IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16766-d1298823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance and Techno-Economic Analysis of Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for the Mining Industry in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mpho Sam Nkambule

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Ali N. Hasan

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Thokozani Shongwe

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper presents an exploration of the potential of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs), combining floating solar photovoltaics (FPV), wind turbines, and vanadium redox flow (VRF) battery energy storage systems (BESSs) to expedite the transition from conventional to renewable energy for the mining sector in South Africa. The feasibility study assesses how to enhance the overall efficiency and minimize greenhouse gas emissions from an economic standpoint by using the Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) grid software version 1.11.1 and PVsyst version 7.4. Furthermore, the BESS Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) dispatch algorithm is proposed to make the most of the battery storage capacity and capability, aligning it with the dynamic energy demand and supply patterns of an HRES. The proposed HRES includes a highly efficient SFPV with a performance ratio of 0.855 and an annual energy production of 15,835 MWh; a wind turbine (WT) operating for 2977 h annually, achieving a 25% wind penetration rate; and a dynamic VRF-BESS with a 15,439 kWh life throughput and a 3 s dispatch response time. This HRES has a CapEx of R172 million, a 23.5% Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and an investment payback period of 4.9 years. It offers a low Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) at 4.27 R/kWh, a competitive Blended Cost of Energy (BCoE) at 1.91 R/kWh, and a positive net present cost (NPC), making it economically advantageous without external subsidies. Moreover, it annually reduces CO 2 emissions by 1,715,468 kg, SO 2 emissions by 7437 kg, and NOx emissions by 3637 kg, contributing to a significant environmental benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Mpho Sam Nkambule & Ali N. Hasan & Thokozani Shongwe, 2023. "Performance and Techno-Economic Analysis of Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for the Mining Industry in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-40, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16766-:d:1298823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16766/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16766/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon E. Uhunamure & Karabo Shale, 2021. "A SWOT Analysis Approach for a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Amalia Suryani & Alberto Bezama & Claudia Mair-Bauernfeind & Macben Makenzi & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "Drivers and Barriers to Substituting Firewood with Biomass Briquettes in the Kenyan Tea Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Maria Meirelles & Fernanda Carvalho & João Porteiro & Diamantino Henriques & Patrícia Navarro & Helena Vasconcelos, 2022. "Climate Change and Impact on Renewable Energies in the Azores Strategic Visions for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Reitumetse Ngcobo & Milan Christian De Wet, 2024. "The Impact of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Renewable Energy Supply in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. John Yang & Sang-Uk Jung, 2024. "Harnessing FinTech for Sustainable Finance in Developing Countries: An Integrated SWOT–Multi-Level Perspective Analysis of Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Agnieszka Piotrowska-Kirschling & Katarzyna Szelągowska-Rudzka & Jakub Karczewski & Joanna Brzeska, 2021. "Application of Shrimp Waste for the Synthesis of Polyurethane–Chitosan Materials with Potential Use in Sorption of Oil Micro-Spills in Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Agnė Žičkienė & Mangirdas Morkunas & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene, 2022. "Sustainable Energy Development and Climate Change Mitigation at the Local Level through the Lens of Renewable Energy: Evidence from Lithuanian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Melissa Seidel & Sabine Wichmann & Carl Pump & Volker Beckmann, 2024. "Combining Photovoltaics with the Rewetting of Peatlands—A SWOT Analysis of an Innovative Land Use for the Case of North-East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Hagreaves Kumba & Oludolapo Akanni Olanrewaju, 2024. "“Towards Sustainable Development: Analyzing the Viability and Integration of Renewable Energy Solutions in South Africa”—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Sheng Hu & Pan Zhang & Taoyuan Wei, 2022. "Financial Measures to Reduce Carbon Emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: A SWOT Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Yinhui Wang & Yugang He, 2023. "Does Information and Communication Technology Trade Openness Matter for China’s Energy Transformation and Environmental Quality?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Oluwafemi Oni & Andrew Swanson & Rudiren Pillay Carpanen & Anuoluwapo Aluko, 2022. "Implementation of a Multiterminal Line Commutated Converter HVDC Scheme with Auxiliary Controller on South Africa’s 765 kV Corridor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Thokozile Mazibuko & Katleho Moloi & Kayode Akindeji, 2024. "Techno-Economic Design and Optimization of Hybrid Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Wiktor Hebda, 2024. "Gas from the South, Not from Russia: The Possibility of Distributing Natural Gas from the Eastern Mediterranean to Poland and Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16766-:d:1298823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.