IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16714-d1297511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Sustainability Measurement for Innovation Performance for the Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Fontip Leesatapornwongsa

    (Technopreneurship and Innovation Management Program, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Natcha Thawesaengskulthai

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
    Human–Robot Collaboration and Systems Integration Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Ronnakorn Vaiyavuth

    (School of Integrated Innovation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

Abstract

While the significance of innovation management in sustaining competitiveness for businesses is widely recognized, there is an absence of research in the food industry regarding the measurement of sustainability outcomes resulting from innovation efforts. This research endeavors to construct a comprehensive measurement framework for assessing innovation performance. The primary objective is to examine the measures to evaluate the success the success of product innovation management concerning the sustainability objectives of organizations This study employs Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on an online survey of 354 Thai food manufacturers to investigate the robust evaluation of innovation performance in the food sector. The key findings reveal that the proposed measurement instrument for innovation management performance has been validated. All sustainability dimensions, including social, economic, and environmental sustainability, have been validated as the appropriate measurement for sustainability as a result of innovation management. The social aspect has the most influence, followed by the economic and environmental aspects. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insights for practitioners aiming to evaluate their innovation management practices by employing the developed measurement scale. By assessing and enhancing their innovation management approaches, organizations can strive for sustainability during dynamic environmental challenges and uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Fontip Leesatapornwongsa & Natcha Thawesaengskulthai & Ronnakorn Vaiyavuth, 2023. "Developing a Sustainability Measurement for Innovation Performance for the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16714-:d:1297511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adamantia G Pateli & George M Giaglis, 2004. "A research framework for analysing eBusiness models," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 302-314, December.
    2. Jose Albors-Garrigos & Juan Ignacio Igartua & Angel Peiro, 2018. "Innovation Management Techniques And Tools: Its Impact On Firm Innovation Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(06), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Saeed Nosratabadi & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Andry Rakotonirainy & Kwok Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Jiří Hřebíček & Ondřej Popelka & Michael Štencl & Oldřich Trenz, 2012. "Corporate performance indicators for agriculture and food processing sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 121-132.
    5. Aysegul Ates & George H. K. Wang, 2008. "Managed Futures," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Hung-Gay Fung & Xiaoqing Eleanor Xu & Jot Yau (ed.), Advances In International Investments Traditional and Alternative Approaches, chapter 9, pages 211-228, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. M. Flynn & L. Dooley & D. O'Sullivan & K. Cormican, 2003. "Idea Management For Organisational Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(04), pages 417-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    2. Iveta Šimberová & Alena Kocmanová, 2012. "Corporate governance - research of key indicators on market of processing industry in the Czech Republic via cluster analysis," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 359-368.
    3. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    5. Arfaoui, Nadia & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Boubaker, Sabri & Mirza, Nawazish & Karim, Sitara, 2023. "Interdependence of clean energy and green markets with cryptocurrencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    7. Gerard Farias & Christine Farias & Isabella Krysa & Joel Harmon, 2020. "Sustainability Mindsets for Strategic Management: Lifting the Yoke of the Neo-Classical Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Dotun Olaleye Faloye & Idowu Owoeye & Kunle Jayeola, 2021. "The Key Drivers of Business Model Innovation in Developing Countries’ Firms: Survey of Micro and Small Scale Enterprises in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(7), pages 148-157, July.
    11. Gorgijevski, Alexander & Holmström Lind, Christine & Lagerström, Katarina, 2019. "Does proactivity matter? the importance of initiative selling tactics for headquarters acceptance of subsidiary initiatives," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(4).
    12. Roberto Hernández-Chea & Akriti Jain & Nancy M. P. Bocken & Anjula Gurtoo, 2021. "The Business Model in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Jansky, Jaroslav & Polackova, Jana & Kozakova, Petra, 2012. "Methodological Approaches to Costs Evaluation of Canned Feed," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4), December.
    14. M-Chukri Idris & Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, 2021. "Innovation Management Systems and Standards: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-31, July.
    15. Yaffa Moskovich, 2023. "Communal Organizational Culture as a Source of Business-Success Sustainability in Kibbutz Industry—Two Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Maria Federica Cordova & Andrea Celone, 2019. "SDGs and Innovation in the Business Context Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Nora Wang & Chieh-Ning Hung, 2023. "Competitive Firms’ Optimal Decisions on Entering Accessory Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Rosaria Ferlito & Rosario Faraci, 2022. "Sustainable Hybrid Business Model of Benefit Corporation: The Case of an Italian Film Production Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Jadranka Musulin & Vjeran Strahonja, 2023. "User Experience, Business Models, and Service Design in Concert: Towards a General Methodological Framework for Value Proposition Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Alexandra Köves & Tamás Veress & Judit Gáspár & Réka Matolay, 2021. "Conceptualizing Cuvée Organizations: Characteristics Leading towards Sustainable Decision-Making Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16714-:d:1297511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.