-Objectives under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    2. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    3. Ignacio C. Fernández & David Manuel-Navarrete & Robinson Torres-Salinas, 2016. "Breaking Resilient Patterns of Inequality in Santiago de Chile: Challenges to Navigate towards a More Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Wang, Yuzhi & Zhang, Yingchao, 2022. "Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    6. Rota, Cosimo & Zanasi, Cesare & Reynolds, Nikolai, 2014. "Assessing the Supply Chain Governance Scenario in the Agri-food Sector: Development of a Measurement Tool," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199341, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    7. David Raba & Rafael D. Tordecilla & Pedro Copado & Angel A. Juan & Daniel Mount, 2022. "A Digital Twin for Decision Making on Livestock Feeding," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 267-282, May.
    8. Maddah, Negin & Heydari, Babak, 2024. "Building back better: Modeling decentralized recovery in sociotechnical systems using strategic network dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Finger, Robert & Buchmann, Nina, 2015. "An ecological economic assessment of risk-reducing effects of species diversity in managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-97.
    10. Luis Francisco López-Castro & Elyn L. Solano-Charris, 2021. "Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Criteria in the Supply Chain Network Design. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Peeters, Lotte & Bloemhof, Jacqueline M., 2013. "Sustainability Assessment Framework for Food Supply Chain Logistics: Empirical Findings from Dutch Food Industry," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Xin Zhang & Gang Zhao & Yingxiu Qi & Botang Li, 2019. "A Robust Fuzzy Optimization Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks Considering Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Sonia Irshad Mari & Young Hae Lee & Muhammad Saad Memon, 2014. "Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chain Network Design under Disruption Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-21, September.
    14. van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Peeters, Lotte & Bloemhof, Jacqueline M., 2013. "Empirical Findings from Dutch Food Industry," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164762, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    15. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Yasmina Ziad, 2021. "Improving Supply Chain Robustness & Resilience? Lessons from a case study in the automotive industry during the first wave of Covid-19," Post-Print hal-03306223, HAL.
    16. Watson, Bryan C & Morris, Zack B & Weissburg, Marc & Bras, Bert, 2023. "System of system design-for-resilience heuristics derived from forestry case study variants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    17. Zhou, Xinxin & Huang, Yun & Bai, Guanghan & Xu, Bei & Tao, Junyong, 2024. "The resilience evaluation of unmanned autonomous swarm with informed agents under partial failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    18. Ahmed Mohammed & Irina Harris & Anthony Soroka & Mohamed Naim & Tim Ramjaun & Morteza Yazdani, 2021. "Gresilient supplier assessment and order allocation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 335-362, January.
    19. Hanieh Shekarabi & Mohammad Mahdi Vali-Siar & Ashkan Mozdgir, 2024. "Food supply chain network design under uncertainty and pandemic disruption," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-37, June.
    20. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16947-:d:1302576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.