IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16672-d1296518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Impact of Market Segmentation on Carbon Emission Intensity in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tianmiao Guo

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Jian Li

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Fengyue Gao

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Shuhua Zhang

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

Market segmentation behavior has led to environmental issues, notably, carbon emissions, during China’s economic transformation, posing a significant challenge to ongoing economic progress. This study builds upon the existing literature and empirical analyses on market segmentation and carbon emissions, establishing a theoretical framework to understand the relationship between market segmentation and carbon emission intensity. Using a panel dataset covering Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2020, we systematically examined the impact and transmission mechanisms of market segmentation on carbon emission intensity. This study revealed the following findings: (1) there is a significant positive correlation between market segmentation and carbon emission intensity, which remains true after a series of robustness tests; (2) the promoting effect of market segmentation on carbon emission intensity in the eastern region is significantly lower than that in the central and western regions and, as time goes by, the promoting effect of market segmentation on carbon emission intensity becomes smaller and smaller; (3) resource mismatch and industrial structure are two important transmission channels through which market segmentation affects carbon emission intensity; (4) market segmentation demonstrated a distinct positive spatial contagion impact on carbon emission intensity. This study provides valuable policy recommendations to align with China’s ‘dual carbon goals’ by supporting a unified market and fostering low-carbon development. These recommendations aim to steer China’s economy toward a greener and low-carbon transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianmiao Guo & Jian Li & Fengyue Gao & Shuhua Zhang, 2023. "Examining the Impact of Market Segmentation on Carbon Emission Intensity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16672-:d:1296518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Poncet, 2005. "A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 409-430, August.
    2. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    3. Finger, J M & Kreinin, M E, 1979. "A Measure of 'Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(356), pages 905-912, December.
    4. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    5. Jiekuan Zhang & Yan Zhang, 2021. "The relationship between China's income inequality and transport infrastructure, economic growth, and carbon emissions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 243-264, March.
    6. Song, Malin & Zhu, Shuai & Wang, Jianlin & Zhao, Jiajia, 2020. "Share green growth: Regional evaluation of green output performance in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 152-163.
    7. Cheng, Zhonghua & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Jun, 2018. "Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2935-2946.
    8. Junfeng Zhao & Jianliang Shen & Jinling Yan & Xiaodong Yang & Yu Hao & Qiying Ran, 2023. "Corruption, market segmentation and haze pollution: empirical evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 642-664, February.
    9. Yi, Ming & Liu, Yafen & Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Wen, Le, 2022. "Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: New evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. W. P. Pauw & Richard J. T. Klein & Kennedy Mbeva & Adis Dzebo & Davide Cassanmagnago & Anna Rudloff, 2018. "Beyond headline mitigation numbers: we need more transparent and comparable NDCs to achieve the Paris Agreement on climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 23-29, March.
    11. Yuanchao Bian & Kaiyi Song & Junhong Bai, 2021. "Impact of Chinese market segmentation on regional collaborative governance of environmental pollution: A new approach to complex system theory," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 283-309, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinfang Sun & Wenkai Li & Kaixiang Zhu & Mengqi Zhang & Haihao Yu & Xiaoyu Wang & Guodong Liu, 2024. "Research on Industrial CO 2 Emission Intensity and Its Driving Mechanism Under China’s Dual Carbon Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Li, Shuqi & Xu, Nuo, 2024. "Fair Competition Review System and cross-regional capital flow: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Feng & He, Ziwen, 2024. "Digital economy, land resource misallocation and urban carbon emissions in Chinese resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Kun Zheng & Hongbing Deng & Kangni Lyu & Shuang Yang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Market Integration, Industrial Structure, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Yanjun Yang & Rui Xue & Dong Yang, 2020. "Does market segmentation necessarily discourage energy efficiency?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Sijia Li & Lihua Wu, 2024. "The impact of regional integration on PM2.5 concentrations—Quasi‐natural experimental evidence from city economic coordination committee," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), September.
    6. Zhang, Weike & Fan, Hongxia & Zhao, Qiwei, 2023. "Seeing green: How does digital infrastructure affect carbon emission intensity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    7. Zhang, Zeyi & Luo, Xuehua & Hu, Huiying & Du, Jiating & Xu, Baoliang, 2023. "Market integration and urban air quality: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 910-928.
    8. Weidong Sun & Zhigang Chen & Danyang Wang, 2019. "Can Land Marketization Help Reduce Industrial Pollution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Ofori, Isaac K & Gbolonyo, Emmanuel Y. & Ojong, Nathanael, 2022. "Foreign Direct Investment and Inclusive Green Growth in Africa: Energy Efficiency Contingencies and Thresholds," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-58.
    10. Liang, Benbo & He, Gailei & Wang, Yuran, 2024. "The digital economy, market integration and environmental gains," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Lin Wang & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Digitization Meets Energy Transition: Shaping the Future of Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Ofori, Isaac K. & Gbolonyo, Emmanuel Y. & Ojong, Nathanael, 2022. "Foreign Direct Investment and Inclusive Green Growth in Africa: Energy Efficiency Contingencies and Thresholds," MPRA Paper 115379, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Nov 2022.
    13. Shi, Qiaoling & Zhao, Yuhuan & Qian, Zhiling & Zheng, Lu & Wang, Song, 2022. "Global value chains participation and carbon emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    14. Xiaoling Zhang & Zhangming Shan & Xuerong Wang & Decai Tang, 2023. "The Impact of Green Finance on Upgrading the Manufacturing Industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Spatial Econometric Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Ma, Xuejiao & Jiang, Ping & Jiang, Qichuan, 2020. "Research and application of association rule algorithm and an optimized grey model in carbon emissions forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Ofori, Isaac K. & Gbolonyo, Emmanuel Y. & Ojong, Nathanael, 2023. "Foreign direct investment and inclusive green growth in Africa: Energy efficiency contingencies and thresholds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Chen, Xu & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2021. "Polycentric agglomeration, market integration and green economic efficiency," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 185-197.
    18. Zhang, Qianxue & Liao, Hua & Hao, Yu, 2018. "Does one path fit all? An empirical study on the relationship between energy consumption and economic development for individual Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 527-543.
    19. Keyong Zhang & Yifeng Wen & Yunxia Wu, 2024. "How Digital Innovation Ecosystems Facilitate Low-Carbon Transformation of the Economy Based on a Dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Xi Lin & Yongle Zhao & Mahmood Ahmad & Zahoor Ahmed & Husam Rjoub & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2021. "Linking Innovative Human Capital, Economic Growth, and CO 2 Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16672-:d:1296518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.