IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16505-d1292935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perceptions on Sustainability Challenges and Innovations in General Aviation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Stiebe

    (Competence Center for Mobility, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU), Rösslimatte 48, 6002 Lucerne, Switzerland
    Graduate School of Business and Economics, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

While commercial aviation has received considerable social, political, and scholarly attention, general aviation (GA) has largely operated beneath the radar of sustainability discourse. GA grapples with a spectrum of sustainability challenges, encompassing the persistent use of leaded aviation gasoline, outdated technology, evolving demographics, escalating operational costs, noise pollution, adverse environmental perceptions, and public discontent. The sustainability transition in GA, akin to other transport sectors, is an intricate, sociotechnical process necessitating the integration of stakeholder and community perspectives. Existing literature primarily concentrates on technological aspects, offering a partial view of GA stakeholder viewpoints. This paper draws on quantitative methodology and conducts several statistical analyses, foremost ANOVA, t -tests, and regressions, of data from a 2022 online survey (N = 427) involving a diverse range of GA stakeholders. This study examines sustainability consciousness and perceptions within the GA community. The findings underscore shared sustainability concerns among GA stakeholders and illustrate how sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, income, and education exert varying degrees of influence on these perceptions. Additionally, a positive relationship emerges between non-aviation-related and aviation-related sustainability consciousness. Lastly, pilots with prior experience in electric aircraft display a more favorable view of electric aviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Stiebe, 2023. "Stakeholder Perceptions on Sustainability Challenges and Innovations in General Aviation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16505-:d:1292935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Mattioli, Giulio & Mathieu, Laurette, 2022. "Banning super short-haul flights: Environmental evidence or political turbulence?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Frédéric Dobruszkes & Giulio Mattioli & Laurette Mathieu, 2022. "Banning super short-haul flights: Environmental evidence or political turbulence?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/351156, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Ralf Barkemeyer & Diane Holt & Lutz Preuss & Stephen Tsang, 2014. "What Happened to the ‘Development’ in Sustainable Development? Business Guidelines Two Decades After Brundtland," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 15-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dlzar Al Kez & Christopher Lowans & Aoife Foley, 2024. "Sustainable Development in Third Level Programs: Distilling a Pathway to a True Net-Zero Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Bonilla, Xavier & Ivaldi, Marc, 2023. "Banning short-haul domestic flights: A preliminary assessment for France," TSE Working Papers 23-1482, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    3. Francisco Javier López-Acevedo & María Josefa Herrero & José Ignacio Escavy Fernández & José González Bravo, 2024. "Potential Reduction in Carbon Emissions in the Transport of Aggregates by Switching from Road-Only Transport to an Intermodal Rail/Road System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Emami Javanmard, Majid & Tang, Yili & Martínez-Hernández, J. Adrián, 2024. "Forecasting air transportation demand and its impacts on energy consumption and emission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    5. Sismanidou, Athina & Tarradellas, Joan & Suau-Sanchez, Pere & O'Connor, Kevin, 2024. "Breaking barriers: An assessment of the feasibility of long-haul electric flights," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Jielin Jing & Jianling Wang & Zhuochen Hu, 2023. "Has corporate involvement in government-initiated corporate social responsibility activities increased corporate value?—Evidence from China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Prince Amoah & Gabriel Eweje, 2021. "Impact mitigation or ecological restoration? Examining the environmental sustainability practices of multinational mining companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 551-565, January.
    8. Christos AMOIRADIS & Mariya STANKOVA, 2020. "The Systemic Crisis And The Need For Sustainability: An Overview," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 15-26, March.
    9. Meike Nicole Schulte & Cody Morris Paris, 2024. "Working the system—An empirical analysis of the relationship between systems thinking, paradoxical cognition, and sustainability practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4154-4171, September.
    10. Komninos Angelakoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate the Environmental Sustainability Performance of Mining Industrial Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Chang, Rui-Dong & Zuo, Jian & Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Zillante, George & Gan, Xiao-Long & Soebarto, Veronica, 2017. "Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: History, future directions and implications for renewable energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 48-56.
    12. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Olushola E. Ajide & Afolabi Otitoju, 2020. "Fostering Sustainable Development: A Corporate Social Responsibility Approach," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-62, March.
    13. Sutterlüty, Andrea & Šimunović, Nenad & Hesser, Franziska & Stern, Tobias & Schober, Andreas & Schuster, Kurt Christian, 2018. "Influence of the geographical scope on the research foci of sustainable forest management: Insights from a content analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 142-150.
    14. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    15. Despoina Caminis & Victoria Pekka-Economou, 2022. "Human Rights Issues in the Central Core Values of Corporate Sustainability Principles. Evidence from Voluntary Corporate Disclosure," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 72(3-4), pages 64-77, July-Dece.
    16. Edalati, Saeed & Ameri, Mehran & Iranmanesh, Masoud & Sadeghi, Zeinolabedin, 2017. "Solar photovoltaic power plants in five top oil-producing countries in Middle East: A case study in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1271-1280.
    17. Fatima Afzal & Benson Lim, 2022. "Organizational Factors Influencing the Sustainability Performance of Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Hyung Jong Na & Kun Chang Lee & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim, 2020. "Exploring CEO Messages in Sustainability Management Reports: Applying Sentiment Mining and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Andrea Gatto, 2020. "A pluralistic approach to economic and business sustainability: A critical meta‐synthesis of foundations, metrics, and evidence of human and local development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1525-1539, July.
    20. Borja Diez-Cañamero & Tania Bishara & Jose Ramon Otegi-Olaso & Rikardo Minguez & José María Fernández, 2020. "Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-36, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16505-:d:1292935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.